Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Translation: You don't care about the facts. You just want to fabricate as many excuses as possible in order to absolve people of any responsibility for their own choices and put the blame on people who have nothing to do with the problems but don't have the correct skin color.

I notice some here use "translate" alot to connotate a separate meaning to what was written......as if that makes a persuasive aargument. .....kind of like adding "your ilk" to a statement adds intelligence to an otherwise dull prose.

  • Replies 3.3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

I notice some here use "translate" alot to connotate a separate meaning to what was written......as if that makes a persuasive aargument. .....kind of like adding "your ilk" to a statement adds intelligence to an otherwise dull prose.

Everything that follows "translation" is usually a strawman, worthy of being ignored, yes.

Posted

Translation: You don't care about the facts. You just want to fabricate as many excuses as possible in order to absolve people of any responsibility for their own choices and put the blame on people who have nothing to do with the problems but don't have the correct skin color.

You don't know what I want or care about, so don't speak for me. I said "forget the cite" because it's irrelevant for the reasons I listed, but you couldn't be bothered reading the rest of that post. So take your idiotic strawman arguments somewhere else.

Posted (edited)

That black people die at twice the rate that they should given the percentages.

In total, they actually die at four times the rate that they should - given the percentages......almost exclusively at the hands of other black people - 52% of all homicides/13% of the population. If you put so much faith in "percentages", don't you think those facts - and all that violence - might help to explain why there are more "escalated" confrontations with police?

Edited by Keepitsimple

Back to Basics

Posted

You don't know what I want or care about, so don't speak for me. I said "forget the cite" because it's irrelevant for the reasons I listed, but you couldn't be bothered reading the rest of that post. So take your idiotic strawman arguments somewhere else.

Fix it for them, what must american society do to wipe clean any generational problems that still exist due to slavery that you can't just expect the people themselves to overcome? Other cultures have been badly mistreated and don't seem to have this same problem, tell us why, and how do should it be fixed. If everyone else is wrong shouldn't you have the answers?

Posted

In total, they actually die at four times the rate that they should - given the percentages......almost exclusively at the hands of other black people - 52% of all homicides/13% of the population. If you put so much faith in "percentages", don't you think those facts - and all that violence - might help to explain why there are more "escalated" confrontations with police?

But...racism.

Posted

In total, they actually die at four times the rate that they should - given the percentages......almost exclusively at the hands of other black people - 52% of all homicides/13% of the population. If you put so much faith in "percentages", don't you think those facts - and all that violence - might help to explain why there are more "escalated" confrontations with police?

You know white people die exclusively at the hands of other white people too, right?

Posted

You know white people die exclusively at the hands of other white people too, right?

So do Asians at the hands of Asians, Hispanics at the hands of Hispanics, etc..........but at far, far less frequency than blacks. Blacks commit more murders every year than "whites" and every other category combined! But you knew that was my point, didn't you?

Back to Basics

Posted

Fix it for them, what must american society do to wipe clean any generational problems that still exist due to slavery that you can't just expect the people themselves to overcome?

If one believes that there are systemic barriers to the advancement of the black community in place and that racism is an inextricable part of American society due to the unique circumstances of its history, one would probably not have a laundry list of easy solutions. If one doesn't, it's easy to come up with easy solutions (stop having kids! get a job! pull up your pants). But that person is probably full of shit.

Other cultures have been badly mistreated and don't seem to have this same problem, tell us why, and how do should it be fixed. If everyone else is wrong shouldn't you have the answers?

What other cultures, specifically?

Posted

So do Asians at the hands of Asians, Hispanics at the hands of Hispanics, etc..........but at far, far less frequency than blacks. Blacks commit more murders every year than "whites" and every other category combined! But you knew that was my point, didn't you?

I'm not sure what your point is. Simply rattling off statistics isn't making a point, it's just...rattling off statistics.

Posted

Fix it for them, what must american society do to wipe clean any generational problems that still exist due to slavery that you can't just expect the people themselves to overcome? Other cultures have been badly mistreated and don't seem to have this same problem, tell us why, and how do should it be fixed. If everyone else is wrong shouldn't you have the answers?

Fix it for them? That's the problem. Too many generations of people like you thinking that we need to fix things for other people, as if we're benevolent benefactors doling out gifts.

Posted

I'm not sure what your point is. Simply rattling off statistics isn't making a point, it's just...rattling off statistics.

Those statistics are never part of the public discussion - and they should be - to give some perspective to the problem of police indiscriminately shooting black people. That's my point.....and you know that.

Back to Basics

Posted

You know white people die exclusively at the hands of other white people too, right?

Not so much...

"A liberal is someone who claims to be open to all points of view — and then is surprised and offended to find there are other points of view.” William F Buckley

Posted

Fix it for them? That's the problem. Too many generations of people like you thinking that we need to fix things for other people, as if we're benevolent benefactors doling out gifts.

Oh, cool. So we don't have to do anything, then? Excellent!

"A liberal is someone who claims to be open to all points of view — and then is surprised and offended to find there are other points of view.” William F Buckley

Posted

Not so much...

83 per cent of white murder victims are murdered by whites. So yeah, pretty much. Oh and whites are six times as likely to be murdered by another white person as by a black person.

Posted

Those statistics are never part of the public discussion - and they should be - to give some perspective to the problem of police indiscriminately shooting black people. That's my point.....and you know that.

So you want to minimize and dismiss police shootings because some black people shoot other black people?

Posted

Those are your words - not mine.

Then maybe you should make a point. Fact is, a cursory look at the last few months of debate show that, contrary to your suggestion that these crime stats are never talked about, it's virtually impossible to have a conversation about police violence without someone bringing up so-called black-on-black crime. So no, you aren't really bringing any sort of fresh perspective on the issue.

Posted (edited)

83 per cent of white murder victims are murdered by whites. So yeah, pretty much. Oh and whites are six times as likely to be murdered by another white person as by a black person.

83 percent is not 100 percent, and if you read the cite it eluded to but did not mention the fact that Hispanics, who commit a hugely disproportionate amount of crime, just as Blacks do have, up until now, been included under 'Caucasian' in the FBI statistics. That is now changing. And just as the cite I posted suggests, we'll discover the great majority of ALL murders are committed by Blacks and Hispanics.

Edited by Argus

"A liberal is someone who claims to be open to all points of view — and then is surprised and offended to find there are other points of view.” William F Buckley

Posted

83 percent is not 100 percent,

No. But it's close enough to make the point: the overwhelming majority of all murders (and indeed, most crimes) are committed by people who are the same race as the victim.

and if you read the cite it eluded to but did not mention the fact that Hispanics, who commit a hugely disproportionate amount of crime, just as Blacks do have, up until now, been included under 'Caucasian' in the FBI statistics. That is now changing. And just as the cite I posted suggests, we'll discover the great majority of ALL murders are committed by Blacks and Hispanics.

Blacks and Hispanics are disproportionately represented as both victims and offenders. Most murders would be of blacks and Hispanics by other blacks and Hispanics. The rest would be largely whites killing whites.

Posted

Cite ?

Does that really need a cite? People from all countries, including black people, have continued to immigrate to the US throughout the 20th and 21st centuries in significant numbers.
And even that leaves out the amount of impregnation of female slaves by male slaveowners. Thomas Jefferson was not the only one to have some afternoon delight, by force, with their slaves.
  • Free speech: "You can say what you want, but I don't have to lend you my megaphone."
  • Always remember that when you are in the right you can afford to keep your temper, and when you are in the wrong you cannot afford to lose it. - J.J. Reynolds.
  • Will the steps anyone is proposing to fight "climate change" reduce a single temperature, by a single degree, at a single location?
  • The mantra of "world opinion" or the views of the "international community" betrays flabby and weak reasoning (link).

Posted

These "demonstrations," especially ones that inconvenience the public, are counterproductive. Does anyone seriously think that creating monstrous traffic jams will really convince a lot of people to support reform of abusive policing. Are uninvolved people stuck in traffic jams really likely to agree with the cause?

Quote

jbg, on 17 Dec 1773 said:

These "demonstrations," especially ones that damage private property, are counterproductive. Does anyone seriously think that throwing a bunch of tea into the harbor will really convince a lot of people to support reform of continental tax policy. Are uninvolved people who don't get their tea really likely to agree with the cause?

Quote

jbg, on 8 March 1965 said:

These "demonstrations," especially ones that inconvenience the public, are counterproductive. Does anyone seriously think that creating monstrous traffic jams will really convince a lot of people to support civil rights. Are uninvolved people stuck in traffic jams between Selma and Montgomery really likely to agree with the cause?

I must confess that I didn't notice the 1773 and 1965 provenance of my posts. Very original even if I don't agree.

And the reason I don't agree is that the 1773 and 1965 situations involved people going about their business and authorities responding in a violent manner. In 1773 the tea partiers were vindicating their rights as Englishmen. Even in Selma there was no blockage of vital services. There is also no evidence of massive commuting between Selma and Montgomery. The NYC demonstrators were tying up vital connections such as the Brooklyn Bridge and the Lincoln Tunnel.

But still creative.

  • Free speech: "You can say what you want, but I don't have to lend you my megaphone."
  • Always remember that when you are in the right you can afford to keep your temper, and when you are in the wrong you cannot afford to lose it. - J.J. Reynolds.
  • Will the steps anyone is proposing to fight "climate change" reduce a single temperature, by a single degree, at a single location?
  • The mantra of "world opinion" or the views of the "international community" betrays flabby and weak reasoning (link).

Posted

I must confess that I didn't notice the 1773 and 1965 provenance of my posts. Very original even if I don't agree.

And the reason I don't agree is that the 1773 and 1965 situations involved people going about their business and authorities responding in a violent manner. In 1773 the tea partiers were vindicating their rights as Englishmen. Even in Selma there was no blockage of vital services. There is also no evidence of massive commuting between Selma and Montgomery. The NYC demonstrators were tying up vital connections such as the Brooklyn Bridge and the Lincoln Tunnel.

But still creative.

The broader point, which you seem to keep missing, is that change seldom comes through non-disruptive means. You'd think someone from a country founded in a violent rebellion would grasp that.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...