bush_cheney2004 Posted April 4, 2012 Author Report Share Posted April 4, 2012 Nah. He won't win. And next time he enters this pageant he wob't get past the qualifying round Trump might just put the fix in on this one, attracting much needed media attention to a dying franchise. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Black Dog Posted April 4, 2012 Report Share Posted April 4, 2012 Name calling, the last refuge of a failed argument. What's the failed argument? She may be genetically male, but identifies as female and has transitioned physically as much as possible. That's good enough for me. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest American Woman Posted April 4, 2012 Report Share Posted April 4, 2012 One can change their outside appearance. But they can't change their DNA. This is actually the first argument that makes sense to me. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stopstaaron Posted April 4, 2012 Report Share Posted April 4, 2012 And I suppose you're proof that if you're born an jerk, you stay one. I think you're being insanely too politically correct here. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bonam Posted April 4, 2012 Report Share Posted April 4, 2012 What's the failed argument? She may be genetically male, but identifies as female and has transitioned physically as much as possible. That's good enough for me. Whether you're male or female depends on your DNA. Mutilating your body and dowsing yourself in artificial hormones won't change that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stopstaaron Posted April 4, 2012 Report Share Posted April 4, 2012 (edited) According to black dog if I consider myself to be Bowser, then I am Bowser! and anyone who disagrees is a jerk or a Mario!! Edited April 4, 2012 by stopstaaron Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest American Woman Posted April 4, 2012 Report Share Posted April 4, 2012 So the DNA argument got me curious: Transsexual gene link identified DNA analysis from 112 male-to-female transsexual volunteers showed they were more likely to have a longer version of the androgen receptor gene. The genetic difference may cause weaker testosterone signals, the team reported in Biological Psychiatry. Increasingly, biological factors are being implicated in gender identity. So DNA apparently is not as simple as "male" or "female." Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Black Dog Posted April 4, 2012 Report Share Posted April 4, 2012 I think you're being insanely too politically correct here. What does that even mean? According to black dog if I consider myself to be Bowser, then I am Bowser! and anyone who disagrees is a jerk or a bigot!! No, but I can see why you'd interpret it that way given your propensity for one-dimensional thinking. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Black Dog Posted April 4, 2012 Report Share Posted April 4, 2012 So the DNA argument got me curious: Transsexual gene link identified DNA analysis from 112 male-to-female transsexual volunteers showed they were more likely to have a longer version of the androgen receptor gene. The genetic difference may cause weaker testosterone signals, the team reported in Biological Psychiatry. Increasingly, biological factors are being implicated in gender identity. So DNA apparently is not as simple as "male" or "female." Well how about that. Looks like even genetics is undermining the binary. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stopstaaron Posted April 4, 2012 Report Share Posted April 4, 2012 What does that even mean? It means you're forcing an issue where there shouldn't be any all in the name of insanity Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Black Dog Posted April 4, 2012 Report Share Posted April 4, 2012 It means you're forcing an issue where there shouldn't be any all in the name of insanity So transgenderism is mental illness now? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stopstaaron Posted April 4, 2012 Report Share Posted April 4, 2012 So transgenderism is mental illness now? No, I think maybe something isn't really right with their brains, same as homosexuals... that's the way they were born to think and feel this way, but I don't consider that mental illness I also think adults who are attracted to kids have some wiring wrong in the brain...some fight their whole lives to not be attracted but they just can't help it and eventually they act on it we don;t choose who we are or who we are attracted to, but if it harms anyone that person must be punished its sad that sometimes the brain is wired the wrong way as for this dude, he lied on his application, that is enough for me to consider him disqualified Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Black Dog Posted April 4, 2012 Report Share Posted April 4, 2012 No, I think maybe something isn't really right with their brains, same as homosexuals... that's the way they were born to think and feel this way, but I don't consider that mental illness So why use the word "insanity?" I also think adults who are attracted to kids have some wiring wrong in the brain...some fight their whole lives to not be attracted but they just can't help it and eventually they act on itwe don;t choose who we are or who we are attracted to, but if it harms anyone that person must be punished its sad that sometimes the brain is wired the wrong way So what's the "right" way? Dad at work, Mom in the kitchen, 2.5 kids, the whole heteronormative bit? The "wrong way" GTFO. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stopstaaron Posted April 4, 2012 Report Share Posted April 4, 2012 (edited) So why use the word "insanity?" So what's the "right" way? Dad at work, Mom in the kitchen, 2.5 kids, the whole heteronormative bit? The "wrong way" GTFO. Excuse me but you're being ridiculous here. All I said was sometimes people aren't born the way they should have been but that I don't consider them to be mentally ill. I think everyone is born with the intention that someday they will be given the chance to pro create... now, somehow during the process something can go wrong and make that not a reality. Some straight women and men can't make babies. Gay people who are capable of pro creating be aren't attracted to the opposite sex. The brain and the human body is a very complicated thing. It's a well known fact that people do not choose who they are attracted to so why are you still telling me to GTFO? do you disagree? Are you claiming that sometimes people are born with the sole intent on molesting children? People aren't who they are because that is the way they are supposed to be, they are that way because something in the brain misfired Edited April 4, 2012 by stopstaaron Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Black Dog Posted April 4, 2012 Report Share Posted April 4, 2012 Excuse me but you're being ridiculous here. All I said was sometimes people aren't born the way they should have been but that I don't consider them to be mentally ill. Sorry did you write this or not: It means you're forcing an issue where there shouldn't be any all in the name of insanity If you didn't mean transgenderism, what did you mean? I think everyone is born with the intention that someday they will be given the chance to pro create... now, somehow during the process something can go wrong and make that not a reality. Some straight women and men can't make babies. Gay people who are capable of pro creating be aren't attracted to the opposite sex. The brain and the human body is a very complicated thing. It's a well known fact that people do not choose who they are attracted to so why are you still telling me to GTFO? do you disagree? I'm saying your categorical dismissal as transgendered peeps as disordered and "wrong" is just the same old bullshit we've heard for ages as justification for depriving other groups (gays, blacks) of equal treatment and basic respect 9for example, your smug insistence on referring to the person in this case as "he"). You claim not to be a bigot yet here you are, treading a path blazed for you by bigots. Are you claiming that sometimes people are born with the sole intent on molesting children? People aren't who they are because that is the way they are supposed to be, they are that way because something in the brain misfired. I don't take issue with the idea that this stuff may have biological causes so much as I do the implication that there is a "correct" way to be. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Manny Posted April 4, 2012 Report Share Posted April 4, 2012 Well the good news is if it's genetic, there might be therapy or a cure for it someday. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stopstaaron Posted April 4, 2012 Report Share Posted April 4, 2012 Sorry did you write this or not: If you didn't mean transgenderism, what did you mean? When I said politically correct insanity I was referring to you, you would argue that a donkey should be in a pageant meant for bears just because you want to be on the opposite side of the argument. I'm saying your categorical dismissal as transgendered peeps as disordered and "wrong" is just the same old bullshit we've heard for ages as justification for depriving other groups (gays, blacks) of equal treatment and basic respect 9for example, your smug insistence on referring to the person in this case as "he"). You claim not to be a bigot yet here you are, treading a path blazed for you by bigots. So you are saying they were born this way on purpose and that biological differences did not cause this... that is what it looks like... as for depriving other groups.. I think there is a difference between denying people the right to marry and denying the rights for black people that white people have ... and denying the right to take part in a beauty pageant that they lied to get into in the first place... get a clue please before you start calling people bigots, there is something clearly wrong with your brain that you must call people a bigot all the time, grow up dude The very fact that you compared this to people discriminating against gay people & black people is utterly ridiculous, not every friggin discrimination is on the same level of that and this clearly IS NOT I don't take issue with the idea that this stuff may have biological causes so much as I do the implication that there is a "correct" way to be. Apparently you did Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stopstaaron Posted April 4, 2012 Report Share Posted April 4, 2012 Well the good news is if it's genetic, there might be therapy or a cure for it someday. There will never be a cure, the brain is too complicated. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Black Dog Posted April 4, 2012 Report Share Posted April 4, 2012 When I said politically correct insanity I was referring to you, you would argue that a donkey should be in a pageant meant for bears just because you want to be on the opposite side of the argument. Sure whatever. So you are saying they were born this way on purpose and that biological differences did not cause this... that is what it looks like... Not to anyone who know how to read it doesn't. as for depriving other groups.. I think there is a difference between denying people the right to marry and denying the rights for black people that white people have ... and denying the right to take part in a beauty pageant that they lied to get into in the first place... It's a difference of degree not kind. get a clue please before you start calling people bigots, there is something clearly wrong with your brain that you must call people a bigot all the time, grow up dude I consider your attitude towards the individual in question in this thread to be very intolerant and worthy of the label. The very fact that you compared this to people discriminating against gay people & black people is utterly ridiculous, not every friggin discrimination is on the same level of that and this clearly IS NOT Again, not the same level, but of the same ilk. Apparently you did Where? Cite? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stopstaaron Posted April 4, 2012 Report Share Posted April 4, 2012 Black Dog, you don't have to pander to transgendered people to consider yourself a left winger. I am a left winger and I don't pander. It's not a prerequisite. Just informing you! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Black Dog Posted April 4, 2012 Report Share Posted April 4, 2012 Black Dog, you don't have to pander to transgendered people to consider yourself a left winger. I am a left winger and I don't pander. It's not a prerequisite. Just informing you! This line wasn't funny the first time you posted it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stopstaaron Posted April 4, 2012 Report Share Posted April 4, 2012 This line wasn't funny the first time you posted it. 2/3rds of the posters on the CBC article were not agreeing with you and they are left wingers too just sayin' but hey, apparently they are bigots too You just can't help but use the word "bigot", I think "bigot" should not be used on MLW Maybe we should see what Michael says about it Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest American Woman Posted April 4, 2012 Report Share Posted April 4, 2012 2/3rds of the posters on the CBC article were not agreeing with you and they are left wingers too just sayin' but hey, apparently they are bigots too You are doing more than disagreeing; you keep referring to a human being as "it." If you think she's still a male, if you cannot see her as a female, that's one thing - but to refer to her as "it" does speak for itself - and what it says goes beyond "a difference of opinion." Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stopstaaron Posted April 4, 2012 Report Share Posted April 4, 2012 (edited) You are doing more than disagreeing; you keep referring to a human being as "it." If you think she's still a male, if you cannot see her as a female, that's one thing - but to refer to her as "it" does speak for itself - and what it says goes beyond "a difference of opinion." Haven't referred to him as an it for like a week now, really get a clue AW since page 3 http://www.mapleleafweb.com/forums//index.php?showtopic=20599&view=findpost&p=778113 This is now on page 20 Edited April 4, 2012 by stopstaaron Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest American Woman Posted April 4, 2012 Report Share Posted April 4, 2012 Haven't referred to him as an it for like a week now, really get a clue AW Get a clue yourself. You think that erases what you've said before? You're not important enough for me o take note of when/if you stopped referring to her that way. I recall all of the posts where you did, and that speaks for itself. BTW, I found this defense of referring to her as "it" ironic: "It" is a person, just like you. Are you an "It"? There was a Cousin Itt many years ago....before your time. I really don't care what I'm called. Evidently you do care, since you are objecting to being called a bigot. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.