Jump to content

Climate scientists keep getting it wrong


jacee

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1.4k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Sorry - where does this come from ? Are we going back to blogs again for this stuff ? I consider that a regression.

The blog itself is by an alarmist. The page linked is a fairly straightforward description of the technical issues involved in measuring the oceans. Blogs can be an invaluable source of information and need to be evaluated on a case by case basis. IMO, blanket statements that blogs are not acceptable links are a regression. Edited by TimG
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sorry - where does this come from ? Are we going back to blogs again for this stuff ? I consider that a regression.

I don't use blogs that often but if one can provide a layman's interpretation of complex science that I might consider helpful to others - I'll share it - regardless of which side of the debate the blogger might be on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's fine to have a blog if they explain their sources. My memory tells me that I couldn't find one on this blog. Therefore, as a source of primary information it's worse than useless and should be shunned.

Why? It is no worse than a wikipedia entry except in this case you know who wrote it.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's fine to have a blog if they explain their sources. My memory tells me that I couldn't find one on this blog. Therefore, as a source of primary information it's worse than useless and should be shunned.

Michael - what I've posted takes no position - it's general information that doesn't really require a "source". There's no real "position" taken - it's just a primer. Do you not find the information helpful for a layman? In our finer moments, isn't that what we're trying to do - share useful information?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Michael - what I've posted takes no position - it's general information that doesn't really require a "source". There's no real "position" taken - it's just a primer. Do you not find the information helpful for a layman? In our finer moments, isn't that what we're trying to do - share useful information?

Only if it's real information. I'm sorry but this topic is a minefield full of duds, so I am more careful than that. Thanks, though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,723
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    DACHSHUND
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

    • Ronaldo_ earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • babetteteets went up a rank
      Rookie
    • paradox34 went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • paradox34 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • phoenyx75 earned a badge
      First Post
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...