Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Sorry...please point out which ones....it often gets busy up in here and it is easy to miss some posts.

Pretty much all of them except for the first couple in this thread have the answer to your questions. You seem to be more interested in convincing Canadians to not to care about the US more than you seem to be interested in the reasons why Canadians are interested in the US. Every time they've given a reason as to why they're interested in the US, you've dismissed it for some reason (as if it weren't the real reason they're interested in the US) and every time I've given you an answer as to why Mrs. Bachmann ought to be recognized by everyone as a bag of nuts, you've said it doesn't affect her politics even though the article in the very first post makes it clear that it does.

And I trust that you've at least read the article in the OP.

Edited by dickwhitman
  • Replies 200
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

I'm sure we have them too, but so far none have been elected. :D

Oh, we've had a few elected, but none really rose to prominance that I can recall. The nearest would be Stockwell Day, but really, his only issue was he was religious, and he had to tone that down drastically.

Harper is Mr. Pragmatist. Comparing im to crazy people is simplistic and silly.

"A liberal is someone who claims to be open to all points of view — and then is surprised and offended to find there are other points of view.” William F Buckley

Posted (edited)

Pretty much all of them except for the first couple in this thread have the answer to your questions. You seem to be more interested in convincing Canadians to not to care about the US more than you seem to be interested in the reasons why Canadians are interested in the US. Every time they've given a reason as to why they're interested in the US, you've dismissed it for some reason (as if it wasn't the real reason they're interested in the US) and every time I've given you an answer as to why Mrs. Bachmann ought to be recognized by everyone as a bag of nuts, you've said it doesn't affect her politics even though the article in the very first post makes it clear that it does.

I think I was one of the first members to respond to your initial posts, and continued to do so on topic. That I refuse to adopt your "bag of nuts" opinion for Rep. Bachmann does not mean my opinion(s) are not valid. Why is it so important that "everyone" believe as you do with respect to Bachmann or religious zealotry ?

Bachmann's constituents sent her to Congress, multiple times knowing full well what she believes.

Edited by bush_cheney2004

Economics trumps Virtue. 

 

Posted (edited)

This may be a violation of forum rules. The mods have made it clear that we should not hurl insults at third parties or each other. You have done both in this thread.

Nonsense. I'm not saying the US is crazy. I'm not even saying Americans (as a group) are crazy. I'm saying they seem to have an awful lot of nuts in their electorate to keep electing so many crackpots to high office. But feel free to whine to the moderators if you like...

Edited by Argus

"A liberal is someone who claims to be open to all points of view — and then is surprised and offended to find there are other points of view.” William F Buckley

Posted

I think I was one of the first members to respond to your initial posts, and continued to do so on topic. That I refuse to adopt your "bag of nuts" opinion for Rep. Bachmann does not mean my opinion(s) are not valid. Why is it so important that "everyone" believe as you do with respect to Bachmann or religious zealotry ?

You don't have to agree with me, but if you wish to understand why people (be they American or Canadian) don't like her then you really ought to read what people have been saying on this forum. I don't agree with Mrs. Bachmann, but I understand why she believes the nonsense that she does.

Posted

You don't have to agree with me, but if you wish to understand why people (be they American or Canadian) don't like her then you really ought to read what people have been saying on this forum. I don't agree with Mrs. Bachmann, but I understand why she believes the nonsense that she does.

You wouldn't care to enlighten the rest of us, would you? The only thing that comes to mind is she's either not very smart, or a religious fanatic or both.

"A liberal is someone who claims to be open to all points of view — and then is surprised and offended to find there are other points of view.” William F Buckley

Posted

Nonsense. I'm not saying the US is crazy. I'm not even saying Americans are crazy. I'm saying they seem to have an awful lot of nuts in their electorate to keep electing so many crackpots to high office. But feel free to whine to the moderators if you like...

Even if that were true (it isn't), it is their American right to do so. Insulting third parties is a violation of forum rules, and serves no useful purpose.

Economics trumps Virtue. 

 

Posted

Bachmann's constituents sent her to Congress, multiple times knowing full well what she believes.

No one cares about her constituents, people are interested in attacking her here for their own pleasure for hopefully obvious reasons.

Posted

You don't have to agree with me, but if you wish to understand why people (be they American or Canadian) don't like her then you really ought to read what people have been saying on this forum. I don't agree with Mrs. Bachmann, but I understand why she believes the nonsense that she does.

I know exactly why many Americans (Canadians can't vote in the U.S. unless dualies) dislike Rep. Bachmann. She has the right to advocate for and represent her own interests and the like minded interests of others.

Economics trumps Virtue. 

 

Posted

No one here is questioning anyone's rights. Someone started this thread so that people could talk about why they don't like Michele Bachmann.

OK...but their reasons are moot as she is an elected member of the U.S. House of Representatives.

Economics trumps Virtue. 

 

Posted

No one cares about her constituents, people are interested in attacking her here for their own pleasure for hopefully obvious reasons.

I care about her constituents...they are my neighbours ! They deserve elected representation just like other Americans.

Economics trumps Virtue. 

 

Posted

I care about her constituents...they are my neighbours ! They deserve elected representation just like other Americans.

Don't they deserve representatives that care about them and not just about themselves?

"A liberal is someone who claims to be open to all points of view — and then is surprised and offended to find there are other points of view.” William F Buckley

Posted

OK...but their reasons are moot as she is an elected member of the U.S. House of Representatives.

Uhm, no, their reasons are entertainment, which is why we're here.

"A liberal is someone who claims to be open to all points of view — and then is surprised and offended to find there are other points of view.” William F Buckley

Posted

Don't they deserve representatives that care about them and not just about themselves?

No.....they deserve to make their own choices, regardless of "foreign" or "domestic" opinions/criticism about such choices.

Economics trumps Virtue. 

 

Posted

Even if that were true (it isn't), it is their American right to do so. Insulting third parties is a violation of forum rules, and serves no useful purpose.

Why do you believe so many Americans are so extreme* in their views?

*extreme as defined by both the mainstream of your own country as well as the mainstream of western democratic thinking.

"A liberal is someone who claims to be open to all points of view — and then is surprised and offended to find there are other points of view.” William F Buckley

Posted

No one cares about her constituents, people are interested in attacking her here for their own pleasure for hopefully obvious reasons.

I don't think people are so much attacking her (which serves no purpose here given we don't vote in her district) as expressing bafflement at how people like her keep getting elected and rising to prominence in an otherwise modern, western, democratic state.

"A liberal is someone who claims to be open to all points of view — and then is surprised and offended to find there are other points of view.” William F Buckley

Posted

Why do you believe so many Americans are so extreme* in their views?

*extreme as defined by both the mainstream of your own country as well as the mainstream of western democratic thinking.

Because they want to be, and it is their right to hold such views. Americans died for this option, starting with a violent boot to the ass of a monarchy and now fallen empire. That's why Canada watches America now.

Economics trumps Virtue. 

 

Posted

Never....so you see, Rep. Bachmann is the same as many others. So what's the problem? Why single her out (from Canada) ?

Because she's a nutbag. That's the view of the people who started this thread. Every time you're told this you seem to forget shortly thereafter. With that in mind, as well as my most generous contribution to the effort of holding your hand and walking you through the "why" of it all, I think my time in this thread is done.

Posted

Because they want to be, and it is their right to hold such views. Americans died for this option, starting with a violent boot to the ass of a monarchy and now fallen empire. That's why Canada watches America now.

That is not an answer to my question. But kudos on using it as yet another opportunity to taunt Canadians, even if ineffectively.

"A liberal is someone who claims to be open to all points of view — and then is surprised and offended to find there are other points of view.” William F Buckley

Posted

Because she's a nutbag. That's the view of the people who started this thread. Every time you're told this you seem to forget shortly thereafter. With that in mind, as well as my most generous contribution to the effort of holding your hand and walking you through the "why" of it all, I think my time in this thread is done.

Good, because you have succeeded in violating forum rules for insults to third parties and public figures.

Economics trumps Virtue. 

 

Posted (edited)

That is not an answer to my question. But kudos on using it as yet another opportunity to taunt Canadians, even if ineffectively.

Watching and commenting on Rep. Bachmann is certainly watching America.

Edited by bush_cheney2004

Economics trumps Virtue. 

 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,909
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    miawilliams3232
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

    • derek848 earned a badge
      First Post
    • Benz earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Videospirit earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Barquentine earned a badge
      Posting Machine
    • stindles earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...