Jump to content

The Conjuring


bleeding heart

Recommended Posts

James Wan of the overworked, overrated "Saw" franchise has been branching out to more PG-13 horror fare. The latest, and by far his best-received, is the "Amityville Horror/Exorcist" conflation called "The Conjuring."

I'm pretty ambivalent. I didn't hate it. Didn't like it. But it's hard to imagine a more...well, conventional horror film.

Oddly enough in this day and age, it's totally lacking in irony, totally lacking in any moral complications. No doubt is sown among the audience; no characters display moral or ethical complications or contradictions; and there is no subtextual social critique, which I believe the best horror films always play with.

It turns out that the ghost is not really a ghost at all, but a demon. That is, an unearthly presence that has never walked the earth as a human being. But all the haunted house/ghost story elements are present. And man, this demon is pure evil. Period. Not only that, but it is a Christian (in fact, Catholic) horror story, complete with crosses, the whole shtick.

Interestingly (or maybe not) the Ghost Hunters-cum-Exorcists are played straight. There's no question whatsoever that they are the genuine article, that demon possession is real, and that demons are pure and unadulterated evil.

Ostensibly "based on a true story," I feel pretty confidant that this "true story" is the viewpoint of the real-life "ghost hunters" who are two of the four main characters (the other two being the victimized couple...the children are basically props).

I'm still trying to consider how this is different--blander, more--ok, let's say it--conservative than a lot of horror films. The difference is clearly present, but I haven't got it clarified yet in my head.

Rating: meh.

Edited by bleeding heart
Link to comment
Share on other sites

"Conjuring" gave me the giggles as every tried and true element was trotted out on screen without boring CGI trickery. The acting was adequate, and the "true story" backbone complete with early 1970's setting was charming. I foung the closing credits with archival clippings and photos to be a nice touch as well. Too bad for Sadie.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"Conjuring" gave me the giggles as every tried and true element was trotted out on screen without boring CGI trickery. The acting was adequate, and the "true story" backbone complete with early 1970's setting was charming. I foung the closing credits with archival clippings and photos to be a nice touch as well. Too bad for Sadie.....

I agree the cast was quite decent, I'll give it that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Recently watched it. Was quite good, better than most horror flicks. Creeped me out for sure, with little blood, so it's more of a horror/thriller. I don't follow too many of the recent paranormal-related horror films so I can't compare. I found it to be like a mix between "The Others" and "The Exorcist". Haunted House story meets Satanic possession story.

The first 75% of the movie was excellent. The whole build up of the film was terrific, it really got you creeped out and fearing what will come next. The backstory and acting was quite effective. I was let down by the climax/ending though. It didn't quite live up to the scares you thought might happen based on the build-up from the first 3/4 of the movie. The climax was too short, and could have been scarier. The film always teased about frightening you, and you thought "well eventually this movie is going to let loose and try to scare the crap out of me" but never quite did, it could have delivered complete diabolical mayhem at the end but only half-delivered.

Still a really good horror film. I'd give about a 8.5/10. I was a fan of the original "Saw" (of course the sequels suck, but aren't made by the same team). Can't wait for the sequel of this flick if made by the same team!

Edited by Moonlight Graham
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,723
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    DACHSHUND
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

    • Ronaldo_ earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • babetteteets went up a rank
      Rookie
    • paradox34 went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • paradox34 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • phoenyx75 earned a badge
      First Post
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...