Mako Posted March 17, 2023 Report Share Posted March 17, 2023 (edited) robosmith believes: “The Democrat elites HATE the spreading of misinformation and LIES.“ I’ve met some pathetic dupes before, but robosmith wins the prize. https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/white-house/hunter-bidens-laptop-is-100-authentic-forensic-examination-concludes “A copy of Hunter Biden’s hard drive obtained by the Washington Examiner is indisputably authentic, and there is no evidence of any hacking or file manipulation, according to an examination conducted by a former Secret Service agent who has testified as a cyberforensics expert in over 100 classified, criminal, and civil matters at the state, federal, and international levels. The Washington Examiner commissioned Konstantinos "Gus" Dimitrelos to conduct a full forensic examination to determine the drive's authenticity and whether there were any signs of tampering. Using a technique he developed called "digital sandwiching," Dimitrelos cross-referenced thousands of emails, documents, business records, text messages, Apple Notes, photos, geolocation data, travel records, and other information on the drive to conclude that Biden is the only person capable of producing the data.” Edited March 17, 2023 by Mako Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
robosmith Posted March 17, 2023 Author Report Share Posted March 17, 2023 1 hour ago, Mako said: So you are saying you have no evidence the laptop was tampered with. I'm saying there is NO EVIDENCE it was NOT tampered with. Since there is unknown chain of custody, there is no proof that anything on it was put there by Hunter. That is the burden of evidence IN COURT. Prove it was NOT tampered with. 1 hour ago, Mako said: Did the laptop belong to Hunter Biden, yes or no? Doesn't matter since the evidence is unreliable. 1 hour ago, Mako said: Do you think MAYBE Biden relatives were enriched to influence Joe Biden? Do people usually dispense millions of dollars without expecting something in return? Also doesn't matter what they "expect," what matters is what was delivered. Some very wealthy people are willing to gamble chump change (to them). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mako Posted March 17, 2023 Report Share Posted March 17, 2023 5 hours ago, robosmith said: I'm saying there is NO EVIDENCE it was NOT tampered with. Since there is unknown chain of custody, there is no proof that anything on it was put there by Hunter. That is the burden of evidence IN COURT. Prove it was NOT tampered with. Doesn't matter since the evidence is unreliable. Also doesn't matter what they "expect," what matters is what was delivered. Some very wealthy people are willing to gamble chump change (to them). Why do you feel CBS is wrong? https://www.cbsnews.com/news/hunter-biden-laptop-data-analysis/ Data from a laptop that the lawyer for a Delaware computer repair shop owner says was left by Hunter Biden in 2019 – and which the shop owner later provided to the FBI under subpoena – shows no evidence of tampering or fabrication, according to an independent review commissioned by CBS News. Brian Della Rocca, the lawyer for the shop owner, provided to CBS News what he called an "exact copy" of the laptop data provided to federal investigators nearly three years ago. Della Rocca said he considers it "clean" because it predates versions that were widely circulated by Republican operatives to attack then-candidate Joe Biden before the 2020 presidential election. The independent analysis, by two cyber investigators from Minneapolis-based Computer Forensics Services, found no evidence that the user data had been modified, fabricated or tampered with. Nor did it find any new files originating after April 2019, when store records indicate Biden dropped it off for repair. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
robosmith Posted March 17, 2023 Author Report Share Posted March 17, 2023 8 hours ago, Mako said: Why do you feel CBS is wrong? https://www.cbsnews.com/news/hunter-biden-laptop-data-analysis/ Data from a laptop that the lawyer for a Delaware computer repair shop owner says was left by Hunter Biden in 2019 – and which the shop owner later provided to the FBI under subpoena – shows no evidence of tampering or fabrication, according to an independent review commissioned by CBS News. Brian Della Rocca, the lawyer for the shop owner, provided to CBS News what he called an "exact copy" of the laptop data provided to federal investigators nearly three years ago. Della Rocca said he considers it "clean" because it predates versions that were widely circulated by Republican operatives to attack then-candidate Joe Biden before the 2020 presidential election. The independent analysis, by two cyber investigators from Minneapolis-based Computer Forensics Services, found no evidence that the user data had been modified, fabricated or tampered with. Nor did it find any new files originating after April 2019, when store records indicate Biden dropped it off for repair. Experts such as Russia's IRA are able to modify hard disks without leaving a trace. Actually what happened according to the shop owner who should not be believed since he committed crimes wrt the laptop data revealed in Delaware. All of the data analysis outside of the FBI is CLEARLY SUSPECT because it was done on files extracted, not the hard disk itself. Quote What is there to know about Hunter Biden’s laptop? The story of Hunter Biden’s laptop is a long saga. The owner of a computer repair shop in Wilmington, Del. named John Paul Mac Isaac says that a man he believes to be Hunter Biden brought three laptops to his store in April 2019, according to an interview Mac Isaac gave to Fox News. Mac Isaac told Fox he has vision problems and “can’t be 100% sure” it was Hunter who dropped off the machines. On one of the laptops, Mac Isaac told Fox, he saw information that made him “concerned.” When the customer didn’t come back for the laptop, Isaac said an intermediary helped him reach out to the FBI. The FBI then made a copy of the laptop hard drive and later came back with a subpoena for the device itself and confiscated it, Mac Isaac told Fox. When Mac Isaac stopped hearing from the FBI, he told Fox, he eventually got in touch with Robert Costello, an attorney representing Rudy Giuliani, who has often served as Donald Trump’s personal lawyer. After that, computer files attributed to the laptop found their way to the New York Post, which published a story in October 2020 with the front page headline “Biden Secret E-mails.” Some copies of the laptop’s data that made it to various news organizations had changed hands repeatedly and been accessed by multiple computers, which made the entire trove hard to authenticate. But several news organizations have been able to confirm the authenticity of some of the information attributed to the laptop. Photos and videos attributed to the laptop and shared online also allegedly show Hunter Biden naked, using drugs and having sex. Republicans have taken to calling it “the laptop from hell.” In October 2022, Mac Isaac filed a defamation lawsuit against Hunter Biden and others in federal court in which he claimed the laptop and a hard drive became Mac Isaac’s property when Hunter Biden didn’t pick them up from the shop within 90 days. Recently, Hunter Biden has adopted a new, aggressive legal strategy in response to the coverage of the laptop and its contents. He recently hired defense lawyer Abbe Lowell, who has sent letters asking prosecutors to investigate those involved in copying and sharing the contents of the laptop. On Feb. 1, acting on Hunter Biden’s behalf, Lowell asked the attorney general of Delaware, Kathy Jennings, to investigate Mac Isaac for “unlawfully” accessing Hunter Biden’s personal data and distributing that data to “the political enemies” of Joe Biden. Lowell sent a similar request to Matthew Olsen, the assistant attorney general for national security at the Department of Justice. “These letters do not confirm Mac Isaac’s or others’ versions of a so-called laptop,” Lowell said in a statement to TIME. “They address their conduct of seeking, manipulating and disseminating what they allege to be Mr. Biden’s personal data, wherever they claim to have gotten it.” On March 17, Hunter Biden filed a countersuit against Mac Issac in U.S. District Court in Delaware. The 42-page suit accuses Mac Isaac of invading Hunter Biden’s privacy and being part of a conspiracy to obtain and distribute data. In the suit, Hunter Biden says the computer repair shop owner didn’t have a legal right to copy data from Biden’s laptop and pass it to others. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mako Posted March 18, 2023 Report Share Posted March 18, 2023 17 hours ago, robosmith said: Experts such as Russia's IRA are able to modify hard disks without leaving a trace. Actually what happened according to the shop owner who should not be believed since he committed crimes wrt the laptop data revealed in Delaware. All of the data analysis outside of the FBI is CLEARLY SUSPECT because it was done on files extracted, not the hard disk itself. I’m SURE you know more about the matter than the computer experts mentioned above. Face the facts robosmith, your life is a lie, Democrat elites are greedy cynical bastards: https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/companies/the-hideous-double-standards-of-the-silicon-valley-bank-bailout-bailouts-for-me-not-for-thee-opinion/ar-AA18IzEZ Don’t be their dupe. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.