Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 84
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

More insults. And I notice then when directed at others though you give me more than my share. Is the temperature getting to you even in this cool summer (caused by global warming of course)?

no insults intended; none provided. Interpreting a statement as unenlighted is hardly an insult no matter how hard you try to fabricate drama.

Posted (edited)

No one will think that. Absolutely no one thinks about that.

I disagree. Smallc, I would argue that you don't understand Canadian federal politics.

How Canadian federal politicians play (perceptions) in one part of the country have an effect on their vote tallies in other parts of the country: particularly in Ontario (and Quebec).

=======

All Canadians, whatever language, know only two groups of Canadians: federal politicians and hockey players. What other Canadians think of these two groups matters.

Edited by August1991
Posted

I disagree. Smallc, I would argue that you don't understand Canadian federal politics.

How Canadian federal politicians play (perceptions) in one part of the country have an effect on their vote tallies in other parts of the country: particularly in Ontario (and Quebec).

=======

All Canadians, whatever language, know only two groups of Canadians: federal politicians and hockey players. What other Canadians think of these two groups matters.

Now there's a fairly simplistic view.

Posted

You're wrong. I'm sorry you can't admit it.

but, but... you didn't mansplain it! Should I fire up WebMD and start to list the side-effects, constraints, limitations of an IUD? The IUD is not a good, uhhh.... fit, ya fit..... for every woman! As an aside, didja know... certain religions have official policy against the use of contraception? But what the hey, you must know the personal details, life intimacies and religious conviction of the lady... I mean given your absolute definitiveness! We've also lost sight of the/your greater point! Apparently, women&babies aren't a suitable mix for your preferred type of MP... oh my!

Posted

but, but... you didn't mansplain it! Should I fire up WebMD and start to list the side-effects, constraints, limitations of an IUD? The IUD is not a good, uhhh.... fit, ya fit..... for every woman! As an aside, didja know... certain religions have official policy against the use of contraception? But what the hey, you must know the personal details, life intimacies and religious conviction of the lady... I mean given your absolute definitiveness! We've also lost sight of the/your greater point! Apparently, women&babies aren't a suitable mix for your preferred type of MP... oh my!

When cornered.....

Toronto, like a roach motel in the middle of a pretty living room.

Posted

Cornered nuthing. Waldo's absolutely right. Women can be pregnant and be MP's too. Shocking and immoral? I think not.

Sorry not in this case. She just scammed the government. And the fact she quit, tells us a lot or she just hates jews, which is it?

Toronto, like a roach motel in the middle of a pretty living room.

Posted

Sorry not in this case. She just scammed the government. And the fact she quit, tells us a lot or she just hates jews, which is it?

she's sitting as an independent. Try to raise your personal low-bar, hey! How juvenile to claim "she hates jews"! Just how old are you PIK?

Posted

she's sitting as an independent. Try to raise your personal low-bar, hey! How juvenile to claim "she hates jews"! Just how old are you PIK?

What was her reason for quitting ? And is she running again??

Toronto, like a roach motel in the middle of a pretty living room.

Posted

What was her reason for quitting ? And is she running again??

you're in the thread! Are you saying you don't actually know the reason why she chose to leave the NDP caucus? Oh my... well done PIK!

Posted

She said mulcair was supporting Israel to much.

Toronto, like a roach motel in the middle of a pretty living room.

Posted

She said mulcair was supporting Israel to much.

you have such a way with words! I read it as a combination of her questioning Mulcair's leadership approach/style and that his/the NDP's current policy on the Israeli-Palestine conflict is too one-sided... that it no longer aligns with the more balanced Layton position she agreed with/preferred. Whether accurate or not, that's what she says.

hey PIK, your favoured Conservative Party has also lost caucus members to the independent ranks in the past... some on their own volition. It happens. I believe Alberta MP Rathgeber is the latest - apparently, he had/has real concerns with your boy Harper. Go figure; again, it happens.

Posted

And she is from Tunisia, so maybe her upbringing is why she is upset at the support Israel gets from mulcair.

Toronto, like a roach motel in the middle of a pretty living room.

Posted

Cornered nuthing. Waldo's absolutely right. Women can be pregnant and be MP's too. Shocking and immoral? I think not.

Of course they can. That would be a strawman because waldo doesn't want to admit that her taking so much time off after being elected to represent her constituents was terribly irresponsible.

Posted

Or waldo works for the government and expects entitlements like that.

Toronto, like a roach motel in the middle of a pretty living room.

Posted

but, but... you didn't mansplain it! Should I fire up WebMD and start to list the side-effects, constraints, limitations of an IUD? The IUD is not a good, uhhh.... fit, ya fit..... for every woman! As an aside, didja know... certain religions have official policy against the use of contraception? But what the hey, you must know the personal details, life intimacies and religious conviction of the lady... I mean given your absolute definitiveness! We've also lost sight of the/your greater point! Apparently, women&babies aren't a suitable mix for your preferred type of MP... oh my!

I have very little respect for women being controlled by religious beliefs. Also, the likelihood that this woman is the about 1 in 1000 who can't tolerate the IUD is...well...about 1 in 1000. If it doesn't work for her, there are plenty of other forms, including the withdrawal method that is over 95% effective on its own.

Posted

Of course they can. That would be a strawman because waldo doesn't want to admit that her taking so much time off after being elected to represent her constituents was terribly irresponsible.

It's simple really. If she's shown to be right in her belief that Mulcair is too one sided, it hurts the NDP, which helps the Liberals. Don't tell Waldo that Trudeau is even more one sided though.

Posted

Of course they can. That would be a strawman because waldo doesn't want to admit that her taking so much time off after being elected to represent her constituents was terribly irresponsible.

have you been right on anything through this discussion? How much time are you claiming she took off... and substantiate that claim.

Posted

It's simple really. If she's shown to be right in her belief that Mulcair is too one sided, it hurts the NDP, which helps the Liberals. Don't tell Waldo that Trudeau is even more one sided though.

lil'c, I'm not as calculating as you! Try again, hey.

Posted

I have very little respect for women being controlled by religious beliefs. Also, the likelihood that this woman is the about 1 in 1000 who can't tolerate the IUD is...well...about 1 in 1000. If it doesn't work for her, there are plenty of other forms, including the withdrawal method that is over 95% effective on its own.

yes! You are a mansplainer extraordinaire! Your own words: "IUDs work for almost everyone". Almost?

in any case, as I read, she was back to Parliament, lickity split, after having her babies... there's enough articles/pics showing exactly that. Yes, a big deal appears to have been made because she brought her baby to Parliament. You read about Muclair allowing her to use his office for breastfeeding purposes (given it's proximity to chambers). So, what's the real story here, hey mansplainers?

but again, the bigger picture appears lost here... the thing cybercoma calls a "strawman". If she didn't miss any/much time, what's the beef other than, apparently, concerns that one can't be both a MP and a mother (with babe) at the same time! Go figure, hey enlightened mansplainers!

Posted

Sorry not in this case. She just scammed the government. And the fact she quit, tells us a lot or she just hates jews, which is it?

Scammed how? takin time off to have a child? My goodness, there's something women don't do - take time off work to have children! How dare she?

A bayonet is a tool with a worker at both ends

Posted

have you been right on anything through this discussion? How much time are you claiming she took off... and substantiate that claim.

She was a lousy MP who couldn't be bothered doing her job. That much is clear.

Posted

yes! You are a mansplainer extraordinaire! Your own words: "IUDs work for almost everyone". Almost?

Chances are it would have worked for her, yes.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,929
    • Most Online
      1,878

    Newest Member
    BTDT
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...