Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Oh for sure...the Holocaust was small potatoes. Hardly anything happened. Either way...get a refund.

The Canadian Holocaust seems like small potatoes. Although they sported a higher death rate then the Jewish Holocast, and the death rate lasted for decades at a time. First Nations don't get the type reports and news that would have showed the rest of the world, how genocidal Canada is and was.

First Nations could easily call any residential school a death camp, because thats exactly what they were. All the while, Immigrants profited off of First Nations resources and lands, without ever winning a war, or having to go to war for the land.

Edited by Chippewa

Canada-- Just A Hotbed For Laundering First Nations Land and Resources

  • Replies 157
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

The Canadian Holocaust seems like small potatoes. Although they sported a higher death rate then the Jewish Holocast, and the death rate lasted for decades at a time. First Nations don't get the type reports and news that would have showed the rest of the world, how genocidal Canada is and was.

First Nations could easily call any residential school a death camp, because thats exactly what they were. All the while, Immigrants profited off of First Nations resources and lands, without ever winning a war, or having to go to war for the land.

Bullshit. You keep harpin about his 51%, but at worst that is 51% of children who went to the schools. The 44% Jewish rate is 44% of ALL JEWS.

How many natives even lived in Canada at the beginning of the residential school policy?

Posted

The Canadian Holocaust seems like small potatoes. Although they sported a higher death rate then the Jewish Holocast, and the death rate lasted for decades at a time. First Nations don't get the type reports and news that would have showed the rest of the world, how genocidal Canada is and was.

First Nations could easily call any residential school a death camp, because thats exactly what they were. All the while, Immigrants profited off of First Nations resources and lands, without ever winning a war, or having to go to war for the land.

It's not a comparable situation.

What was done to First Nations is horrific enough. Providing misleading analogies, especially framed as a pissing contest between victims, doesn't help anything.

As scarce as truth is, the supply has always been in excess of the demand.

--Josh Billings

Posted

Bullshit. You keep harpin about his 51%, but at worst that is 51% of children who went to the schools. The 44% Jewish rate is 44% of ALL JEWS.

How many natives even lived in Canada at the beginning of the residential school policy?

are we getting so pathetic we are arguing which death rate was worse. Some reports that with the Biological warfare from North American Governments or (Smallpox) blankets and disease that was distributed, that between 70% and 90% of the Native Population was exterminated, and almost to extinction, with the extinction of total tribes, languages, and cultures.

The Jews still have there culture, language, and a homelands to call there own. First Nations have reserves or Ghettos and own less then 1% of the land in Canada.

You have to factor in, that in the U.S.A, the Indian Removal Policy allowed monetary rewards for brutal murders like "Scalping". Some would pay 10 cents a scalp as a bounty on FIrst Nations people in North America. Hitler wouldn't even get that brutal by having brutal murders payed with a bounty. Although the result of death was the same in both instances. So I would disagree that the Jews had it worse then First Nations. We are talking about decades of oppression, not just a part of a decade. Look at Canada for instance, they turned away a boatload of Jewish people during the second world war, and sent them back to death camps or wherever. Just shows that WW2 was never about saving any people, other then caucazoids in europe.

Canada-- Just A Hotbed For Laundering First Nations Land and Resources

Posted

It's not a comparable situation.

What was done to First Nations is horrific enough. Providing misleading analogies, especially framed as a pissing contest between victims, doesn't help anything.

I find this type of argumentation barely a notch above the "my dad can beat up your dad" level of argumentation we see in elementary school. And I am absolutely serious.

My blog - bobinisrael.blogspot.com - I am writing on it, again!

Posted (edited)

I find this type of argumentation barely a notch above the "my dad can beat up your dad" level of argumentation we see in elementary school. And I am absolutely serious.

I don't see any reason to take it seriously.

Edited by bloodyminded

As scarce as truth is, the supply has always been in excess of the demand.

--Josh Billings

Posted

No pissing contest necessary. Genocide is horrific whenever, wherever, however, whoever, whyever. Insufficient as they may be, there are processes for prosecution and restitution. Education is a really important part of that. It's just beginning 'officially' and openly in Canada with an official apology from government that allows public discussion. There was no mention of genocide and only a passing reference that "some children died". The apology and the Truth and Reconciliation Commission both resulted from Canadian court settlement of a class action suit. Chippewa is right that so far the UN refuses to prosecute Canada in international court, but the UN is very much aware and involved as supervisor of the Commission. The Commissioner has reported publicly that there were many more deaths of children in the residential schools being reported by survivors than they expected, "thousands" . Hearings are still going on about the residential schools. Maybe the

North American genocide is more controversial because it's still less well known to the general public ... but I'm certainly not trying to start a debate - pissing contest - about that.

What do we do now that we are starting to know the truth? It's really something we have to answer to ourselves I guess. I will say one thing about what Chippewa asked: Why did us 32m immigrants come to Canada? Usually because the wealthy Lairds, land barons, corporations, occupiers, etc. Forced us off our lands in our homelands.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      11,017
    • Most Online
      2,945

    Newest Member
    taylor66
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

    • Gtechalax earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Gtechalax earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Gtechalax earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Canadaisintrouble earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • AlizyMalik earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...