Jump to content

Kimmel's Flat Jokes at the Oscars


betsy

Recommended Posts

33 minutes ago, betsy said:

After all those hours of Trump-bashing.......

Did you get the news that there was "all those hours of Trump bashing" at the Oscars from the same source Trump got his news that Trump Tower was wire-tapped? :lol:

Edited by BubberMiley
Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, BubberMiley said:

Did you get the news that there was "all those hours of Trump bashing" at the Oscars from the same source Trump got his news that Trump Tower was wire-tapped? :lol:

Certainly not from the source of the fake news you read that says Stone admits to colluding with Assange.  :lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, BubberMiley said:

Actually that was a primary source (i.e., his own tweet), so it's pretty hard to call it fake news.

 

Then it's you - you're the one who's spreading fake news!  He never said he "colluded."  Here's the deleted tweet.

 

Quote

In one post, later deleted, Stone said he had “never denied perfectly legal back channel to Assange who indeed had the goods on #CrookedHillary”.

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2017/mar/05/roger-stone-trump-adviser-julian-assange

 

We've discussed this already in your status update - that Stone communicated through a third person.  Create a thread for it if you want to pursue this.

Edited by betsy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, betsy said:

 

Then it's you - you're the one who's spreading fake news!  He never said he "colluded."  Here's the deleted tweet.

 

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2017/mar/05/roger-stone-trump-adviser-julian-assange

 

We've discussed this already in your status update - that Stone communicated through a third person.  Create a thread for it if you want to pursue this.

That's still collusion and that's why he deleted the tweet. No new thread necessary because it's open and shut. What difference does communicating through a third party make? That just makes it a conspiracy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, BubberMiley said:

 What difference does communicating through a third party make? That just makes it a conspiracy.

:rolleyes:

Depends on what they're talking about.

If your friend tells you that he's helping his boss meet with his mistress....does that makes you a co-conspirator?  :lol: 

 

You're hanging out in weird places, Bubber.  Now you've got your update saying they want to hang Merryl Streep.  Told ya.  Those Oscars statuettes are just batshit worthless.    smiley.gif

Edited by betsy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,752
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    Dorai
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

    • paradox34 went up a rank
      Explorer
    • Venandi earned a badge
      Very Popular
    • CrazyCanuck89 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • CDN1 went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • DUI_Offender went up a rank
      Proficient
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...