Accountability Now Posted October 13, 2014 Report Posted October 13, 2014 Yes, I produce CO2 when I breath. Thank you. Finally someone with honesty and the intellecual capacity to acknowledge this scientific fact. Are you implying that when I eat an apple and breathe I am increasing the amount of CO2 in the same way as burning a lump of coal would? Yes or no? I am not implying that at all. In fact I have outright stated that the amount of CO2 produced from breathing is insignificant to what we produce from burning fossil fuels. Here are two times in this thread that I said it. Great link. Sums up everything I have said. Humans DO produce CO2 but the amount they create pales in conparison to production from burning fossil fuels. Glad to see you now agree that humans do produce it. Maybe there is hope for On Guard too? I know waldo is a lost cause but here's hoping! Don't bother. He doesn't get it. He doesn't understand the difference between a chemical reaction and changing states. I have tried to explain this to him and he's not having any. CO2 is produced by humans. If we have 2 billion people on this earth versus 7 billion that means that we would have less CO2 production. Obviously that production pales in comparison to the CO2 being produced by burning fossil fuels but its still produced nonehtheless. How can we have honest, intellecutual conversations about something so complex as global warming when people aren't being honest or have the intellectual capacity to understand something so basic as cellular respiration? Quote
waldo Posted October 13, 2014 Author Report Posted October 13, 2014 Thank you. Finally someone with honesty and the intellecual capacity to acknowledge this scientific fact. it's always a pleasure to showcase your personal level of insult and just how juvenile you can be! You can ply your bullshit strawman forever... no one said otherwise! I am not implying that at all. In fact I have outright stated that the amount of CO2 produced from breathing is insignificant to what we produce from burning fossil fuels. Here are two times in this thread that I said it. How can we have honest, intellecutual conversations about something so complex as global warming when people aren't being honest or have the intellectual capacity to understand something so basic as cellular respiration? so again, what was your point? Why did you derail this thread to the level you did... what was... what is... your point here? Quote
Accountability Now Posted October 13, 2014 Report Posted October 13, 2014 it's always a pleasure to showcase your personal level of insult and just how juvenile you can be! You can ply your bullshit strawman forever... no one said otherwise! so again, what was your point? Why did you derail this thread to the level you did... what was... what is... your point here? Just stated my point. Please, for the love of science, try your best to slowly read and comprehend. Your whole outrage started when you failed to read/comprehend my initial statement. I see that you continue to do so. Either you truly can't read or your dishonest ways continue. I am quite certain its the latter. Quote
waldo Posted October 13, 2014 Author Report Posted October 13, 2014 Just stated my point. Please, for the love of science, try your best to slowly read and comprehend. Your whole outrage started when you failed to read/comprehend my initial statement. I see that you continue to do so. Either you truly can't read or your dishonest ways continue. I am quite certain its the latter. no outrage here; none at all... other than your strawman attempts, all's good; again, anytime your juvenile/insult act can be showcased, it's all good! I certainly don't read "your point" in your latest prior post. Again, what was your point? Quote
Accountability Now Posted October 13, 2014 Report Posted October 13, 2014 no outrage here; none at all... other than your strawman attempts, all's good; again, anytime your juvenile/insult act can be showcased, it's all good! I certainly don't read "your point" in your latest prior post. Again, what was your point? Oh its there. I can't hold your hand through this bud. Quote
waldo Posted October 13, 2014 Author Report Posted October 13, 2014 Oh its there. I can't hold your hand through this bud. all I read is you repeating "pales in comparison". So what? You went a long, long way to repeat the same points that others already acknowledged you making previously... ya, ya, it "pales in comparison". That... that was your point? Regardless of its "paling in comparison"... what other point were you trying to make??? Quote
waldo Posted October 13, 2014 Author Report Posted October 13, 2014 MLW member, 'eyeball', asked you if you were implying something... you said you were not implying what he asked you; however, you somehow failed to actually state what you were implying. Imagine that! Go figure. again, what WERE you implying... what was your point? Quote
Accountability Now Posted October 13, 2014 Report Posted October 13, 2014 MLW member, 'eyeball', asked you if you were implying something... you said you were not implying what he asked you; however, you somehow failed to actually state what you were implying. Imagine that! Go figure. again, what WERE you implying... what was your point? Wow...you really do fail to comprehend. This is amazing. My quoted post (one that is visible for all to read and comprehend if they have such capabilities) states that I was NOT implying anything and furthermore I had outright stated that CO2 from breathing was insignificant. You know...the same point I made that made your faux outrage explode across the screen in your first response. In order to avoid wasting any time (simply because you are not worth it....I will repost the point I made. I will hold your hand on this once again waldo so that you can finally get your head wrapped around it. How can we have honest, intellecutual conversations about something so complex as global warming when people aren't being honest or have the intellectual capacity to understand something so basic as cellular respiration? I'm sure you know which one of these categories is directed at you...Mr. Dishonesty! Let your response filled with your standard nothingness and random waldoism favorites (you know....clearly, bluster, bumbling, Harper/Harper Conservatives, emoticon, emoticon, emoticon) Quote
waldo Posted October 13, 2014 Author Report Posted October 13, 2014 In order to avoid wasting any time (simply because you are not worth it....I will repost the point I made. I will hold your hand on this once again waldo so that you can finally get your head wrapped around it. How can we have honest, intellecutual conversations about something so complex as global warming when people aren't being honest or have the intellectual capacity to understand something so basic as cellular respiration? what does your thread derail on human breathing produced CO2 have to do with, as you say, "intellectual conversations about something so complex as global warming"? . Quote
waldo Posted October 13, 2014 Author Report Posted October 13, 2014 CO2 is CO2. There is no distinction between CO2 exhaled by humans and CO2 produced by burning coal, once its in the air its just a CO2 molecule, identical to every other. no - there is a distinction! As a part of a 'closed system', natural sourced CO2 does not result in a net addition of CO2 to the atmosphere... again, it is not factored into atmospheric emission inventories. Quote
jbg Posted October 13, 2014 Report Posted October 13, 2014 Your explanation to the picture is talking about humans peeing. Not even close to breathing!You left out the ability of mammals, including man, to emit sulfur. Quote Free speech: "You can say what you want, but I don't have to lend you my megaphone." Always remember that when you are in the right you can afford to keep your temper, and when you are in the wrong you cannot afford to lose it. - J.J. Reynolds. Will the steps anyone is proposing to fight "climate change" reduce a single temperature, by a single degree, at a single location? The mantra of "world opinion" or the views of the "international community" betrays flabby and weak reasoning (link).
Accountability Now Posted October 13, 2014 Report Posted October 13, 2014 what does your thread derail on human breathing produced CO2 have to do with, as you say, "intellectual conversations about something so complex as global warming"? . Love the emoticon. So waldo. If people don't know something as simple as human produced CO2 then what purpose do they serve in talking about global warming? Furthermore, if people like yourself are just going to deflect and be dishonest with the hopes of not letting their side down then what's the point? Who does that help? You could have easily ended this by letting your warmies in on the well known secret that humans do produce CO2 however it would have KILLED you to actually side with a 'denier' even though this is basic fact. This speaks volumes about the distance you would go just to protect your warmie mindset versus having honest, intellecutual conversation. Your thread is about the denier mindset. Your little charade here was concrete proof of the warmie mindset and its defensive and closed minded tactics. Quote
Accountability Now Posted October 13, 2014 Report Posted October 13, 2014 You left out the ability of mammals, including man, to emit sulfur. I didn't want to pick it apart too much. On Guard is still struggling with the basics of it. Also, waldo spent a lot of time drawing it so I didn't want to hurt his feelings. Quote
waldo Posted October 13, 2014 Author Report Posted October 13, 2014 Your thread is about the denier mindset. Your little charade here was concrete proof of the warmie mindset and its defensive and closed minded tactics. yes! Perfect... I just knew I could get it out of you! The sole reason for your purposeful thread derail was you presumed to think you could do a "turn-around" on the mindset! And yet, all you did was add... and add significantly a showcased example of your personal fake-skeptic/denier mindset! you went "to the mattresses" to attempt to ply your so transparent strawman. Again, because another MLW member called your stoopid ploy "phony", that wasn't a confirmation of your strawman... it was simply speaking to your phony attempt to make something out of nothing. Again, because another MLW member spoke correctly of human breathing in the context of the carbon cycle, that wasn't a confirmation of your strawman... it was simply showcasing you clearly didn't understand the carbon cycle. After all your blustering, your insults, your labeling others as being dishonest, at the end of all this, you have no point to make... other than your strawman attempt went no where! Well done... again, yours is a fine addition to this fake-skeptic/denier mindset thread! Quote
Accountability Now Posted October 13, 2014 Report Posted October 13, 2014 yes! Perfect... I just knew I could get it out of you! The sole reason for your purposeful thread derail was you presumed to think you could do a "turn-around" on the mindset! And yet, all you did was add... and add significantly a showcased example of your personal fake-skeptic/denier mindset! you went "to the mattresses" to attempt to ply your so transparent strawman. Again, because another MLW member called your stoopid ploy "phony", that wasn't a confirmation of your strawman... it was simply speaking to your phony attempt to make something out of nothing. Again, because another MLW member spoke correctly of human breathing in the context of the carbon cycle, that wasn't a confirmation of your strawman... it was simply showcasing you clearly didn't understand the carbon cycle. After all your blustering, your insults, your labeling others as being dishonest, at the end of all this, you have no point to make... other than your strawman attempt went no where! Well done... again, yours is a fine addition to this fake-skeptic/denier mindset thread! Get it out of me? I had to post it three times and pretty much spell it out for you. Yet you still come up with this "I knew it all along" BS. You are priceless waldo. The most dishonest person on this forum BY FAR. Have fun conversing with yourself. I trust you are used to it by now. Quote
waldo Posted October 13, 2014 Author Report Posted October 13, 2014 (edited) Get it out of me? I had to post it three times and pretty much spell it out for you. Yet you still come up with this "I knew it all along" BS. You are priceless waldo. The most dishonest person on this forum BY FAR. Have fun conversing with yourself. I trust you are used to it by now. you struggle so! The "getting it out of you" was you finally admitting why you derailed the thread, in your failed presumptive attempt to shift the mindset focus. Your implied self-honesty is the biggest sham you run around here... you're the king of (failed) strawman attempts. This was one of your more elaborate strawman failures. No one disagreed... which meant you had to twist your pretzel strawman ever more, you had to bluster louder, you had to insult more. At the end of all this it was simply gravy to read you presume to speak of "intellectual honesty" in discussing global warming... when your whole failed strawman attempt blew up on you and had nothing... nothing... to do with global warming! . Edited October 13, 2014 by waldo Quote
Accountability Now Posted October 13, 2014 Report Posted October 13, 2014 you struggle so! The "getting it out of you" was you finally admitting why you derailed the thread, in your failed presumptive attempt to shift the mindset focus. Your implied self-honesty is the biggest sham you run around here... you're the king of (failed) strawman attempts. This was one of your more elaborate strawman failures. No one disagreed... which meant you had to twist your pretzel strawman ever more, you had to bluster louder, you had to insult more. At the end of all this it was simply gravy to read you presume to speak of "intellectual honesty" in discussing global warming... when your whole failed strawman attempt blew up on you and had nothing... nothing... to do with global warming! . You are so freaking deluded that it's not even funny anymore. Perhaps your dishonesty comes naturally as the fantasy world you live in tells you it's ok! Quote
waldo Posted October 13, 2014 Author Report Posted October 13, 2014 You are so freaking deluded that it's not even funny anymore. Perhaps your dishonesty comes naturally as the fantasy world you live in tells you it's ok! c'mon buddy... show us your "intellectual honesty" and talk about human breathing and global warming!!! Quote
Accountability Now Posted October 13, 2014 Report Posted October 13, 2014 c'mon buddy... show us your "intellectual honesty" and talk about human breathing and global warming!!! Shhh waldingo. The adults are talking. Go back to your drawings. When you get passed the grade 5 topic of cellular respiration then....maybe then we can introduce you to junior high science Quote
waldo Posted October 13, 2014 Author Report Posted October 13, 2014 Shhh waldingo. The adults are talking. Go back to your drawings. When you get passed the grade 5 topic of cellular respiration then....maybe then we can introduce you to junior high science per your norm, more insults! As a claimed "adult talking", why won't you talk when you're repeatedly asked/challenged to the following: Again, given your absolute fixation on human breathing produced CO2, does human breathing contribute to CO2 buildup in the atmosphere? Quote
jbg Posted October 13, 2014 Report Posted October 13, 2014 This thread is getting very boring. Quote Free speech: "You can say what you want, but I don't have to lend you my megaphone." Always remember that when you are in the right you can afford to keep your temper, and when you are in the wrong you cannot afford to lose it. - J.J. Reynolds. Will the steps anyone is proposing to fight "climate change" reduce a single temperature, by a single degree, at a single location? The mantra of "world opinion" or the views of the "international community" betrays flabby and weak reasoning (link).
waldo Posted October 13, 2014 Author Report Posted October 13, 2014 This thread is getting very boring. you're adding immensely to it! Quote
Accountability Now Posted October 13, 2014 Report Posted October 13, 2014 per your norm, more insults! As a claimed "adult talking", why won't you talk when you're repeatedly asked/challenged to the following: Again, given your absolute fixation on human breathing produced CO2, does human breathing contribute to CO2 buildup in the atmosphere? You show childish tendencies. Perhaps it's your poor reading and comprehension skills. Perhaps it's the tempers you throw when someone doesn't agree with you. Perhaps it's your close minded attitude. I've also noted kids tend to lie when backed into a corner. Resemble anyone? You've proven to act like a child on many levels....hence the point about letting the adults talk. PS...I've already stated human breathing is insignificant a number of times. Come on...even a fifth grader would have caught that by now!!! Quote
waldo Posted October 13, 2014 Author Report Posted October 13, 2014 I've already stated human breathing is insignificant a number of times. Come on...even a fifth grader would have caught that by now!!! insignificant to what? Your insignificant reference is ignorant and simply showcases you continue to draw a relationship between human breathing produced CO2 and anthropogenic fossil-fuel burning sourced CO2. The "significace level" you keep nattering on about makes absolutely no difference... there is no relationship to be drawn between them in the first place. again, simply answer the question you refuse to even acnowledge... the question you keep running from, you keep avoiding, you keep deflecting away from. Again, given your absolute fixation on human breathing produced CO2, does human breathing contribute to CO2 buildup in the atmosphere? c'mon, show us your claimed "intellectual honesty"... answer the question... don't run away from it! Quote
Accountability Now Posted October 13, 2014 Report Posted October 13, 2014 insignificant to what? Your insignificant reference is ignorant and simply showcases you continue to draw a relationship between human breathing produced CO2 and anthropogenic fossil-fuel burning sourced CO2. The "significace level" you keep nattering on about makes absolutely no difference... there is no relationship to be drawn between them in the first place. I see where you are struggling. You don't know the definition of insignificant. Here: in·sig·nif·i·cant ˌinsiɡˈnifəkənt/ adjective adjective: insignificant too small or unimportant to be worth consideration Seeing as how I have already stated the breathing is insignificant then by definition it clearly means its not worth consideration. But yet you childishly go off on a tangent stating that I am drawing some relationship when I have repeatedly stated it is INSIGNIFICANT!!!! What other words do you need defined? I believe they teach kids how to use a dictionary in grade 2 or 3. Quote
.thumb.jpg.9a49e1b2f22a6d34a345152c50044aa9.jpg)
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.