Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

That's it, run away coward.

Typical Con.

Don't think of it as running away. Think of it as laughing in contempt and pity, shaking my head, and moving on to find grownups to converse with.

It is an inverted moral calculus that tries to persuade the world to demonize one state that tries its civilized best to abide in a difficult time and place, and rides merrily by the examples and practices of dozens of states and leaderships that drop into brutality every day without a twinge of regret or a whisper of condemnation. - Rex Murphy

  • Replies 183
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

"Jealous" of Harper?

:blink:

What an odd speculation.

Well, I find your "reasoning" odd also. Not to mention bitter, mean-spirited and spiteful. Your beloved Liberals were brought down because of far, far worse transgressions than Harper and the CPC have ever tried. Until the LPC cleans up its act and purges the leeches things will only get worse for them. Liberal attempts to tar Harper with the same brush are futile - and, most smart, ethical and moral Canadians can see their phoniness for what it is.

Posted

Well, I find your "reasoning" odd also. Not to mention bitter, mean-spirited and spiteful.

Out of curiosity, can you specifically point to the post(s) where BM is bitter, mean-spirited and spiteful?

If a believer demands that I, as a non-believer, observe his taboos in the public domain, he is not asking for my respect but for my submission. And that is incompatible with a secular democracy. Flemming Rose (Dutch journalist)

My biggest takeaway from economics is that the past wasn't as good as you remember, the present isn't as bad as you think, and the future will be better than you anticipate. Morgan Housel http://www.fool.com/investing/general/2016/01/14/things-im-pretty-sure-about.aspx

Posted (edited)

Your beloved Liberals were brought down because of far, far worse transgressions than Harper and the CPC have ever tried.

Call me dense, but I really don't understand why it is less reprehensible for the CPC to divert money to inappropriate, self-serving uses (and lie about it) than it was for assorted Liberals to do the same.

At least the Liberals had whistle-blowers within, objectingand bringing the sins to light. CPC operatives seem to be defending their crap at almost any cost.

Edited by Molly

"Pay no attention to the man behind the curtain!"

— L. Frank Baum

"For Conservatives, ministerial responsibility seems to be a temporary and constantly shifting phenomenon," -- Goodale

Posted

P.M Harper has a long way to go to catch up with all of the recent leaders. So he went to a hockey game to relax a bitand he is paying a commercial fee back, can everyone just get over it and worry about more serious things, like Somali Canadians joing Al Queda orOur farmlands turning into subdivisions or crime in many cities. etc

Posted

P.M Harper has a long way to go to catch up with all of the recent leaders. So he went to a hockey game to relax a bitand he is paying a commercial fee back, can everyone just get over it and worry about more serious things, like Somali Canadians joing Al Queda orOur farmlands turning into subdivisions or crime in many cities. etc

"Move along. Move along. Nothing to see here, so move along."

"Pay no attention to the man behind the curtain."

I don't particularly care that Mr. Harper went to the hockey game, but the 'Leave Dear Leader alone!' defensiveness is enough to get the old gag reflex revved right up.

"Pay no attention to the man behind the curtain!"

— L. Frank Baum

"For Conservatives, ministerial responsibility seems to be a temporary and constantly shifting phenomenon," -- Goodale

Posted

As I said before, IF the Conservative Party won't pay for their leaders entertainment travels, why should the taxpayers??? They did when Mulroney was PM, the Tories are always boosting they have lots on money and I'm sure their 40% supporters would be more than happy to pay the $10,000. right, guys??

Posted

As I said before, IF the Conservative Party won't pay for their leaders entertainment travels, why should the taxpayers??? They did when Mulroney was PM, the Tories are always boosting they have lots on money and I'm sure their 40% supporters would be more than happy to pay the $10,000. right, guys??

Careful, Topaz! Sauce for the goose...

The other parties are so poor at raising donations direct from individual citizens and supporters that if they were to get in power their Prime Minister could never go anywhere, unless it could be done with a bus ticket!

"A government which robs Peter to pay Paul can always depend on the support of Paul."

-- George Bernard Shaw

"There is no point in being difficult when, with a little extra effort, you can be completely impossible."

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      11,021
    • Most Online
      2,945

    Newest Member
    Smith29
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...