Pliny Posted April 3, 2013 Report Posted April 3, 2013 http://www.denverpost.com/nationworld/ci_22933371/white-house-pushes-home-loans-people-weaker-credit Didn't government already try this? I know Pelosi and Reid really liked this idea in 2006. And Barney Franks was ecstatic. Clinton liked it, too. Banks are cautious. Quote I want to be in the class that ensures the classless society remains classless.
Shady Posted April 4, 2013 Report Posted April 4, 2013 This is another great example of the "smart" power of the Obama administration. Harper tightens mortgage standards while Obama looks to push the same crap that led to the housing bubble in the first place. What a disaster of a president. Quote
GostHacked Posted April 4, 2013 Report Posted April 4, 2013 This is another great example of the "smart" power of the Obama administration. Harper tightens mortgage standards while Obama looks to push the same crap that led to the housing bubble in the first place. What a disaster of a president.What we had here in Canada was a bail-in instead of a bailout. We have central banks tied into the global ponzi scheme. We will not be able to escape the financial troubles on the horizon. Remember the Canadian big 5 got the bail out last year that was not a bail out. But they still got capitol. If our banks were solid and not in any trouble at all, we would not have seen the 'non-bail-out' .... money even came from the US Fed to help out Canadian banks. So the banks are borrowing money from an entity that has no money to begin with since it is all created out of thin air. Gotta love devaluation. Quote
Shady Posted April 4, 2013 Report Posted April 4, 2013 What we had here in Canada was a bail-in instead of a bailout. We have central banks tied into the global ponzi scheme. We will not be able to escape the financial troubles on the horizon. Remember the Canadian big 5 got the bail out last year that was not a bail out. But they still got capitol. If our banks were solid and not in any trouble at all, we would not have seen the 'non-bail-out' .... money even came from the US Fed to help out Canadian banks. So the banks are borrowing money from an entity that has no money to begin with since it is all created out of thin air. Gotta love devaluation. Anything to give Obama a pass huh? Not surprised. Quote
Michael Hardner Posted April 4, 2013 Report Posted April 4, 2013 The "bail in" as exposed by the Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives was a government purchase of bank assets (I don't remember what kind) at a loss to the banks. Yes, the banks got money, but that's like saying the pawn shop that bought your diamond ring for $50 so you could pay back your bookie 'bailed you out'. He didn't end up on the short end of the deal. As for this - whatever it is - it's just stupid politics even if they're being more cautious than last time. Quote Click to learn why Climate Change is caused by HUMANS Michael Hardner
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.