punked Posted April 19, 2012 Report Posted April 19, 2012 No...if people like you get their way there will be world war. See: Origins of WW2. You'd have let Germany do whatever it wanted, too. If we let Germany do whatever they wanted to the NAZIs would never have used the treaty of versailles in the first place to come to power. Just thought I would point out you don't get to change history. Quote
DogOnPorch Posted April 19, 2012 Report Posted April 19, 2012 If we let Germany do whatever they wanted to the NAZIs would never have used the treaty of versailles in the first place to come to power. Just thought I would point out you don't get to change history. Typical...blame Poland for WW2. Quote Nothing cracks a turtle like Leon Uris.
punked Posted April 19, 2012 Report Posted April 19, 2012 Typical...blame Poland for WW2. I am not blaming anyone for WW2. I am pointing out that your black and white views of the world are wrong. Quote
Guest Derek L Posted April 19, 2012 Report Posted April 19, 2012 Maybe just maybe their wont be a next world war. I know if people like you get their way there will be but lets just hope. You think I advocate war? Quite the opposite actually, but unilateral disarmament doesn’t ensure peace…….For nearly 50 years, the largest operators of nuclear weapons, ensured world peace with their collective arsenals……..to paraphrase, Peace was their Profession. Quote
punked Posted April 19, 2012 Report Posted April 19, 2012 You think I advocate war? Quite the opposite actually, but unilateral disarmament doesn’t ensure peace…….For nearly 50 years, the largest operators of nuclear weapons, ensured world peace with their collective arsenals……..to paraphrase, Peace was their Profession. No one is talking about disarmament. I just want the government to put this out to tender. Quote
cybercoma Posted April 19, 2012 Report Posted April 19, 2012 No one is talking about disarmament. I just want the government to put this out to tender. I just want the government to stop lying to parliament and defrauding the electorate. Quote
punked Posted April 19, 2012 Report Posted April 19, 2012 I just want the government to stop lying to parliament and defrauding the electorate. Well we wont get that from these guys. In the last pages they have lied time and time again just like the government. Quote
cybercoma Posted April 19, 2012 Report Posted April 19, 2012 You can't lie when you're being grossly misinformed by your favourite news outlets. Quote
Guest Derek L Posted April 19, 2012 Report Posted April 19, 2012 No one is talking about disarmament. I just want the government to put this out to tender. And that brings us full circle…….there is no other option than the F-35, hence putting the contract out to tender is futile………The debate should be whether we require a fighter force centered around the F-35 or no fighter force at all……….Purchasing a 4th + generation aircraft, at the cost of billions of dollars, with the intent to operate it until the 2050s is a waste of money. I asked this question and stated this fact numerous times when people suggest a Super Hornet like alternative: The Australians purchased 24 Super Hornets for 6.6 billion and intend on retiring them in the mid 2020s……What would that same purchase look like in terms of cost with ~triple the order and with a longer expected service life? Quote
punked Posted April 19, 2012 Report Posted April 19, 2012 And that brings us full circle…….there is no other option than the F-35, hence putting the contract out to tender is futile………The debate should be whether we require a fighter force centered around the F-35 or no fighter force at all……….Purchasing a 4th + generation aircraft, at the cost of billions of dollars, with the intent to operate it until the 2050s is a waste of money. I asked this question and stated this fact numerous times when people suggest a Super Hornet like alternative: The Australians purchased 24 Super Hornets for 6.6 billion and intend on retiring them in the mid 2020s……What would that same purchase look like in terms of cost with ~triple the order and with a longer expected service life? Yah all governments who are corrupt say putting something out to tender is a bad idea. Quote
Guest Derek L Posted April 19, 2012 Report Posted April 19, 2012 Yah all governments who are corrupt say putting something out to tender is a bad idea. Nice dodge......So you’re suggesting, all the F-35 partner nations Governments, over the last 10-15 years, many alternating between “right-wing” and “left-wing” political parties, are all corrupt? Quote
waldo Posted April 19, 2012 Report Posted April 19, 2012 I notice the US Navy is putting out a tender for a new fighter. http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2012/04/super-hornet-jsf/ bazinga! Son of Super Hornet... in case the JSF "flames out entirely"! Oh, is there a problem? Quote
Guest Derek L Posted April 19, 2012 Report Posted April 19, 2012 bazinga! Son of Super Hornet... in case the JSF "flames out entirely"! Oh, is there a problem? And the "son of Super Hornet" is what? Quote
waldo Posted April 19, 2012 Report Posted April 19, 2012 And the "son of Super Hornet" is what? see... U.S. Navy... looking! Quote
punked Posted April 19, 2012 Report Posted April 19, 2012 Nice dodge......So you’re suggesting, all the F-35 partner nations Governments, over the last 10-15 years, many alternating between “right-wing” and “left-wing” political parties, are all corrupt? The US put this out to tender and had a bidding process. The Dutch haven't even committed to buying the plane, Turkey who was talking about 13 planes has cuts its order 2 and looks like it is going with the Eurofighter Typhoons. So that is what cost to half of the JSF, in the other half of the countries opposition parties just like in Canada are asking Questions. Quote
punked Posted April 19, 2012 Report Posted April 19, 2012 (edited) bazinga! Son of Super Hornet... in case the JSF "flames out entirely"! Oh, is there a problem? I know and they just put that out last week. The more news the less good news for the other side of the argument. Edited April 19, 2012 by punked Quote
Guest Derek L Posted April 19, 2012 Report Posted April 19, 2012 see... U.S. Navy... looking! At the 6th generation of aircraft……..Your point? Quote
Guest Derek L Posted April 19, 2012 Report Posted April 19, 2012 The US put this out to tender and had a bidding process. Put what out to tender? The Dutch haven't even committed to buying the plane Source? Turkey who was talking about 13 planes has cuts its order 2 and looks like it is going with the Eurofighter Typhoons Source? So that is what cost to half of the JSF, in the other half of the countries opposition parties just like in Canada are asking Questions. Name a JSF partner nation that has pulled out? Quote
Guest Derek L Posted April 19, 2012 Report Posted April 19, 2012 I know and they just put that out last week. The more news the less good news for the other side of the argument. Boeing and General Dynamics (And Lockheed) have being working on the concepts of the 6th generation for years……hardly news. Quote
punked Posted April 19, 2012 Report Posted April 19, 2012 At the 6th generation of aircraft……..Your point? Why buy these planes if in 20 years there will be UAVs that can do the same thing as them making these planes already old? Quote
punked Posted April 19, 2012 Report Posted April 19, 2012 Put what out to tender? Source? Source? Name a JSF partner nation that has pulled out? Go look it all up. The US had a bidding process the F35 won their process and requirements. Quote
punked Posted April 19, 2012 Report Posted April 19, 2012 Boeing and General Dynamics (And Lockheed) have being working on the concepts of the 6th generation for years……hardly news. I know which is why when we said we were buying these f35s a lot of people said that if we can push it a few years this plane will be the plane of the past we will be stuck with. Quote
waldo Posted April 19, 2012 Report Posted April 19, 2012 At the 6th generation of aircraft……..Your point? my point? My point, following up on MLW member punked's point, is that you've leaped to a most disingenuous and self-serving interpretation - "6th generation aircraft"! In actuality, the linked article speaks to the U.S. Navy "hedging" against the failure of the F-35 program. All we've ever heard from youse guys is, "if not the F-35, then what"? Apparently, the U.S. Navy would also like an answer to that question. Go figure! Quote
Guest Derek L Posted April 19, 2012 Report Posted April 19, 2012 Go look it all up. The US had a bidding process the F35 won their process and requirements. Huh? Quote
Guest Derek L Posted April 19, 2012 Report Posted April 19, 2012 my point? My point, following up on MLW member punked's point, is that you've leaped to a most disingenuous and self-serving interpretation - "6th generation aircraft"! In actuality, the linked article speaks to the U.S. Navy "hedging" against the failure of the F-35 program. All we've ever heard from youse guys is, "if not the F-35, then what"? Apparently, the U.S. Navy would also like an answer to that question. Go figure! Go read the article again....... Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.