Posc Student Posted May 10, 2011 Report Posted May 10, 2011 Not bad in fact I think this is more realistic then the one I tried to put together. There was a few I was unsure about, I wasn't sure who to put in Immigration. As well John Williamson is someone who I think needs to be added. Quote
bloodyminded Posted May 11, 2011 Report Posted May 11, 2011 (edited) Nobody cares anyway, outside the national liberal press elites and the socialists in opposition. Mom and dad in the suburbs could not possibly care less, and it was going on long, hysterical rants over crap like this which got the Liberals so little public support. So...the "liberal" press who are concerned about Canadian complicity in torture are "hysterical...elites," but those who defend or support such practices are...not "elites"? Edited May 11, 2011 by bloodyminded Quote As scarce as truth is, the supply has always been in excess of the demand. --Josh Billings
Jack Weber Posted May 11, 2011 Report Posted May 11, 2011 So...the "liberal" press who are concerned about Canadian complicity in torture are "hysterical...elites," but those who defend or supprot such practices are...not "elites"? I believe he's trying to say that the "Don Cherryesque" masses ie. common everyday folk are not interested in the Conservative's attempts at subverting the democratic process in this country??? Quote The beatings will continue until morale improves!!!
bloodyminded Posted May 11, 2011 Report Posted May 11, 2011 (edited) I believe he's trying to say that the "Don Cherryesque" masses ie. common everyday folk are not interested in the Conservative's attempts at subverting the democratic process in this country??? Ah, the common everyday folk like the multimillionaire celebrity. Very distinct from the "elites." Edited May 11, 2011 by bloodyminded Quote As scarce as truth is, the supply has always been in excess of the demand. --Josh Billings
Jack Weber Posted May 11, 2011 Report Posted May 11, 2011 Ah, the common everyday folk like the multimillionaire celebrity. Very distinct from the "elites." Yeah...Ya'know...The one who calls anyone NOT a hardline Tory a "pinko"... Quote The beatings will continue until morale improves!!!
bloodyminded Posted May 11, 2011 Report Posted May 11, 2011 Yeah...Ya'know...The one who calls anyone NOT a hardline Tory a "pinko"... Apparently "elite" is shorthand for "not Conservative-affiliated," and carries no other meaning. Now that's beautifully convenient! Quote As scarce as truth is, the supply has always been in excess of the demand. --Josh Billings
Uncle 3 dogs Posted May 15, 2011 Report Posted May 15, 2011 (edited) My spellchecker says it is Inuit. I meant what in non-PC days we called Eskimos. your spellchecker is right, but Innu are an Algonkian First Nation, not the same as Inuit. Edited May 15, 2011 by Uncle 3 dogs Quote
Posc Student Posted May 17, 2011 Report Posted May 17, 2011 MacLeans, which I guess is Andrew Coyne, is suggesting slashing the size of Cabinet, here are his thoughts. •Prime Minister •Justice/ Attorney General •Public Safety/Solicitor General •Defence (inc Veterans) •Foreign Affairs & Trade •Intergovernmental Affairs •Aboriginal Affairs •Immigration •Finance (inc. Revenue, Treasury Board, Financial Services) •Industry •Resources (inc. Energy, Mining, Forestry, Fisheries, Agriculture) •Infrastructure (inc Transportation, Telecoms, Public Works) •Environment & Public Health •Work & Incomes (inc Labour, Training, Unemployment Insurance, Income Assistance, Pensions) There’s also: •Government House Leader •Senate Leader I agree alot with what he's saying, there's no Health Minister for whatever reason, here is the article he wrote which is quite interestin. He compares the size of our Cabinet with others and it's amazing how big ours is. Taking his list here are my thoughts; •Prime Minister - Stephen Harper •Justice/ Attorney General - Rob Nicholson •Public Safety/Solicitor General - Vic Toews •Defence (inc Veterans) - Peter MacKay •Foreign Affairs & Trade - Chris Alexander •Intergovernmental Affairs - Rona Ambrose •Aboriginal Affairs - Leona Aglukkaq •Immigration - Jason Kenney •Finance (inc. Revenue, Treasury Board, Financial Services) - Jim Flaherty •Industry - Tony Clement •Resources (inc. Energy, Mining, Forestry, Fisheries, Agriculture) - Christian Paradis •Infrastructure (inc Transportation, Telecoms, Public Works) - James Moore •Environment & Public Health - John Baird •Work & Incomes (inc Labour, Training, Unemployment Insurance, Income Assistance, Pensions) - Diane Finley There’s also: •Government House Leader - Peter Kent or Diane Ablonczy •Senate Leader - Marjory LeBreton Quote
Shakeyhands Posted May 17, 2011 Report Posted May 17, 2011 I believe he's trying to say that the "Don Cherryesque" masses ie. common everyday folk are not interested in the Conservative's attempts at subverting the democratic process in this country??? Weird...... Jack is psychic!!! Quote "They muddy the water, to make it seem deep." - Friedrich Nietzsche
Smallc Posted May 17, 2011 Report Posted May 17, 2011 (edited) Health is needed, and Treasury Board needs to be kept separate, as the Finance Minister is the Vice President of the Treasury Board. I'd say that about 24 ministers is more realistic. Edited May 17, 2011 by Smallc Quote
Guest Derek L Posted May 17, 2011 Report Posted May 17, 2011 MacLeans, which I guess is Andrew Coyne, is suggesting slashing the size of Cabinet, here are his thoughts. I agree alot with what he's saying, there's no Health Minister for whatever reason, here is the article he wrote which is quite interestin. He compares the size of our Cabinet with others and it's amazing how big ours is. Taking his list here are my thoughts; •Prime Minister - Stephen Harper •Justice/ Attorney General - Rob Nicholson •Public Safety/Solicitor General - Vic Toews •Defence (inc Veterans) - Peter MacKay •Foreign Affairs & Trade - Chris Alexander•Intergovernmental Affairs - Rona Ambrose •Aboriginal Affairs - Leona Aglukkaq •Immigration - Jason Kenney •Finance (inc. Revenue, Treasury Board, Financial Services) - Jim Flaherty •Industry - Tony Clement •Resources (inc. Energy, Mining, Forestry, Fisheries, Agriculture) - Christian Paradis •Infrastructure (inc Transportation, Telecoms, Public Works) - James Moore •Environment & Public Health - John Baird •Work & Incomes (inc Labour, Training, Unemployment Insurance, Income Assistance, Pensions) - Diane Finley There’s also: •Government House Leader - Peter Kent or Diane Ablonczy •Senate Leader - Marjory LeBreton You like Chris Alexander too Quote
Posc Student Posted May 17, 2011 Report Posted May 17, 2011 You like Chris Alexander too I just think he's the one with the experience to do the job. I doubt he'll get it but there's probably no one else within the party with his qualifications, Martha Hall Findlay has also said he she be Minister of Foreign Affairs. Quote
Guest Derek L Posted May 18, 2011 Report Posted May 18, 2011 I just think he's the one with the experience to do the job. I doubt he'll get it but there's probably no one else within the party with his qualifications, Martha Hall Findlay has also said he she be Minister of Foreign Affairs. I agree 100%, I picked him earlier in the thread Quote
Posc Student Posted May 18, 2011 Report Posted May 18, 2011 John Baird's going to Foreign Affairs! Quote
Smallc Posted May 18, 2011 Report Posted May 18, 2011 I thought they'd shrink the Cabinet, but, apparently not. I was thinking it might go from 38 ministers to 30 - 32. Quote
Smallc Posted May 18, 2011 Report Posted May 18, 2011 On Twitter, Robert Fife says that Christian Paradis may go to Industry, and Tony Clement to Treasury Board. Quote
Guest Derek L Posted May 18, 2011 Report Posted May 18, 2011 John Baird's going to Foreign Affairs! WOW......not sure how I feel about that I just read the CTV piece, and they're saying Mad Max might be brought back into the fold..... Quote
Posc Student Posted May 18, 2011 Report Posted May 18, 2011 Time to reduce Cabinet, should be under 20. Quote
Smallc Posted May 18, 2011 Report Posted May 18, 2011 Time to reduce Cabinet, should be under 20. I don't really see that as a possibility. There are many different directions that the government has to go, all at once. That's far too time demanding. People talk about the small US cabinet, but, their cabinet doesn't include some of the same people that ours does (under secretaries aren't included, where as ministers of state and secretaries of state are). Quote
Posc Student Posted May 18, 2011 Report Posted May 18, 2011 I don't really see that as a possibility. There are many different directions that the government has to go, all at once. That's far too time demanding. People talk about the small US cabinet, but, their cabinet doesn't include some of the same people that ours does (under secretaries aren't included, where as ministers of state and secretaries of state are). Read Andrew Coyne's article in Macleans, Britain has 23 and Australia, Germany, Japan, Frnace, and New Zealand all have 20 or less. We have the largest cabinet in the democratic world. http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/16/cut-it-in-half-and-no-one-would-notice/ Quote
Smallc Posted May 18, 2011 Report Posted May 18, 2011 (edited) Read Andrew Coyne's article in Macleans, Britain has 23 and Australia, Germany, Japan, Frnace, and New Zealand all have 20 or less. Good for them. We aren't them. I can see some of the duplication disappearing, but there are many regional and focus considerations. Things like finance and treasury board can't be combined. Things like Foreign Affairs and International Trade are better apart. Do we need a CIDA minister? Probably not. A seniors minister? Probably not? There are about 10 easy cuts from the cabinet. Cutting more than 14 ministers would be nearly impossible. Really, we only have 27 ministers though, The Ministers of State are positions to ease people in and out o cabinet, not a bad thing. Edited May 18, 2011 by Smallc Quote
Smallc Posted May 18, 2011 Report Posted May 18, 2011 There's also the fact that most of those countries have government that is utterly incompetent in comparison to what Canada has had for the last two decades. Maybe their cabinet has too much on it's plate? Quote
Topaz Posted May 18, 2011 Report Posted May 18, 2011 John Baird, the court jester is going to Foreign Affairs. Hopefully, he'll be gone more from QP than there. http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/politics/john-baird-to-be-new-foreign-affairs-minister/article2025881/ Quote
Posc Student Posted May 18, 2011 Report Posted May 18, 2011 Peter Penashue becomes the first Innu ever sworn into cabinet as the Minister of Intergovernmental Affairs and President of the Queen’s Privy Council for Canada! Quote
Smallc Posted May 18, 2011 Report Posted May 18, 2011 (edited) And the cabinet is now tied for the biggest ever. I'm actually surprised. We have two National Defence Ministers now....I think that speaks to something that will be happening. More for the military, and I'm not complaining. Edited May 18, 2011 by Smallc Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.