Jump to content

Is Nancy Pelosi fearful of MapleLeafWeb forums? ...hmmm...


Recommended Posts

Has Nancy been dropping in on this intrepid forum??

 

The other day, I published a thread about disbanding the Dem party, thanks to Dem's impeachment hoax keeping their Fed GOVT preoccupied at the same time COVID-19 was unfurling/needed all hands on deck. Well, guess what Pelosi specifically addressed today?  You guessed it; why we should not blame the impeachment process for COVID-19 not getting the correct attention! lol

 

 

 

 

 

Edited by Tdot
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Tdot said:

Вы Нэнси ?

Oh, I'm sorry, did I spell that wrong? Hmmm......! Thanks for correcting me. 

Okay, I see that Google is translating this as "Are you Nancy?" So no. But do you Russians know that Canada isn't an extension of the U.S.? This site is Canadian and is not the same country. Thus, you are likely a foreigner attempting to rattle up an issue you THOUGHT we were a part of. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Scott Mayers said:

... you Russians ... 

Uh, no. I have never been to Russia ---but I am a Canadian citizen and a USA citizen.  You know what that is called, legally?

If so, good.  If not? Then please feel free to help rattle up an issue that both of my countries are a part of by you focusing on the, topic, instead of you focusing on me. 

Edited by Tdot
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Tdot said:

Uh, no. I have never been to Russia ---but I am a Canadian citizen and a USA citizen.  Do you know what is called, legally?

Now please feel free to help rattle up an issue that both of my countries are a part of by you focusing on the, topic, instead of you focusing on me. 

You are presenting yourself in the STYLE of 'hardcopy' ragmag rhetoric. You know, the kind of rhetoric that might assert how Katy Perry might have an illegitimate child of President Obama's. [I just made this up as a point of your rhetoric.] For a more real example, the declaration that Hillary Clinton had conspired to set up a child pornography network by right-wing propaganda. I know,....you might be dumb enough to believe in this, right? But not all of us are this naive. So when presenting some accusation of some crime, AND one that treats a whole political class as being corrupt when it defends "democratic" principles, you require proving why your strict bias isn't motivating your odd claims. 

If the Democratic party as a whole is fraudulent, we ARE in trouble as a whole, simply for the fact that the alternative Republican view intrinsically believes in utilizing ragmag rhetoric that appeals to the least skeptical mind. I already know that much of today's problems are due to the nature of the left to absorb those right-wingers who are NOT normally IN power. Today's trends have many extremists collectivising among the left but are NOT believers in the concept of 'democratic' independence. As such, there will always be a tendency for people in ALL parties to be deceptive to some degree. But it is the 'right' wing perspective to believe in CONSERVING their power by encouraging masses to favor faith in the stupidist claims in principle

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Scott Mayers said:

You are presenting yourself in the STYLE of 'hardcopy' ragmag rhetoric. You know, the kind of rhetoric that might assert how Katy Perry might have an illegitimate child of President Obama's. [I just made this up as a point of your rhetoric.] For a more real example, the declaration that Hillary Clinton had conspired to set up a child pornography network by right-wing propaganda. I know,....you might be dumb enough to believe in this, right? But not all of us are this naive. So when presenting some accusation of some crime, AND one that treats a whole political class as being corrupt when it defends "democratic" principles, you require proving why your strict bias isn't motivating your odd claims. 

If the Democratic party as a whole is fraudulent, we ARE in trouble as a whole, simply for the fact that the alternative Republican view intrinsically believes in utilizing ragmag rhetoric that appeals to the least skeptical mind. I already know that much of today's problems are due to the nature of the left to absorb those right-wingers who are NOT normally IN power. Today's trends have many extremists collectivising among the left but are NOT believers in the concept of 'democratic' independence. As such, there will always be a tendency for people in ALL parties to be deceptive to some degree. But it is the 'right' wing perspective to believe in CONSERVING their power by encouraging masses to favor faith in the stupidist claims in principle

Stop focusing on, me, and focus only on the topic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, Tdot said:

Stop focusing on, me, and focus only on the topic.

While the motive of someone does not always refer to the argument's validity,  it IS relevant when determining whether what you SPECIFICALLY claim is a 'fact' that you expect others to disprove as though what you say SHOULD be trusted by default. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Scott Mayers said:

But do you Russians know that Canada isn't an extension of the U.S.? This site is Canadian and is not the same country. Thus, you are likely a foreigner attempting to rattle up an issue you THOUGHT we were a part of. 

Ahem...excuse me but this is a Canadian site hosted on American domain servers (that were probably built in China) and Tdot is actually Bush_Cheney 2007 posting from his cottage in Canada.  He left his wife behind to 'man' his bunker while he did the Sophie.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

58 minutes ago, eyeball said:

Ahem...excuse me but this is a Canadian site hosted on American domain servers (that were probably built in China) and Tdot is actually Bush_Cheney 2007 posting from his cottage in Canada.  He left his wife behind to 'man' his bunker while he did the Sophie.

B_C did Sophie? So you're saying that Idris Alba posts here? 

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, eyeball said:

Ahem...excuse me but this is a Canadian site hosted on American domain servers (that were probably built in China) and Tdot is actually Bush_Cheney 2007 posting from his cottage in Canada.  He left his wife behind to 'man' his bunker while he did the Sophie.

Of course I don't know who the heck are Bush_Cheney 2007 and Sophie, but hey, at least you sure did make it sound good. lol.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,730
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    NakedHunterBiden
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...