Jump to content

2014 Healthcare Apocalypse


Recommended Posts

So the Harper majority is going to have to deal with the Healthcare apocalypse that is going to come in 2014.

I can see this easily going very, very badly for them... especially since their opposition is the party that founded universal healthcare in Canada.

Let's start a discussion on this. How do you see it playing out?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 72
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

So the Harper majority is going to have to deal with the Healthcare apocalypse that is going to come in 2014.

I can see this easily going very, very badly for them... especially since their opposition is the party that founded universal healthcare in Canada.

Let's start a discussion on this. How do you see it playing out?

The same way health care always does. It's always right next door to disaster.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here's how I see it:

This is going to be the penultimate moment for the Harper majority.

If they don't take steps towards privatization, they'll alienate the right wing in their party who may threaten to split.

If they do take steps towards privatization, they'll alienate the centre that voted for them and shove them off to the NDP.

It's a lose/lose situation for Harper.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pointless to discuss. Say you are making any change to our healthcare and about 80% of the people cry PRIVATIZATION - TWO TIER - THE END OF THE WORLD AS WE KNOW IT.

Just like in the US when anyone mentions public healthcare and about 80% of the people cry SOCIALISM - DEATH PANELS - THE END OF THE WORLD AS WE KNOW IT.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is that the major complaint over our healthcare? What exactly is wrong with it??

We have an aging population and health care cost continue to rise. Health care is continuously eating into government spending each year and the revenue is not growing to sustain other vital programs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pointless to discuss. Say you are making any change to our healthcare and about 80% of the people cry PRIVATIZATION - TWO TIER - THE END OF THE WORLD AS WE KNOW IT.

Just like in the US when anyone mentions public healthcare and about 80% of the people cry SOCIALISM - DEATH PANELS - THE END OF THE WORLD AS WE KNOW IT.

No, it isn't pointless. The healthcare debacle in the United States was one of the main reasons why the democrats lost in 2010... and in Canada, the party in majority power now has a sizeable contingent that want to privatize the healthcare or parts of the healthcare system.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here's how I see it:

This is going to be the penultimate moment for the Harper majority.

If they don't take steps towards privatization, they'll alienate the right wing in their party who may threaten to split.

If they do take steps towards privatization, they'll alienate the centre that voted for them and shove them off to the NDP.

It's a lose/lose situation for Harper.

The CPC is for the Provinces being allowed to experiment on the delivery of care. In this country we already have quite a few private facilities but as long as you are able to gain access with your health card and not a credit card I don't think most Canadians will care.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The CPC is for the Provinces being allowed to experiment on the delivery of care. In this country we already have quite a few private facilities but as long as you are able to gain access with your health card and not a credit card I don't think most Canadians will care.

They sure care in Alberta since every time the prov government tried to implement some privately run but publicly funded clinics the unions would mobilize the non-thinkers into mass rebellion. The vindictive rhetoric becomes unbelievable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We have an aging population and health care cost continue to rise. Health care is continuously eating into government spending each year and the revenue is not growing to sustain other vital programs.

So what would each party likely do to remedy this?

Sorry if I ask too many questions, I like to learn.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They sure care in Alberta since every time the prov government tried to implement some privately run but publicly funded clinics the unions would mobilize the non-thinkers into mass rebellion. The vindictive rhetoric becomes unbelievable.

The Wildrose Alliance will be fun to watch when they get into government.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We need to control costs...unfortunately, no country has managed to do that, whether their system is public, private, or hybrid. There is no real solution right now. We just have to decide how we want to pay for the increases (out of pocket, through insurance premiums, or through taxes). Right now, with the advances in technology and the rise in drug prices, along with the aging population, there isn't much to be done. We can make things more efficient, we can open up more private delivery, but even if that saves some, it will be but a drop in the bucket.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We need to control costs...unfortunately, no country has managed to do that, whether their system is public, private, or hybrid. There is no real solution right now. We just have to decide how we want to pay for the increases (out of pocket, through insurance premiums, or through taxes). Right now, with the advances in technology and the rise in drug prices, along with the aging population, there isn't much to be done. We can make things more efficient, we can open up more private delivery, but even if that saves some, it will be but a drop in the bucket.

The solution is to try to keep our heads above water as best we can without utterly undermining health care until the Baby Boom is six feet under. The problem will begin sorting itself out in the next ten to twenty years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The solution is to try to keep our heads above water as best we can without utterly undermining health care until the Baby Boom is six feet under. The problem will begin sorting itself out in the next ten to twenty years.

I know. My point is that privatizing services or introducing a hybrid system is going to do nothing to control costs. It may lower government expenditures, but the same people are really going to be paying one way or another.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know. My point is that privatizing services or introducing a hybrid system is going to do nothing to control costs. It may lower government expenditures, but the same people are really going to be paying one way or another.

Stuff costs.

I remember getting my wisdom teeth pulled, it cost 500 bucks. Money was tight at that time and I was saving up for a new tv. Well I had to give up the tv because I didn't want a mouth full of pain.

Wealthy or more well off people are not going to stand in line for healthcare for themselves or loved ones. Instead of sending them to the states, why not set some up here and use the tax revenue generated to help out the public system. Might help with the doctor/nurses going to the states. Our healthcare system is like forcing millionaires to go to a soup kitchen (yes I know we have advanced healthcare, I'm talking about costs) and a poor person who needs that soup kitchen is going to have to wait his turn. I don't understand why it can work in the education system and not for healthcare.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Might help with the doctor/nurses going to the states.

We don't have a problem with that anymore. For a system to set up, you need doctors and nurses. Since we already have a shortage, and there is a shortage of health practitioners across the western world, where are these people going to come from?

Our healthcare system is like forcing millionaires to go to a soup kitchen (yes I know we have advanced healthcare, I'm talking about costs) and a poor person who needs that soup kitchen is going to have to wait his turn. I don't understand why it can work in the education system and not for healthcare.

I'm not opposed to private care in principle (well, I am, but I know some people are going to use it no matter what - it's like my policy on weed and prostitution), but I'm not at all convinced that setting such a system up will be good for the public system.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Stuff costs.

I remember getting my wisdom teeth pulled, it cost 500 bucks. Money was tight at that time and I was saving up for a new tv. Well I had to give up the tv because I didn't want a mouth full of pain.

Wealthy or more well off people are not going to stand in line for healthcare for themselves or loved ones. Instead of sending them to the states, why not set some up here and use the tax revenue generated to help out the public system. Might help with the doctor/nurses going to the states. Our healthcare system is like forcing millionaires to go to a soup kitchen (yes I know we have advanced healthcare, I'm talking about costs) and a poor person who needs that soup kitchen is going to have to wait his turn. I don't understand why it can work in the education system and not for healthcare.

I'm jealous. It cost me ~$2000 to get my wisdom teeth pulled.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Stuff costs.

I remember getting my wisdom teeth pulled, it cost 500 bucks. Money was tight at that time and I was saving up for a new tv. Well I had to give up the tv because I didn't want a mouth full of pain.

Wealthy or more well off people are not going to stand in line for healthcare for themselves or loved ones. Instead of sending them to the states, why not set some up here and use the tax revenue generated to help out the public system. Might help with the doctor/nurses going to the states. Our healthcare system is like forcing millionaires to go to a soup kitchen (yes I know we have advanced healthcare, I'm talking about costs) and a poor person who needs that soup kitchen is going to have to wait his turn. I don't understand why it can work in the education system and not for healthcare.

Because you get people terrified of common sense.

People think it is queue jumping...but really, if there are two parallel systems you have two different queues: one that's free and one that costs. Obviously those who can and want to pay for treatment NOW will, so now your line is shorter because people moved themselves out of it, what's the problem?

I think it's "misery loves company".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,723
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    DACHSHUND
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

    • babetteteets went up a rank
      Rookie
    • paradox34 went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • paradox34 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • phoenyx75 earned a badge
      First Post
    • paradox34 earned a badge
      Dedicated
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...