On Guard for Thee Posted October 18, 2014 Report Posted October 18, 2014 waldingoman???? That is priceless. Have you done any reading on the closed carbon system yet? Quote
Accountability Now Posted October 18, 2014 Report Posted October 18, 2014 (edited) Have you done any reading on the closed carbon system yet? Why are you even talking? You made a fool of yourself already! Your honest warmie brethren outright admitted humans produce co2. Even waldo begrudgingly admitted this. You're all alone out there pal!! Lol!! Edited October 18, 2014 by Accountability Now Quote
waldo Posted October 18, 2014 Author Report Posted October 18, 2014 Why are you even talking? You made a fool of yourself already! Your honest warmie brethren outright admitted humans produce co2. Even waldo begrudgingly admitted this. You're all alone out there pal!! Lol!! why are you daring to show your self in this thread again? Haven't you been embarassed enough yet? Still plying your strawman, hey! Why make shyte up?... why not just keep quiet, take your lumps... and read up on the carbon cycle!!! Again, no one here disagreed with your unrelated and insignificant point... one that has no bearing on AGW/CC related discussions, one that you simply chose to use to derail this thread. Again, no matter how hard you try to claim otherwise, another MLW member calling your nonsense "phony" does not support your strawman; equally, another MLW member totally confusing you with the carbon cycle also does not support your strawman. And, of course, my numerous references to human breathing output does not support your strawman; in my case, it just shows you haven't the wherewithal to draw inferences! Quote
Accountability Now Posted October 18, 2014 Report Posted October 18, 2014 (edited) why are you daring to show your self in this thread again? Haven't you been embarassed enough yet? Still plying your strawman, hey! Why make shyte up?... why not just keep quiet, take your lumps... and read up on the carbon cycle!!! Again, no one here disagreed with your unrelated and insignificant point... one that has no bearing on AGW/CC related discussions, one that you simply chose to use to derail this thread. Again, no matter how hard you try to claim otherwise, another MLW member calling your nonsense "phony" does not support your strawman; equally, another MLW member totally confusing you with the carbon cycle also does not support your strawman. And, of course, my numerous references to human breathing output does not support your strawman; in my case, it just shows you haven't the wherewithal to draw inferences!How utterly obtuse can you be? Seriously? For the umpteenth time, the phony comment wasn't even directed at me. Lmfao. You seriously struggle with reading and simple comprehension. How dare you to show your name on this forum never mind the thread. Your trolling is obviously catching up on you as you now have to create a new handle as the moderators are figuring your antics out. Good on them Edited October 18, 2014 by Accountability Now Quote
waldo Posted October 18, 2014 Author Report Posted October 18, 2014 How utterly obtuse can you be? Seriously? For the umpteenth time, the phony comment wasn't even directed at me. Lmfao. You seriously struggle with reading and simple comprehension. the other MLW member's "phony" comment was directed at your phony nonsense... your unrelated and insignificant focus on human breathing that has no bearing on any discussions concerning AGW/CC - just your derail du jour! Not only was your denier status firmly entrenched within this thread, it's gravy to realize that through all your bluster-bus, you had no idea where human breathing output, as a natural source, aligns within the carbon cycle. You kept nattering away about it and thought to give yourself cover by calling the amount insignificant! That's right baby, insignificant to the point there's no avenue to compare it to non-natural fossil-fuel sourced CO2... there's no relationship to allow you to presume to draw significance! That sir, was probably your biggest fail through your "phony" nonsense! but c'mon, like I said, what's your next act/derail attempt? Quote
Accountability Now Posted October 18, 2014 Report Posted October 18, 2014 the other MLW member's "phony" comment was directed at your phony nonsense... your unrelated and insignificant focus on human breathing that has no bearing on any discussions concerning AGW/CC - just your derail du jour! Not even close waldingoman!!! I wasn't even involved in the conversation at that point. What other lies do you tell yourself to make you feel better and sleep at night? Quote
waldo Posted October 18, 2014 Author Report Posted October 18, 2014 Not even close waldingoman!!! I wasn't even involved in the conversation at that point. What other lies do you tell yourself to make you feel better and sleep at night? back to your normal insult mode, hey! Yes, given your carbon cycle fail, the labeling of "human breathing produced CO2" as phony is most accurate and apropos. Tell me again, how insignificant is it? Rather than replay your fail/embarassment, as I said, what's your next denier act for this fake-skeptic/denier mindset thread? There is so much out there... and you have so much to give! Please proceed, Governor. Quote
Accountability Now Posted October 18, 2014 Report Posted October 18, 2014 back to your normal insult mode, hey! Yes, given your carbon cycle fail, the labeling of "human breathing produced CO2" as phony is most accurate and apropos. Tell me again, how insignificant is it? Rather than replay your fail/embarassment, as I said, what's your next denier act for this fake-skeptic/denier mindset thread? There is so much out there... and you have so much to give! Please proceed, Governor. The only insult involved here is your antics and outright lies. Carry on waldingoman! Carry on!! Quote
waldo Posted October 18, 2014 Author Report Posted October 18, 2014 he says as he lays down another insult. No lies here buddy... please come back with something new... you're getting even more boring than usual, hey! Quote
Accountability Now Posted October 18, 2014 Report Posted October 18, 2014 he says as he lays down another insult. No lies here buddy... please come back with something new... you're getting even more boring than usual, hey! If you find your dishonesty to be an insult then I would suggest you stop being dishonest. Or create a new handle....oops already done! Quote
waldo Posted October 18, 2014 Author Report Posted October 18, 2014 If you find your dishonesty to be an insult then I would suggest you stop being dishonest. Or create a new handle....oops already done! write it loud and clear... you're making definitive statements about a new members chosen name. Say it again, don't dance around it, be very precise and very absolute in what you're stating/claiming. Show your kind of self-proclaimed honesty. waiting Quote
Accountability Now Posted October 18, 2014 Report Posted October 18, 2014 write it loud and clear... you're making definitive statements about a new members chosen name. Say it again, don't dance around it, be very precise and very absolute in what you're stating/claiming. Show your kind of self-proclaimed honesty. waiting I already have. I'm stating that you created a new handle and specifically used the name waldingoman. Nice work! Quote
On Guard for Thee Posted October 18, 2014 Report Posted October 18, 2014 Why are you even talking? You made a fool of yourself already! Your honest warmie brethren outright admitted humans produce co2. Even waldo begrudgingly admitted this. You're all alone out there pal!! Lol!! Apparently you haven't done your assigned reading yet. Naughty boy! Quote
waldo Posted October 18, 2014 Author Report Posted October 18, 2014 I already have. I'm stating that you created a new handle and specifically used the name waldingoman. Nice work! and the basis for your claim? Show your honesty here... put it on full display. Quote
Accountability Now Posted October 18, 2014 Report Posted October 18, 2014 Apparently you haven't done your assigned reading yet. Naughty boy! Hey....bring it up with your fellow warmies that outed you. Quote
Accountability Now Posted October 18, 2014 Report Posted October 18, 2014 (edited) and the basis for your claim? Show your honesty here... put it on full display. Let's see...I call you waldingo and now there is conviently a new handle called waldingoman? Hmmm...I wonder who that could be Edited October 18, 2014 by Accountability Now Quote
On Guard for Thee Posted October 18, 2014 Report Posted October 18, 2014 Hey....bring it up with your fellow warmies that outed you. They have already done their homework. Quote
Accountability Now Posted October 18, 2014 Report Posted October 18, 2014 They have already done their homework. Yes....and they have all disagree with you. Lol...what does that say about you???!!! Quote
On Guard for Thee Posted October 18, 2014 Report Posted October 18, 2014 Yes....and they have all disagree with you. Lol...what does that say about you???!!! What it does say about you is perhaps you don't comprehend well what you read. Keep trying. Quote
Accountability Now Posted October 18, 2014 Report Posted October 18, 2014 What it does say about you is perhaps you don't comprehend well what you read. Keep trying. Lmfao....so they all disagree with you...as do I....and I'm the one that doesn't read well? Quote
waldo Posted October 18, 2014 Author Report Posted October 18, 2014 Let's see...I call you waldingo and now there is conviently a new handle called waldingoman? Hmmm...I wonder who that could be good to read the measure and level of your self-described honesty. I suggest you report your grand revelation to this boards moderator... you do know discussion board's have tools available to check for multiple handles, right? Quote
Accountability Now Posted October 18, 2014 Report Posted October 18, 2014 good to read the measure and level of your self-described honesty. I suggest you report your grand revelation to this boards moderator... you do know discussion board's have tools available to check for multiple handles, right? I'm sure they're as on it as they are on your continued dishonesty Quote
waldo Posted October 18, 2014 Author Report Posted October 18, 2014 What it does say about you is perhaps you don't comprehend well what you read. Keep trying. suggest you ignore the guys BS... and let him slink away in all his declared "honesty". He blew up big time with his carbon cycle failure. He showed his ignorance in presuming to compare natural and non-natural CO2 sources. He's got nothing left but to continue to play out his strawman and falsely claim positions for others. Well... there's also his thread derail act... he's still got that! Quote
On Guard for Thee Posted October 18, 2014 Report Posted October 18, 2014 suggest you ignore the guys BS... and let him slink away in all his declared "honesty". He blew up big time with his carbon cycle failure. He showed his ignorance in presuming to compare natural and non-natural CO2 sources. He's got nothing left but to continue to play out his strawman and falsely claim positions for others. Well... there's also his thread derail act... he's still got that! Not a bad idea, lest we sink into a cycle so tight as to match even that of carbon. Quote
Accountability Now Posted October 18, 2014 Report Posted October 18, 2014 suggest you ignore the guys BS... and let him slink away in all his declared "honesty". He blew up big time with his carbon cycle failure. He showed his ignorance in presuming to compare natural and non-natural CO2 sources. He's got nothing left but to continue to play out his strawman and falsely claim positions for others. Well... there's also his thread derail act... he's still got that! Yes waldingo...keep up the lies. Not once did I tie human breathing to non natural sources other than to say it was insignificant (much like your contributions). Quick question....do humans produce CO2? Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.