Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I want to point out WITH NO EVIDENCE what so ever that any NDP member has been upgraded ever TimG has created a false equivalent. For there even to be an equivalent Tim you must first show a NDP upgrade. I will wait and ask you every post you make in this thread for you to prove that. Until you do, I must say you look silly and misinformed to create such information out of thin air.

  • Replies 125
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted (edited)
For there even to be an equivalent Tim you must first show a NDP upgrade. I will wait and ask you every post you make in this thread for you to prove that.
NDP MPs travel a lot. Some NDP MPs have Super Elite on Air Canada. These MPs will get upgrades all of the time. Some will be with their earned credits. Some will be complementary for any number of reasons. These are indisputable facts from the point of view of anyone who spends a lot of time flying. Suggesting that some of those upgrades were 'payback' from union members is innuendo just like the innuendo in this thread about Raitt.

What the thread has is NO evidence that there was anything untoward about Raitt's upgrade. In fact, even if she was upgraded by the COO as 'payback' there is no evidence that she knew this had happened. She would have shown up in the airport like she always has. She would have been handled a business class upgrade like she has received many many times. She would have assumed her staff used her points or maybe she assume it was an overbooking issue. She would have had no way to know that it was a special deal and would have had no reason to question it.

So unless you can provide some evidence that Raitt received a special deal and that she was aware of it then you got nothing.

Edited by TimG
Posted (edited)

NDP MPs travel a lot. Some NDP MPs have Super Elite on Air Canada. These MPs will get upgrades all of the time. Some will be with their earned credits. Some will be complementary for any number of reasons. These are indisputable facts from the point of view of anyone who spends a lot of time flying.

whether or not you are right, the labour minister has to abide by a different set of ethics

than a regular mp would

Edited by olp1fan
Posted
whether or not you are right, the labour minister has to abide by a different set of ethics than a regular mp would
Can you prove she even knew it was a special deal? Not a chance. Without that evidence you point is meaningless.
Posted

Can you prove she even knew it was a special deal? Not a chance. Without that evidence you point is meaningless.

she could not explain why the COOs personal signature was on the document

im not saying she took a bribe or a favour in " good faith that she will help him"

but its enough to investigate

Posted (edited)
she could not explain why the COOs personal signature was on the document
You mean the document she only found out about because some union hack leaked it the press? You have no evidence that she was aware of this document before the leak. She likely showed up at the airport and was handed the upgrade with no explanation - just like she has done many times in the past. She had no way to know this particular upgrade was 'special' (and that assumes that it was). Edited by TimG
Posted

Seems like the government is going after unions who strike and would hurt the economy if they went on strike. So does this mean they are going after all unions or just the ones that interfere in their daily lives? I don't remember any Feds acting the way this government does towards workers.

In 1997, Chretien Liberals passed back to work legislation to end a 2 week old postal strike. In 2007, under a Conservative government, the postal workers negotiated a settlement without striking. In the recent strike, postal workers were legislated back to work following a two week strike. Looks like both the Liberals and the Conservatives believe postal services are important to the country's economy.

"We always want the best man to win an election. Unfortunately, he never runs." Will Rogers

Posted

In 1997, Chretien Liberals passed back to work legislation to end a 2 week old postal strike. In 2007, under a Conservative government, the postal workers negotiated a settlement without striking. In the recent LOCKOUT, postal workers were legislated back to work WITH AN UNFAVORABLE CONTRACT following a two week LOCKOUT. Looks like both the Liberals and the Conservatives believe postal services are important to the country's economy.

AFAIK the Liberals didn't reward Canada post execs for causing the stop in postal service.

"You can lead a Conservative to knowledge, but you can't make him think."

Posted
AFAIK the Liberals didn't reward Canada post execs for causing the stop in postal service.
So you are saying Libs rewarded the union for stopping the postal service? Why is that better?
Posted

she could not explain why the COOs personal signature was on the document

Assuming there was a signature on the upgrade confirmation, was it the COO's personal signature, or a signature on a form, commonly issued to other upgrade customers? Do we know what the score is on that count?

If I receive a statement of my Shoppers Drug Mart Optimum card points and it bears the signature of the company president or the director of marketing, I'm not so stupid as to think said president or director actually personally signed the statement.

"We always want the best man to win an election. Unfortunately, he never runs." Will Rogers

Posted

Assuming there was a signature on the upgrade confirmation, was it the COO's personal signature, or a signature on a form, commonly issued to other upgrade customers? Do we know what the score is on that count?

That's what I'm wondering. That's why I said that this doesn't smell right. Why would she do something so obvious? I don't believe it.

Posted (edited)
Assuming there was a signature on the upgrade confirmation, was it the COO's personal signature, or a signature on a form, commonly issued to other upgrade customers? Do we know what the score is on that count?
All of this stuff is done electronically. There are no pieces of paper handed out with signatures on them. Air Canada may have those docs for internal purposes but the passenger would never see them.

The process works like this: you request an upgrade when you check in or online. You show up at the gate and wait to see if your name is called. If you are called you are handed a new bording pass. Sometimes you may not request an upgrade and your name will get called and you are given a bording pass. There is nothing on the bording pass that explains why you got the upgrade. Most people won't even ask why - they are just happy to get it. In fact, the check in agents usually don't have a clue why - the computer chooses the names using some cryptic algorithm that combines your status and the price you paid for your ticket.

I do not believe there was any way for Raitt to know that AC COO had done her a favour unless he called her up and told her. There is no evidence that he did.

Edited by TimG
Posted

So are those NDP MPs going submit all records of the upgrades they have received over the years and the explanation for them? I doubt that. It would make them look bad.

Red-herring. Other people's questionable activities don't make the Minister's activities any better.

Posted (edited)
Red-herring. Other people's questionable activities don't make the Minister's activities any better.
Well, I yet to see any evidence that the minister engaged in questionable activities since no one has provided any evidence that the minister knew the upgrade was not a normal upgrade given to frequent flyers. People who are suggesting that she did engage in questionable activities are basically making crap up at this point. Edited by TimG
Posted

Well, I yet to see any evidence that the minister engaged in questionable activities since no one has provided any evidence that the minister knew the upgrade was not a normal upgrade given to frequent flyers. People who are suggesting that she did engage in questionable activities are basically making crap up at this point.

What's your point? You're still running off on tangents about things that have nothing to do with the topic, as though they excuse the allegations.

Posted (edited)
What's your point? You're still running off on tangents about things that have nothing to do with the topic, as though they excuse the allegations.
My point is the "allegations" have no more substance than my "allegations" about NDP MPs. There is nothing to excuse unless someone can demonstrate that she knew the upgrade was a special deal authorized by the COO when she got on that plane. Edited by TimG
Posted

My point is the "allegations" have no more substance than my "allegations" about NDP MPs. There is nothing to excuse unless someone can demonstrate that she knew the upgrade was a special deal authorized by the COO when she got on that plane.

Bunk Mooreland will get her to confess

Posted

OH MY GOD! Her flight was upgraded to Business Class for a flight from Ottawa to Toronto. This is an incredible scandal. She should step down and Harper should resign!......and Harper's involved, you can bet on that. What did he know....and when did he know it. A Public Inquiry is the only way to get to the bottom of this.....and until it's resolved, Raitt should step down. From Ottawa to Toronto. Oh my God!

Must have been a slow news day. ;)

Back to Basics

Posted

OH MY GOD! Her flight was upgraded to Business Class for a flight from Ottawa to Toronto. This is an incredible scandal. She should step down and Harper should resign!......and Harper's involved, you can bet on that. What did he know....and when did he know it. A Public Inquiry is the only way to get to the bottom of this.....and until it's resolved, Raitt should step down. From Ottawa to Toronto. Oh my God!

Must have been a slow news day.

I agree. I mean, having a Minister - who is directly involved in a labour dispute and will be directly involved in back-to-work legislation for workers - getting perks from an executive in the same company... nah, that's nothing.

What's a little grift between friends, eh?

Posted

OH MY GOD! Her flight was upgraded to Business Class for a flight from Ottawa to Toronto. This is an incredible scandal. She should step down and Harper should resign!......and Harper's involved, you can bet on that. What did he know....and when did he know it. A Public Inquiry is the only way to get to the bottom of this.....and until it's resolved, Raitt should step down. From Ottawa to Toronto. Oh my God!

Must have been a slow news day. ;)

I was about to give a huge reply to this, but then it occurred to me what your screen name actually means.

Posted

Everyone is assuming stuff here. Some are assuming it's a conflict of interest some are assuming it's a smear job. No one knows.

Even if the Air Canada was trying to bribe her, It's on them, not her. She's had this position that AC people can't strike for months now. I don't a single perk like this would really affect public policy.

It's sorta like when the PM wanted to go see a hockey game recently people flipped out on him for trying to use his influence to get more tickets.

He's sort of the leader of the country. Perhaps he deserves a few perks?

Posted

Weren't we arguing about positions of trust here recently? Something about some Chinese reporter? If the Minister of Labour, and I'm not saying it did happen, but if she received a gratuity from the company she is now backing with union-busting legislation, then it would indeed be a conflict of interest and that's on her.

Posted

Everyone is assuming stuff here. Some are assuming it's a conflict of interest some are assuming it's a smear job. No one knows.

Cheech to Chong: "Good thing we didn't step in it man..."

Even if the Air Canada was trying to bribe her, It's on them, not her. She's had this position that AC people can't strike for months now. I don't a single perk like this would really affect public policy.

I get it. Sort of like someone slipping some money into the cops pocket while he isn't looking. He finds it, exclaims his glee and spends it.

It's sorta like when the PM wanted to go see a hockey game recently people flipped out on him for trying to use his influence to get more tickets.

He's sort of the leader of the country. Perhaps he deserves a few perks?

Why, did Bettman swing some sweet tix while the PM was contemplating back to work legislation for NHL players? Sort of...? :D

Posted

Weren't we arguing about positions of trust here recently? Something about some Chinese reporter? If the Minister of Labour, and I'm not saying it did happen, but if she received a gratuity from the company she is now backing with union-busting legislation, then it would indeed be a conflict of interest and that's on her.

Apparently she's revealed that she got the upgrade on points.

This is such a non-story.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,906
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    Henry Blackstone
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

    • Doowangle earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Doowangle earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Barquentine went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dave L earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Ana Silva earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...