Exegesisme Posted January 12, 2016 Report Share Posted January 12, 2016 (edited) 21 *Higher Leadership Top 10 In 21st Century, Political Philosophy for Human Future by exegesisme **1xπ US, 96 Nobel Laureates from 2001 to 2015, in total 357 Nobel Laureates. 2xπ UK, 20 Nobel Laureates from 2001 to 2015, in total 118 Nobel Laureates. 3xπ Japan, 15 Nobel Laureates from 2001 to 2015, in total 24 Nobel Laureates. 4xπ France, 9 Nobel Laureates from 2001 to 2015, in total 67 Nobel Laureates. 5xπ Germany, 8 Nobel Laureates from 2001 to 2015, in total 102 Nobel Laureates. 6xπ Israel, 8 Nobel Laureates from 2001 to 2015, in total 12 Nobel Laureates. 7xπ Russia, 5 Nobel Laureates from 2001 to 2015, in total 27 Nobel Laureates. ***8xπ Canada, 5 Nobel Laureates from 2001 to 2015, in total 24 Nobel Laureates. 9xπ Australia, 4 Nobel Laureates from 2001 to 2015, in total 13 Nobel Laureates. ****10xπ India and Norway, both 3 Nobel Laureates from 2001 to 2015, in total 13 Nobel Laureates. Note: * This is the first time globally try to measure higher leadership with objective information and top-ranking since I casted this concept higher leadership mouths ago in a post in the forum. * *US absolutely takes the power of higher leadership in about first one-seventh of 21st century. ***Canada has potential to improve her higher leadership in 21st century, Canadian government and people should do more. ****China has 4 Nobel Laureates from 2001 to 2015, in total 9 Nobel Laureates, would be at Top 10th if only by number. However, CCP accroachs the power of China, and does not admit one of them, which makes China fall out of Top 10. Reference https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Nobel_laureates_by_country# Edited January 12, 2016 by Exegesisme Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moonlight Graham Posted January 16, 2016 Report Share Posted January 16, 2016 Don't you have to measure it on a per capita basis? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Exegesisme Posted January 16, 2016 Author Report Share Posted January 16, 2016 Don't you have to measure it on a per capita basis? I think a per capita may be for common leadership, but improper for higher leadership. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moonlight Graham Posted January 16, 2016 Report Share Posted January 16, 2016 If country #1 has a population of 100 million and has 20 Nobel laureates, and country #2 has a population of 10 million and has 15 nobel laureates, which country has the best higher learning? I say country #2. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Exegesisme Posted January 16, 2016 Author Report Share Posted January 16, 2016 If country #1 has a population of 100 million and has 20 Nobel laureates, and country #2 has a population of 10 million and has 15 nobel laureates, which country has the best higher learning? I say country #2. I know what you mean know. The whole higher leadership may be still country 1, but country 2 may has a higher average human quality. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bush_cheney2004 Posted January 16, 2016 Report Share Posted January 16, 2016 Several Nobel laureates were born in and received their prizes for work completed in other nations, sometimes becoming dual citizens. Nations that provide the education resources and research investment will garner more Nobel prizes. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Exegesisme Posted January 16, 2016 Author Report Share Posted January 16, 2016 (edited) Your consideration is real, in detail may need caculate your consideration. And just now I found another rate, the rate of human dying of dignity, may also be a useful measurement for higher leadership. Nations that provide the education resources and research investment will garner more Nobel prizes. This is a common idea. But the truth is, all investment may be wasted if without a good culture and a good system. Some stupid politicians too believe their power and their money. Edited January 16, 2016 by Exegesisme Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Exegesisme Posted January 17, 2016 Author Report Share Posted January 17, 2016 (edited) This ranking has few important discoveries at least for me, 1 Our era the core of west civilization is English civilization, and also the core of all human civilization, certainly itself still should be humble. 2 Canadian is a people no strong desire to make progress, and even is bypassed by Israel. Canadian politicians are a group funs of power, and do not know what is great leadership, what is higher leadership. 3 Japan made a very important progress in higher leadership. 4 France is a little ahead of Germany, and both are far behind of US and UK. 5 Russia still is powerful. 6 This ranking in its improved vision with the rate of dying with dignity can reflect the higher leadership of a nation, and also the advanced level of a civilization. 7 The rate of dying with dignity is a final index to measure the self-conscious level of human civilization. Edited January 17, 2016 by Exegesisme Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Exegesisme Posted January 17, 2016 Author Report Share Posted January 17, 2016 (edited) One more index for higher leadership, the degree and quality of philosophical popularization. Edited January 17, 2016 by Exegesisme Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.