Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

May not welcome in leaders' debates: networks

http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/canadavotes2011/story/2011/03/29/cv-may-greens-debates.html

Sounds good to me. 2008, we were assured was the Year of the Greens, and the support nationally she managed to muster was pitiful, and worse, in her arrogance and stupidity, Elizabeth May ran against a popular cabinet minister.

If we let the Greens into televised debates, then by all that's holy, I want to see the Marxist-Leninists let in, if for no other reason than the sheer entertainment value.

  • Replies 195
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

May should be allowed in the radio debates....

RIGHT of SOME, LEFT of OTHERS

If it is a choice between them and us, I choose us

Posted (edited)

May is a horrible party leader, but she should be in the debate. If a party consistently has support in the polls a bit less than 10%, i think they should have a voice at the table.

I don't know the use of the debates are anyways. It's just a bunch of liars spewing more of their bullcrap anyways. At least we can get that crap on record (even more!) i suppose. <_<

Edited by Moonlight Graham

"All generalizations are false, including this one." - Mark Twain

Partisanship is a disease of the intellect.

Posted

May not welcome in leaders' debates: networks

http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/canadavotes2011/story/2011/03/29/cv-may-greens-debates.html

If we let the Greens into televised debates, then by all that's holy, I want to see the Marxist-Leninists let in, if for no other reason than the sheer entertainment value.

I say we invite this guy to participate!

What about the rent?

"They muddy the water, to make it seem deep." - Friedrich Nietzsche

Posted

I just heard on the CBC that Elizabeth May is shocked.

I am shocked to hear that she is shocked!

I predicted she wouldn't be invited back.

I guess she has to put up a fuss to make it look good for her campaign contributors.

WWWTT

Maple Leaf Web is now worth $720.00! Down over $1,500 in less than one year! Total fail of the moderation on this site! That reminds me, never ask Greg to be a business partner! NEVER!

Posted
If we let the Greens into televised debates, then by all that's holy, I want to see the Marxist-Leninists let in, if for no other reason than the sheer entertainment value.

How about the Less Work Party? Or the Rhino Party?
  • Free speech: "You can say what you want, but I don't have to lend you my megaphone."
  • Always remember that when you are in the right you can afford to keep your temper, and when you are in the wrong you cannot afford to lose it. - J.J. Reynolds.
  • Will the steps anyone is proposing to fight "climate change" reduce a single temperature, by a single degree, at a single location?
  • The mantra of "world opinion" or the views of the "international community" betrays flabby and weak reasoning (link).

Posted

She was a colossal waste of time at the last leadership debate.

I think that supporters of all the major parties should be pleased. It'll give the real leaders more time to make their case and to challenge each other.

Kudos to the networks for putting their foot down. Enough's enough, Liz.

-k

(╯°□°)╯︵ ┻━┻ Friendly forum facilitator! ┬──┬◡ノ(° -°ノ)

Posted

Good stuff. I wasn't looking forward to staring at that humongous grin of hers for two hours, on display even when she was making a serious point. That's another thing, had enough in 08 of her pointy fingers in everybody's face. I'd also like a return to the podium style. That kitchen table setup is fine for NDP get togethers.

In addition, all four parties have formed a united front and made it clear they will let the consortium determine the rules of the debate, including who is invited and who isn’t.

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/politics/elizabeth-may-excluded-from-election-debates/article1962085/

"We always want the best man to win an election. Unfortunately, he never runs." Will Rogers

Posted

You got an MP you get in the debates, you don't you don't. It seems simple to me this is how it went last time.

No it didn't go that way punked. May was allowed in the 08 debates.

"We always want the best man to win an election. Unfortunately, he never runs." Will Rogers

Posted

Because she had an MP Blair Wilson. That was her argument then remember?

May is MPless was and still is...

RIGHT of SOME, LEFT of OTHERS

If it is a choice between them and us, I choose us

Posted

May is MPless was and still is...

No she had an MP his name was Blair Wilson you clearly need to read up on this subject because you are dead wrong. That was her whole argument last time.

Posted (edited)

Because she had an MP Blair Wilson. That was her argument then remember?

Yes, forgot about Wilson. He was not elected as a Green MP though, he went from Liberal to Independent to Green. And even then just for a few months. Oh well, at dissolution the Greens had no elected MP so Mae should be excluded.

Edited by capricorn

"We always want the best man to win an election. Unfortunately, he never runs." Will Rogers

Posted

Yes, forgot about Wilson. He was not elected though, he went from Liberal to Independent to Green. And even then just for a few months. Oh well, at dissolution the Greens had no elected MP so Mae should be excluded.

I agree that is my point, that was her trump card last election.

Posted

I agree that is my point, that was her trump card last election.

According to Twitter, both The Liberals and the NDP think that the Greens should be in the debate....morons.

Posted

According to Twitter, both The Liberals and the NDP think that the Greens should be in the debate....morons.

From the office statement the NDP's positions is this "Regarding the leaders' debates, it is up to the consortium to decide the venue, format and participants,”.

Posted

From the office statement the NDP's positions is this "Regarding the leaders' debates, it is up to the consortium to decide the venue, format and participants,”.

The Twitterverse keeps saying differently, that Jack thinks that May should be in the debates.

Posted

The Twitterverse keeps saying differently, that Jack thinks that May should be in the debates.

I can only speak about what the party puts out. Jack may have personal opinions but the NDP is saying whatever rules the broadcasters say go.

Posted

The Twitterverse keeps saying differently, that Jack thinks that May should be in the debates.

I can only speak about what the party puts out. Jack may have personal opinions but the NDP is saying whatever rules the broadcasters say go.

Does anyone have a copy of an actual Jack Layton tweet on the subject?

  • Free speech: "You can say what you want, but I don't have to lend you my megaphone."
  • Always remember that when you are in the right you can afford to keep your temper, and when you are in the wrong you cannot afford to lose it. - J.J. Reynolds.
  • Will the steps anyone is proposing to fight "climate change" reduce a single temperature, by a single degree, at a single location?
  • The mantra of "world opinion" or the views of the "international community" betrays flabby and weak reasoning (link).

Posted

Kady O'Malley was one of the people reporting it:

http://twitter.com/#!/kady

kady seems to have a vivid sense of speculation.

  • Free speech: "You can say what you want, but I don't have to lend you my megaphone."
  • Always remember that when you are in the right you can afford to keep your temper, and when you are in the wrong you cannot afford to lose it. - J.J. Reynolds.
  • Will the steps anyone is proposing to fight "climate change" reduce a single temperature, by a single degree, at a single location?
  • The mantra of "world opinion" or the views of the "international community" betrays flabby and weak reasoning (link).

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,917
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    juliewar3214
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

    • LinkSoul60 earned a badge
      First Post
    • Раймо earned a badge
      First Post
    • Раймо earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • MDP went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • MDP earned a badge
      Collaborator
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...