Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

The investigation is on.  Right now, for me it's a matter of "he says-she says."

However, the double standard being practiced by Jagmeet Singh is obvious.  Christine Moore had conducted a press conference (talked to the press), despite the fact that the allegation is under investigation - that's the very reason Weir was kicked from caucus.   And yet, Moore is still around.

 

Jagmeet Singh had given  a stupid statement before - "You have to believe  survivors."   He forgot to add........."women survivors."   If this is the way Jagmeet Singh practice his leadership - we can see that there is a serious problem with his sense of judgement. 

If you're a male against a female.....you won't get a fair shake with him.   This is something men should take very seriously.

Edited by betsy
Posted
1 hour ago, betsy said:

The investigation is on.  Right now, for me it's a matter of "he says-she says."

However, the double standard being practiced by Jagmeet Singh is obvious.  Christine Moore had conducted a press conference (talked to the press), despite the fact that the allegation is under investigation - that's the very reason Weir was kicked from caucus.   And yet, Moore is still around.

Uh, no. She isn't. She was suspended from caucus immediately. Try and get your facts straight before commenting. 

"I think it's fun watching the waldick get all excited/knickers in a knot over something." -scribblet
Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, BubberMiley said:

Uh, no. She isn't. She was suspended from caucus immediately. Try and get your facts straight before commenting. 

 (Double checked).  You're right.  I was wrong. 

I was relying on the comment by one of the pundits at Power Play yesterday.

 

 

Quote

 

Weir says he's being removed not because of findings, but because he spoke to media

 

 

 

http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/erin-weir-caucus-ndp-1.4646224

 

They're talking about the confusion on the so-called findings against Weir. 

What does this suppose to mean?

 


 

Quote

 

“Mr. Weir had failed to read non-verbal cues in social situations and that his behaviour had had a negative impact on the people who made the complaints,” said Singh.

“The report states that when he realized that his advances were unwanted, he stopped.”

 

 

 

https://globalnews.ca/news/4184251/erin-weir-expelled-from-ndp-caucus-after-investigation-into-harassment-complaints/

 

They're not really buying it.   Thus the pundit made a comparison with Moore.....and supported the views of the vet soldier that had it been that the soldier is female and Moore is male, they speculate this will be treated differently.

What non-verbal cues?   Can anyone give an example?

To hell with so-called non-verbal "cues." You're not interested?   Spell it out!  Say it!

 

 

Edited by betsy

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,907
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    derek848
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

    • Benz earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Videospirit earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Barquentine earned a badge
      Posting Machine
    • stindles earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • stindles earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...