Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

This thread speaks for itself

Maybe it does, but it speaks better with emoticons:

:blink: This thread speaks for itself

This thread speaks for itself :rolleyes:

This thread speaks for itself :P

The statement is improved with those darn annoying smilies.

In fact, putting the smily before or after the sentence alters the interpretation.

If a believer demands that I, as a non-believer, observe his taboos in the public domain, he is not asking for my respect but for my submission. And that is incompatible with a secular democracy. Flemming Rose (Dutch journalist)

My biggest takeaway from economics is that the past wasn't as good as you remember, the present isn't as bad as you think, and the future will be better than you anticipate. Morgan Housel http://www.fool.com/investing/general/2016/01/14/things-im-pretty-sure-about.aspx

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

OK, thanks!

Now it is time to edit out ridiculous acronyms like LOL and ROFLMAO, etc.

If one is too lazy to say what they want to say, they should not infect public forums with their laziness.

That is not saying that acceptable acronyms are not acceptable. Like GM, IBM, NDP etc.

Posted

Well said, AW.

Too bad some people are too stupid to not understand this. :lol:

Why are you calling other people on this forum stupid?

Do you not believe that your comments may be offensive to some?

WWWTT

Maple Leaf Web is now worth $720.00! Down over $1,500 in less than one year! Total fail of the moderation on this site! That reminds me, never ask Greg to be a business partner! NEVER!

Posted

You want to know what's an annoyance for me? Yours, and a couple of others, constant "troll" accusations. If there were only an option to disable that, I'd be right on it - because that's really annoying to the accused as well as others who are trying to have an actual discussion.

So fyi, you were doing more than 'informing people about the ability to disable smilies' - you opined that they are "derisive," "obnoxious," "take away from the conversations," and are used by "trolls" - and then you act all surprised at the responses and accuse people of tying to turn a simple 'informative' post "into an argument."

:rolleyes:<rolls eyes>

Why can you not accept that some people feel that the rolling eyes/smiley faces find them annoying?

WWWTT

Maple Leaf Web is now worth $720.00! Down over $1,500 in less than one year! Total fail of the moderation on this site! That reminds me, never ask Greg to be a business partner! NEVER!

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

I'm surprised some take offense to them. Whatever I guess.

Almost every time I see a smiley it's meant as a derisive insult to whomever is being addressed.

It is an inverted moral calculus that tries to persuade the world to demonize one state that tries its civilized best to abide in a difficult time and place, and rides merrily by the examples and practices of dozens of states and leaderships that drop into brutality every day without a twinge of regret or a whisper of condemnation. - Rex Murphy

Posted

Why are you calling other people on this forum stupid?

If someone does not understand the point of a smiley face being used on a forum when that smiley face is clearly used to set a certain tone then, yes, that person is stupid.

That form of stupidity may be the same as when two people are talking face to face and one lacks the emotional skills to read facial expressions and tone of voice.

It is stupidity nonetheless - as in mental dullness.

You and CC and certain others may prefer to carry on in a certain "intellectual" dull drone like tone but most of us like to poke fun at others ( :P ) or ensure that our sarcasm is understood ( :rolleyes: ) and/or like to comment on others paranoia ( :ph34r: ) etc....

See my post above where it is clear to all but the most tone deaf that adding emoticons changes one's understanding of what has been written.

Do you not believe that your comments may be offensive to some?

WWWTT

That happens when people discuss things. BFD.

Some people are so sensitive that I'm sure a sighting of a :rolleyes: brings them to tears. :rolleyes:

If a believer demands that I, as a non-believer, observe his taboos in the public domain, he is not asking for my respect but for my submission. And that is incompatible with a secular democracy. Flemming Rose (Dutch journalist)

My biggest takeaway from economics is that the past wasn't as good as you remember, the present isn't as bad as you think, and the future will be better than you anticipate. Morgan Housel http://www.fool.com/investing/general/2016/01/14/things-im-pretty-sure-about.aspx

Posted

Almost every time I see a smiley it's meant as a derisive insult to whomever is being addressed.

You see it that way because that's how people respond to you.

I have often used, and seen, the :P emoticon used in a playful way - as if to say I'm poking a bit of fun at you.

That you see these being used in a derisive way says much more about you then it does about the use of emoticons.

If a believer demands that I, as a non-believer, observe his taboos in the public domain, he is not asking for my respect but for my submission. And that is incompatible with a secular democracy. Flemming Rose (Dutch journalist)

My biggest takeaway from economics is that the past wasn't as good as you remember, the present isn't as bad as you think, and the future will be better than you anticipate. Morgan Housel http://www.fool.com/investing/general/2016/01/14/things-im-pretty-sure-about.aspx

Posted

That you see these being used in a derisive way says much more about you then it does about the use of emoticons.

When someone mocks your opinion and adds lots of :lol: to it there is not the slightest doubt what the smiley is intended to convey. And the people who use them the most often are the ones who insult people the most often. Hardly a coincidence.

It is an inverted moral calculus that tries to persuade the world to demonize one state that tries its civilized best to abide in a difficult time and place, and rides merrily by the examples and practices of dozens of states and leaderships that drop into brutality every day without a twinge of regret or a whisper of condemnation. - Rex Murphy

Posted

When someone mocks your opinion and adds lots of :lol: to it there is not the slightest doubt what the smiley is intended to convey. And the people who use them the most often are the ones who insult people the most often. Hardly a coincidence.

The people who get them the most are usually the most deserving.

If a believer demands that I, as a non-believer, observe his taboos in the public domain, he is not asking for my respect but for my submission. And that is incompatible with a secular democracy. Flemming Rose (Dutch journalist)

My biggest takeaway from economics is that the past wasn't as good as you remember, the present isn't as bad as you think, and the future will be better than you anticipate. Morgan Housel http://www.fool.com/investing/general/2016/01/14/things-im-pretty-sure-about.aspx

Posted

The people who get them the most are usually the most deserving.

Says one who doubtless uses them so much to make up for a lack of communication skills.

Maybe if you'd learn how to better express your opinion in writing you wouldn't need smilies to show your disdain for other people's opinions.

It is an inverted moral calculus that tries to persuade the world to demonize one state that tries its civilized best to abide in a difficult time and place, and rides merrily by the examples and practices of dozens of states and leaderships that drop into brutality every day without a twinge of regret or a whisper of condemnation. - Rex Murphy

Posted

Says one who doubtless uses them so much to make up for a lack of communication skills.

Maybe if you'd learn how to better express your opinion in writing you wouldn't need smilies to show your disdain for other people's opinions.

:rolleyes:

:lol:

If a believer demands that I, as a non-believer, observe his taboos in the public domain, he is not asking for my respect but for my submission. And that is incompatible with a secular democracy. Flemming Rose (Dutch journalist)

My biggest takeaway from economics is that the past wasn't as good as you remember, the present isn't as bad as you think, and the future will be better than you anticipate. Morgan Housel http://www.fool.com/investing/general/2016/01/14/things-im-pretty-sure-about.aspx

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Popular Now

  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,923
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    Jordan Parish
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

    • LinkSoul60 went up a rank
      Collaborator
    • MDP earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • MDP earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • LinkSoul60 went up a rank
      Enthusiast
    • Matthew earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...