reason10 Posted November 27, 2022 Report Share Posted November 27, 2022 https://www.foxnews.com/politics/clinton-aide-says-foundation-paid-for-chelseas-wedding-wikileaks-emails-show Clinton aide says Foundation paid for Chelsea’s wedding, WikiLeaks emails show https://nypost.com/2016/11/06/chelsea-clinton-used-foundation-to-help-pay-for-wedding-emails/ Chelsea Clinton used foundation to help pay for wedding: email There you have it. Two UNIMPEACHABLE sources. I can't believe anyone would be stupid enough to believe that THIS TRAILER TRASH https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-2001-feb-10-mn-23723-story.html Quote WASHINGTON — President Clinton and his wife started shipping White House furniture to the Clintons’ newly purchased home in New York more than a year ago, despite questions at the time by the White House chief usher about whether they were entitled to remove the items. The day before the items were shipped out, chief usher Gary Walters said he questioned whether the Clintons should be taking the furnishings because he believed they were government property donated as part of a White House redecoration project in 1993, during Clinton’s first year in office. But Walters was told by the White House counsel’s office that the items he asked about--which included an iron-and-glass coffee table, a painted TV armoire, a custom wood gaming table and a wicker table with wood top--were “personal gifts received by the Clintons prior to President Clinton assuming office.” wouldn't be capable of such a stunt. Then again, there are a lot of stupid people here. And they vote, usually sending out 100 ballots per election. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
robosmith Posted November 27, 2022 Report Share Posted November 27, 2022 (edited) 1 hour ago, reason10 said: https://www.foxnews.com/politics/clinton-aide-says-foundation-paid-for-chelseas-wedding-wikileaks-emails-show Clinton aide says Foundation paid for Chelsea’s wedding, WikiLeaks emails show https://nypost.com/2016/11/06/chelsea-clinton-used-foundation-to-help-pay-for-wedding-emails/ Chelsea Clinton used foundation to help pay for wedding: email There you have it. Two UNIMPEACHABLE sources. I can't believe anyone would be stupid enough to believe that THIS TRAILER TRASH https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-2001-feb-10-mn-23723-story.html wouldn't be capable of such a stunt. Then again, there are a lot of stupid people here. And they vote, usually sending out 100 ballots per election. Your "unimpeachable sources" SAY ONLY there was an INVESTIGATION. Quote “The investigation into her getting paid for campaigning, using foundation resources for her wedding and life for a decade, taxes on money from her parents…,” Band wrote to John Podesta, now Hillary Clinton’s campaign chairman. “I hope that you will speak to her and end this. Once we go down this road…” Band’s message is contained in a chain of emails that were hacked from Podesta’s Gmail account. WikiLeaks has released more than 50,000 of the stolen emails over the past 32 days. Apparently you DON'T UNDERSTAND that is WAS RUSSIA'S INDICTED Internet Research Agency which STOLE those emails and DUMPED them ON WIKILEAKS. Of course you TRUST PUTIN, but ONLY because YOU'RE STUPID. Edited November 27, 2022 by robosmith Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hodad Posted November 28, 2022 Report Share Posted November 28, 2022 (edited) 20 hours ago, reason10 said: https://www.foxnews.com/politics/clinton-aide-says-foundation-paid-for-chelseas-wedding-wikileaks-emails-show Clinton aide says Foundation paid for Chelsea’s wedding, WikiLeaks emails show https://nypost.com/2016/11/06/chelsea-clinton-used-foundation-to-help-pay-for-wedding-emails/ Chelsea Clinton used foundation to help pay for wedding: email There you have it. Two UNIMPEACHABLE sources. I can't believe anyone would be stupid enough to believe that THIS TRAILER TRASH https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-2001-feb-10-mn-23723-story.html wouldn't be capable of such a stunt. Then again, there are a lot of stupid people here. And they vote, usually sending out 100 ballots per election. Boy, those those are serious accusations. If a person were to be found guilty of misusing charitable funds, what should happen to them? Should they go to jail? Should they be disqualified from holding public office? Or are you cool with it? Edited November 28, 2022 by Hodad 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
reason10 Posted November 28, 2022 Author Report Share Posted November 28, 2022 8 hours ago, Hodad said: Boy, those those are Sergio's accusations. If a person were to be found guilty of misusing charitable funds, what should happen to them? Should they go to jail? Should they be disqualified from holding public office? Or are you cool with it? The KKKlintons are criminals who have belonged behind bars long before they got into politics. But membership into the DemoNazi party has its perks. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
reason10 Posted November 28, 2022 Author Report Share Posted November 28, 2022 18 hours ago, robosmith said: Your "unimpeachable sources" SAY ONLY there was an INVESTIGATION. Apparently you DON'T UNDERSTAND that is WAS RUSSIA'S INDICTED Internet Research Agency which STOLE those emails and DUMPED them ON WIKILEAKS. Of course you TRUST PUTIN, but ONLY because YOU'RE STUPID. Yeah, right. And there is such a thing as the Tooth Fairy. Oh, and you didn't find the name Putin in either of these articles. You just inserted the name. See what that METH can do to you? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rebound Posted November 28, 2022 Report Share Posted November 28, 2022 2 hours ago, reason10 said: The KKKlintons are criminals who have belonged behind bars long before they got into politics. But membership into the DemoNazi party has its perks. Answer the question: ”If a person were to be found guilty of misusing charitable funds, what should happen to them? Should they go to jail? Should they be disqualified from holding public office? Or are you cool with it?” Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
robosmith Posted November 28, 2022 Report Share Posted November 28, 2022 5 hours ago, reason10 said: Yeah, right. And there is such a thing as the Tooth Fairy. Oh, and you didn't find the name Putin in either of these articles. You just inserted the name. See what that METH can do to you? Yeah, I see that it makes YOU deny that Putin runs the indicted Russian government's Internet Research Agency. Maybe if you weren't so uneducated, you'd KNOW that Putin runs the Russian government. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.thumb.jpg.9a49e1b2f22a6d34a345152c50044aa9.jpg)
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.