The Epitome of Leftist Hypocrisy

[New World Disorder]

6 hours ago, Rue said:

I still would really love to know who these elitists are because I am convinced many who we think they are,  are not, and others we see as oppressed are actually elitists.

Some people claim the Rothchilds, Rockefeller, Liz Windsor,  the Vanderbilts, Bush, Satanist Mason Shapeshifter Draco Zionist white privileged men  are these elitists. 

I tend to think elitists in one sense are  anyone who coerces another for personal benefit which means every person on the  planet and then on another level  is actually constantly changing alliances of mutual interest groups. 

Either way it's too vague for me. I want names and addresses.

I suspect already Greg the Moderator. 

https://www.fastcompany.com/90494347/american-billionaires-have-gotten-280-billion-richer-since-the-start-of-the-covid-19-pandemic

 

[Argus]

On 6/7/2020 at 9:29 PM, Michael Hardner said:

Calling the Democrats 'leftists' is itself hyperbolic.  They are, by many measures, in the same league as Canadian Conservatives.

I don't know any Canadian conservatives calling for reparations, wanting to defund police, or demanding more racial hiring quotas, much less more laws against 'offensive' speech.

[WestCanMan]

On 6/8/2020 at 11:58 AM, Michael Hardner said:

Divided America... brought to you by... checks notes... uh... Colin Powell, Mitt Romney, several jailed and unjailed former associates and secretaries of the current administration who describe the leader as 'immature'.... 

That's some reach the Democrats have, though.  

Divided America, brought to you by: the people who brought you the story of "The poor gentle giant who was just walking with his friends until a white racist cop drove up and shot him while his hands were in the air."

Did that really happen? Not according to video of M Brown right before he got shot. It appears that he was anything but a gentle giant. But if you watch CNN, you didn't get to see those videos while the riots were still going on. Theoretically it was disrespectful to the dead man. Or were they just trying to blow the story up so that they could profit from the 24/7 viewership? Maybe. But the end result was division. With heaping sides of anger and violence. They never really got around to painting a clearer version of the events on CNN. They let the original story carry on. The rioting, looting and arson went on, unabated. Cops got killed. 

Was Treyvon Martin just minding his own business when that white supremacist Mexican shot him for no reason? Only two people know and one of them is dead. So let's completely discount the white supremacist Mexican's story and go with Obama's version of the story. "Trayvon was just a kid, like a young version of me, who wasn't causing any trouble, who got shot for no reason." Obama's version makes so much sense. It's so compelling. It's the kind of thing that you can just see happening, right? "Hey look a cute little [17 yr old] black kid with some Skittles" **BLAMMO! "Yeah I can do that, I'm a cop." CNN showed pictures of him where he could have been no more than 12 yrs old for months. I still have no idea what Treyvon looked like after he hit puberty. 

When Barack Obama stood in front of 4 or 5 dead cops at a Dallas eulogy, why did he bring up "centuries of racism, slavery and Jim Crowe laws"? If we're on the topic of being respectful of the dead and all, why bring up stuff that has absolutely nothing to do with those dead people? It's from over 150 years ago. The cops are only 30 yrs old. I'm pretty sure that none of those cops helped make those laws. 

Do you honestly think Obama and CNN aren't divisive? C'mon Michael. Let's go kid. 

Edited June 9, 2020 by WestCanMan

[WestCanMan]

3 hours ago, Argus said:

I don't know any Canadian conservatives calling for reparations, wanting to defund police, or demanding more racial hiring quotas, much less more laws against 'offensive' speech.

Or last minute abortions, open borders, free medical and dental for illegal immigrants plus the right to vote - no ID required, free university for everyone who crosses the border, you can just mail in votes because that's pretty infallible, everyone gets a living wage from the first moment they start working, let's spend $100 trillion on transitioning to green energy, you gotta ban guns because that van killed a lot of people, etc, etc, etc.

The Dems are like a bad skit on SNL about how stupid a Jr High School's student union is. "Hey Tiffany, let's liiike allow kids from other schools to vote. And people can just, liiiiiike, mail in their ballots. We'll ban nuclear weapons from the lunch room and we'll get limos to drive us here instead of pukey school buses OMG I wanna liiiiike hurl." 

 

[WestCanMan]

On 6/7/2020 at 6:12 PM, Rue said:

I think saying Dems or Reps endorse violence is equally as problematic.

Here's Michelle Obama being a piece of shit again. She's just not happy unless people are divided:

Quote

Michelle then took the "virtual stage" to address the Black Lives Matter movement and all its efforts to fight police brutality and racial injustice during the ongoing protests over the killing of George Floyd in Minneapolis.

Yeah that's what BLM is famous for, fighting against police brutality. What a crock.

[WestCanMan]

Here are some more words of wisdom from that hideous b:

Quote

"Graduates, anger is a powerful force. It can be a useful force, but left on its own it will only corrode and destroy and sow chaos on the inside and out. But, when anger is focused, when it's channeled into something more, that is the stuff that changes history," she said. Michelle used the lives of Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. and Sojourner Truth as examples of past leaders who were angry but also "driven by compassion, by principle, by hope."

If this isn't a dog whistle to rioters and looters I don't know what is.

[eyeball]

1 hour ago, WestCanMan said:

If this isn't a dog whistle to rioters and looters I don't know what is.

I'm leaning towards you not knowing.  Anger 'left on it's own' in the context of 'compassion, principle and hope' clearly eludes you. 

Edited June 11, 2020 by eyeball

[WestCanMan]

2 hours ago, eyeball said:

I'm leaning towards you not knowing.  Anger 'left on it's own' in the context of 'compassion, principle and hope' clearly eludes you. 

You're the expert on not knowing.

She's blatantly praising BLM and talking primarily about anger, during a time of rioting and looting. It's not productive to tell Americans that the BLM is a leader in the community, especially while businesses are still burning by their hand. 

Her husband, who praised and also attempted to legitimize BLM, presided over two and a half straight years of rioting & looting. The Obama's core group of followers are rioters and looters to the bone. They aren't focusing on words like 'compassion and principle'. Those kids come out of that speech looking for a chance to show anger and fury, it's their highest calling. They're being indoctrinated to hate.

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/michelle-obama-class-of-2020-virtual-commencement-youtube-video/

Can you find the part here where she talks positively about the VAST MAJORITY of police, where she denounces the violence against police, where she takes a firm stance against the destruction of property or the murders of police officers and citizens? Or just anywhere that she offers the mildest attempt at de-escalating the situation? 

That stanky ho isn't happy that the rioting is dying down. She's doing everything that she can to fan the flames. Maybe America just isn't divided enough to be polarized into more looting and chaos by her vile tongue. The power that the Obamas have over America is waning. The riots are fizzling. 

[eyeball]

22 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

You're the expert on not knowing.

With you providing an example of what not knowing looks like it's easy. If you can't see that Michelle Obama is talking about expressing anger in a principled manner its because you're being willfully ignorant. The fact the protests have become more peaceful as well as more widespread is a testament to the appeal of her message.  

It's not the least bit surprising to see you denigrating the legitimacy of black lives when attempts to get people to focus their anger constructively starts to bear fruitful results.

Edited June 11, 2020 by eyeball

[WestCanMan]

31 minutes ago, eyeball said:

With you providing an example of what not knowing looks like it's easy. If you can't see that Michelle Obama is talking about expressing anger in a principled manner its because you're being willfully ignorant. The fact the protests have become more peaceful as well as more widespread is a testament to the appeal of her message.  

It's not the least bit surprising to see you denigrating the legitimacy of black lives when attempts to get people to focus their anger constructively starts to bear fruitful results.

If you can't see Michelle's fear-mongering for what it is, that's the epitome of willful ignorance.

FYI the Obamas had 3 years to stop rioting, looting and violence against police when they were in the WH and they didn't lift a finger. They focused on righteous anger instead of the damage being done to legitimate businesses. They fanned the flames. They reared their ugly heads in 2020 to fan the flames again. 

The 2020 riots died down because of heavy police presence, the dispersal of crowds before dusk, and stern disapproval from the Whitehouse instead of steadfast support. 

You failed to find the evidence of: 

Quote

Can you find the part here where she talks positively about the VAST MAJORITY of police, where she denounces the violence against police, where she takes a firm stance against the destruction of property or the murders of police officers and citizens? Or just anywhere that she offers the mildest attempt at de-escalating the situation? 

 No shocker, failing is what you do here. 

I point out evidence of things, you throw down childish insults. 

[eyeball]

50 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

If you can't see Michelle's fear-mongering for what it is, that's the epitome of willful ignorance.

What fear-mongering? It's the exact opposite of that.

Quote

You failed to find the evidence of:

No I chose to ignore your BS and stay focused on the post I replied to, the one where you threw down your hideous bitch comment.  

[WestCanMan]

8 hours ago, eyeball said:

What fear-mongering? It's the exact opposite of that.

If you look at this in context, the nation was gripped by the worst rioting, looting, arson and cop-killing spree since the Obama WH while she was giving that speech. She didn't talk about the horrific violence and needless destruction, she talked about justified anger. 

Quote

No I chose to ignore your BS and stay focused on the post I replied to, the one where you threw down your hideous bitch comment.  

No, you chose not to take on the challenge because you know that you'd lose again, as usual. You don't have a single fact to point to. You just choose insult and ignore. 

Go back and look at your whole history of posts eyeball, that's your pattern - ignore the facts and try a childish ad-hominem attack. The effectiveness of your debating strategy peaked in grade 5 and you stopped improving. You're at an elementary school level bud. 

Michelle is a hideous bitch, I made that clear.

[eyeball]

11 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

If you look at this in context, the nation was gripped by the worst rioting, looting, arson and cop-killing spree since the Obama WH while she was giving that speech. She didn't talk about the horrific violence and needless destruction, she talked about justified anger. 

That's because it is justified.  What isn't justified is the context you're applying to her words when its plainly clear she is calling for people to focus and channel their anger constructively. 

Quote

No, you chose not to take on the challenge because you know that you'd lose again, as usual. You don't have a single fact to point to. You just choose insult and ignore. 

I'm pointing at your retarded interpretation of what she said.

Quote

Go back and look at your whole history of posts eyeball, that's your pattern - ignore the facts and try a childish ad-hominem attack. The effectiveness of your debating strategy peaked in grade 5 and you stopped improving. You're at an elementary school level bud. 

Well, that's a lot more educated and wiser than the kindergarten level you're apparently at.

Quote

Michelle is a hideous bitch, I made that clear.

Yes you did.

[WestCanMan]

23 minutes ago, eyeball said:

That's because it is justified.  What isn't justified is the context you're applying to her words when its plainly clear she is calling for people to focus and channel their anger constructively. 

I'm pointing at your retarded interpretation of what she said.

Well, that's a lot more educated and wiser than the kindergarten level you're apparently at.

Yes you did.

This topic is just clearly over your head eyeball. 

There are plenty of reasons why the last three years of the Obama White House was just an exercise in riotng, looting, cop-hatred and arson.

You didn’t understand it then, and you don’t understand it now.

FYI this whole latest round of riding a cop killing is predicated on the notion that this was purely a racist killing by Chauvin. There’s no evidence of that, and this isn’t the first time that police have killed somebody like this in the last few years.

Do you think it was also racism when the police killed a white guy like this? Do you think that there should’ve been BLM riots and cop-killing riots (with righteous anger) back then as well? 

Edited June 11, 2020 by WestCanMan

[eyeball]

3 hours ago, WestCanMan said:

This topic is just clearly over your head eyeball. 

Just over my head is the same as saying in the clouds over your's.

Quote

There are plenty of reasons why the last three years of the Obama White House was just an exercise in riotng, looting, cop-hatred and arson.

You didn’t understand it then, and you don’t understand it now.

I understand you perceive and interpret things that way but I also think you're a really fucked-up right-wing loon so....it is what it is.  BTW do you imagine you're unique or representative of mainstream conservative thinking on issues and topics like these?  I'm pretty sure people like Jinping or Putin would have me killed if I tried to spread my ideas about transparency in their societies so I'm pretty sure I'm not the typical sheeple/commie you people characterize me as.

Quote

FYI this whole latest round of riding a cop killing is predicated on the notion that this was purely a racist killing by Chauvin. There’s no evidence of that, and this isn’t the first time that police have killed somebody like this in the last few years.

That's one of the reasons they call it systemic racism.  What seems clearer now is that Chauvin had a history of abusing black people with his authoritah and Floyd had a history of preventing Chauvin from abusing it.  It suggests Chauvin was motivated by revenge as much as anything.  

Quote

Do you think it was also racism when the police killed a white guy like this? Do you think that there should’ve been BLM riots and cop-killing riots (with righteous anger) back then as well? 

No I think this is a more fundamental abuse of power that's indicative of systemic authoritarianism - something I think there should be even angrier protests against - in fact I'm pretty sure that's at least half of what's motivating people to join these protests here and around the world and that resistance against the abuse of power will be the final product of this coalescence of reasons uniting people in common cause around much of the world.  Humanity has been progressing in this direction essentially forever now.  I've said it before and I'll keep on saying it Kumbaya is rising and you can either get used to it or slash your wrists over it for all I care.

Anyhow if the lock-down protest a few weeks before Floyd's murder was the big right-wing backlash it was sure lame compared to the left-wing backlash sweeping much of the planet now. I suppose the fact even the Army is reluctant to get between the people and the government now means it'll be up to 2nd Amendment folks to save the day.  What are the chances of that do you think?

[WestCanMan]

16 minutes ago, eyeball said:

I understand you perceive and interpret things

I understand that you don't

Quote

you're a really fucked-up right-wing loon

Right on cue you go to the sandbox insult vault because you can't answer the question asked of you. Or you could, but the answer would be incriminating, so you dodge. 

Quote

so....it is what it is.  BTW do you imagine you're unique or representative of mainstream conservative thinking on issues and topics like these?  I'm pretty sure people like Jinping or Putin would have me killed if I tried to spread my ideas about transparency in their societies so I'm pretty sure I'm not the typical sheeple/commie you people characterize me as.

I'm just a person who's not afraid to tell the sad truth about Michelle and Barack Obama. 

Quote

That's one of the reasons they call it systemic racism.  What seems clearer now is that Chauvin had a history of abusing black people with his authoritah and Floyd had a history of preventing Chauvin from abusing it.  It suggests Chauvin was motivated by revenge as much as anything.  

What seems clearer now is that when people tell stories that you like they're "100%VERIFIED!!!!!!!" and when you're presented with facts which are known to be true which don't please you, you call people names.

Quote

No I think this is a more fundamental abuse of power that's indicative of systemic authoritarianism

The way that George was killed was PROOF POSITIVE that there was no other possible reason aside from racism. Right? 

If killing one person that way can only be racism, then killing another person that exact same way has to be racism as well, don't you think? How can it possibly be something else?

Are you questioning your own theory, and thinking that the way George was killed wasn't proof of racism? Hmmmmm. 

Quote

I've said it before and I'll keep on saying it Kumbaya is rising and you can either get used to it or slash your wrists over it for all I care.

Kumbaya is here eyeball. Just admit it.

Chauvin isn't the reason why you failed to launch.

Quote

Anyhow if the lock-down protest a few weeks before Floyd's murder was the big right-wing backlash it was sure lame compared to the left-wing backlash sweeping much of the planet now.

Who said that was a right-wing anything? It was a backlash against government overreach. I thought that kind of thing was right up your alley? Are you saying that you're a dreaded right winger? Can't be too sure. Take off your watch now, and do the right thing. 

Quote

I suppose the fact even the Army is reluctant to get between the people and the government now means it'll be up to 2nd Amendment folks to save the day.  What are the chances of that do you think?

The window of opportunity for rioters to attack people's homes with impunity ended in Jan 2017. Sorry little guy. 

[eyeball]

18 hours ago, WestCanMan said:

Right on cue you go to the sandbox insult vault because you can't answer the question asked of you. Or you could, but the answer would be incriminating, so you dodge.  What seems clearer now is that when people tell stories that you like they're "100%VERIFIED!!!!!!!" and when you're presented with facts which are known to be true which don't please you, you call people names.

Whatever question you're talking about was probably ignored because it had nothing to do with anything.  You do that a lot and I regard it as insulting.  After a couple times of that I call you a moron or something.  Think of it as being like a shovel upside your stupid head trying to make you focus on the issue instead of some feature on your hokey as shit string and post-it note maps.  

Quote

The way that George was killed was PROOF POSITIVE that there was no other possible reason aside from racism. Right?

No it's quite possible he was murdered out of revenge. 

Quote

If killing one person that way can only be racism, then killing another person that exact same way has to be racism as well, don't you think? How can it possibly be something else?

Hey pay attention stupid this is the time now I've had to repeat that it's entirely possible Floyd was killed because of a grudge Chauvin had against him, the likelihood that Chauvin also appears to be a racist is secondary to him simply being a fucking asshole.  The fact three other cops didn't intervene however isn't and is plenty of cause for the protests against racism.

Quote

Are you questioning your own theory, and thinking that the way George was killed wasn't proof of racism? Hmmmmm. 

No as I just said the element of racism is certainly reflected in the inaction of other other cops who just stood there and watched. 

Quote

Kumbaya is here eyeball. Just admit it.

I was saying as much months ago.

Quote

Chauvin isn't the reason why you failed to launch.

Excuse me but launch what?

Quote

Who said that was a right-wing anything? It was a backlash against government overreach. I thought that kind of thing was right up your alley?

A backlash that was clearly targeted at so-called Blue state legislatures. You didn't get the sense from Fox pundits that these protests were directed at extreme radical Democrats?  In any case it's no skin off my nose if America flushes itself down the toilet.  If Canada's legislature were stormed by gunmen however I'd expect them to be arrested and probably killed if they resisted. Good riddance too.

Edited June 12, 2020 by eyeball

[WestCanMan]

44 minutes ago, eyeball said:

Whatever question you're talking about was probably ignored because it had nothing to do with anything.  You do that a lot and I regard it as insulting.  After a couple times of that I call you a moron or something.  Think of it as being like a shovel upside your stupid head trying to make you focus on the issue instead of some feature on your hokey as shit string and post-it note maps.  

No it's quite possible he was murdered out of revenge. Hey pay attention stupid this is the time now I've had to repeat that it's entirely possible Floyd was killed because of a grudge Chauvin had against him, the likelihood that Chauvin also appears to be a racist is secondary to him simply being a fucking asshole. 

So why is it that "it had to be racism" until another possible scenario was dumped in your lap? There was a nearly infinite number of other possible scenarios before people from the bar spoke up. We didn't know about them eyeball. FYI there's not just 1 scenario now, is there? 

Maybe Floyd was selling drugs to teenage girls and some of them died of Fentanyl. You don't know, do you?

Maybe Cauvin was a pedophile and Floyd was trying to convince a little girl to testify against him. You just don't know. 

The whole point of this exercise is - don't fucking pretend that you KNOW when you don't fucking KNOW.

Quote

The fact three other cops didn't intervene however isn't and is plenty of cause for the protests against racism.

Two of the other cops were rookies. Chauvin was a 19-yr vet. One of them mentioned twice that maybe they should roll him over. In the military and police, rookies don't order their superiors around.

Quote

A backlash that was clearly targeted at so-called Blue state legislatures. You didn't get the sense from Fox pundits that these protests were directed at extreme radical Democrats?  

A backlash happened against states that had completely ridiculous covid laws. People should be allowed to work in their own gardens. The government in the US doesn't get to strip individuals of every freedom that they are entitled to just because a really strong version of the common cold comes along.

[eyeball]

26 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

So why is it that "it had to be racism" until another possible scenario was dumped in your lap?

WTF are you babbling about? It has to be about racism because  of the stupid way you think and look at everything.  I didn't touch this topic until just the other day and if anything I've been referring to it more as systemic authoritarianism than anything.

Quote

 

There was a nearly infinite number of other possible scenarios before people from the bar spoke up. We didn't know about them eyeball. FYI there's not just 1 scenario now, is there? 

Maybe Floyd was selling drugs to teenage girls and some of them died of Fentanyl. You don't know, do you?

Maybe Cauvin was a pedophile and Floyd was trying to convince a little girl to testify against him. You just don't know. 

The whole point of this exercise is - don't fucking pretend that you KNOW when you don't fucking KNOW.

 

Listen up shit-for-brains I didn't comment on this until days after you'd been shooting your stupid know it all face off about it so fuck-off.

Quote

Two of the other cops were rookies. Chauvin was a 19-yr vet. One of them mentioned twice that maybe they should roll him over. In the military and police, rookies don't order their superiors around.

Yeah well I bet they're thinking hard about the wisdom of being a sheep and following the herd eh?  When veteran cops teach rookies to take down perps like this it only underscores the systemic nature of their abusive method of policing. 

Quote

A backlash happened against states that had completely ridiculous covid laws. People should be allowed to work in their own gardens. The government in the US doesn't get to strip individuals of every freedom that they are entitled to just because a really strong version of the common cold comes along.

I'd be a little pissed to if I'd been encouraged to believe this was nothing but a cold that I was told had been 'totally under control' for months..

Edited June 12, 2020 by eyeball

[WestCanMan]

2 hours ago, eyeball said:

WTF are you babbling about? It has to be about racism because  of the stupid way you think and look at everything.  I didn't touch this topic until just the other day and if anything I've been referring to it more as systemic authoritarianism than anything.

Listen up shit-for-brains I didn't comment on this until days after you'd been shooting your stupid know it all face off about it so fuck-off.

You're lying again.

You chimed in to support Michelle Obama, and Michelle Obama is basing her call to high school kids to go out a get angry and focus that anger all based on the assumption that this was a racist attack.

You're back to name-calling because you just got caught between telling the truth or backing the ignorant bitch who's supporting rioting, looting, arson and cop-killing.

Quote

Yeah well I bet they're thinking hard about the wisdom of being a sheep and following the herd eh?  When veteran cops teach rookies to take down perps like this it only underscores the systemic nature of their abusive method of policing. 

I bet they just weren't thinking that Floyd was going to die. They were probably guilty of believing that their boss knew what he was doing, and they didn't know he was a murderer. Not a lot of people suspect that the person they're with is a murderer. 

Quote

I'd be a little pissed to if I'd been encouraged to believe this was nothing but a cold that I was told had been 'totally under control' for months..

What is it, really?

Our government treated it like it was babyshit until March 16th, two full months after we learned about it. They literally did nothing at all. 

Then they started acting like it was Ebola. 

Now that the results are in, it's just a nudge for people who are already walking on the edge of their grave, and it's severe for a handful of random people who are already sick but not deathly ill.

Global pandemic? Not the current strain.

[eyeball]

On 6/12/2020 at 11:55 AM, WestCanMan said:

You're lying again.

Fuck you.

[Michael Hardner]

On 6/12/2020 at 2:55 PM, WestCanMan said:

You're lying again.

.... the ignorant bitch who's supporting rioting, looting, arson and cop-killing.

 

“I’m exhausted by a heartbreak that never seems to stop,” wrote former First Lady Michelle Obama to her 39.3 million Instagram followers. “If we ever hope to move past it, it can’t just be on people of color to deal with it. It’s up to all of us—black, white, everyone—no matter how well-meaning we think we might be, to do the honest, uncomfortable work of rooting it out. It starts with self-examination and listening to those whose lives are different from our own. It ends with justice, compassion and empathy that manifests in our lives and on our streets.”Michelle Obama’s former U.S. president husband also addressed America’s young men and women of color in a video livestream last night saying, “I want you to know that you matter. I want you to know that your lives matter. That your dreams matter.”

 

Her message sounds pretty milquetoast to me.  Eyeball - maybe we should block and ignore racist liars, do you think - I mean in general ?  Not pointing to any particular man on here.  But divisive bullshit should just be ignored @eyeball  76% of AMERICANS thing racism is a big problem.

[WestCanMan]

58 minutes ago, Michael Hardner said:

“I’m exhausted by a heartbreak that never seems to stop,” wrote former First Lady Michelle Obama to her 39.3 million Instagram followers. “If we ever hope to move past it, it can’t just be on people of color to deal with it. It’s up to all of us—black, white, everyone—no matter how well-meaning we think we might be, to do the honest, uncomfortable work of rooting it out. It starts with self-examination and listening to those whose lives are different from our own. It ends with justice, compassion and empathy that manifests in our lives and on our streets.”Michelle Obama’s former U.S. president husband also addressed America’s young men and women of color in a video livestream last night saying, “I want you to know that you matter. I want you to know that your lives matter. That your dreams matter.”

Ooooh, she has a quote that's not ignorant & inflammatory. That must mean that everything she says is so positive. Thanks MH.

Actually guess what Einstein: Hitler probably has some cute cuddly quotes and he probably brought flowers home for his mommy sometimes when he was a kid. It doesn't make his more sinister messages to the public any less revolting. 

Your post was meaningless and your childish insult is just a measure of your own character.

Her quote was indefensible. She was talking to high school kids and advocating for anger, and focused anger. 

There was no talk about how to stay safe if you're involved with the police. No talk about the need for calm and to let justice run it's course. She just talked to potentially millions of kids and the message they came away with was stay mad, or get even madder. 

Quote

Her message sounds pretty milquetoast to me.  Eyeball - maybe we should block and ignore racist liars, do you think - I mean in general ?  Not pointing to any particular man on here.  But divisive bullshit should just be ignored @eyeball  76% of AMERICANS thing racism is a big problem.

You and eyeball can start your own chat forum where you can talk about how important it is to incite anger & fear of the police in young black kids, and the shock and horror of the worst genocide in the history of the world (30 people back in 1692). 

IE, your divisive bullshit will be unnoticed by the general public and you can lie all you want, unquestioned. You won't even need your blankie/soother.

It won't be like here where your childish bullshit gets squashed all the time.