Michael Hardner Posted October 13, 2010 Report Posted October 13, 2010 Yes, immigrants both produce and consume. So what? What's important is the ratio. If one immigrant produces and 100 consume is that as positive as the other way around? Clearly not. But your explanation assumed no production, from what I read of it. And your new example of 1 immigrant producing for 100 consuming is equally wrong. As for RIM, I've seen the production lines myself and sold them parts to go into their products. Don't bother demanding a cite. I've touched them! That's enough proof for me. Do they manufacture anything offshore though ? GNP/GDP was indeed my error. Doesn't change my point, though. Both acronyms end in PRODUCT and not just JOBS! Ok. But more people working in Canada means GDP goes up. As for trade agreements and turning back the clock, I have nothing against Free Trade agreements for Canada. When are we going to get some? The ones so far all have seemed to be rigged deals where our negotiators got "snookered". Mulroney killed much of our manufacturing in favour of import warehouses, where the terms were not equally favourable for a Canadian country to do the same down South. Chretien and his gang gave all the Northern Telecom manufacturing to China, for intangible political gains and for large sums of money that no longer were used for Canadian payrolls. As for being a Conservative, I've stated many times that I am not! Folks like you keep insisting on calling me one. I guess the modern definition of a Conservative is someone who doesn't agree with everything that's modern liberal. Ok, I thought you were a Conservative. My error. Once again, for lack of a better definition, I'm more of a Libertarian with a streak of rational anarchist. Although I differ in some areas, I can get along with a Randite. (Thanks to Bob Heinlein for educating me!) Well a Libertarian would also agree with completely Free Trade, wouldn't he ? You're like some I've read on here - they don't want the government involved in anything, but they still want them to protect our jobs from the so-called Asian horde. I don't think Harper is your man, better vote for Layton he sounds like a better match. Quote Click to learn why Climate Change is caused by HUMANS Michael Hardner
Wild Bill Posted October 13, 2010 Report Posted October 13, 2010 (edited) Well a Libertarian would also agree with completely Free Trade, wouldn't he ? You're like some I've read on here - they don't want the government involved in anything, but they still want them to protect our jobs from the so-called Asian horde. I don't think Harper is your man, better vote for Layton he sounds like a better match. As for protecting our jobs, that's one of the functions of government. I don't respect government doing a job that could be done by private enterprise. However, relationships with other countries are not a job for privatization. I EXPECT government to handle defense, diplomacy and trade relationships! Suggesting that being pro privatization means government should do NOTHING is just silly! Why, if that were the case why should we pay taxes? I would agree with completely FAIR trade! That's the problem. As I had said, we haven't had any such agreements as yet. It always seems like we get an unfair deal, especially when Chretien used to trade away jobs for status at the UN. When we put "green" costs on our steel or ban pesticides that increase crop yields yet let other countries with no such extra costs cheerful access to our domestic market that's NOT fair trade! When we allow countries to fill our WalMarts while they keep our stuff out of theirs, that's NOT fair trade! When we allow American truckers to operate in Canada who can depreciate their capital costs of having the truck far faster and to a greater degree than our boys, is it any wonder that our guy are less competitive at contracts WITHIN Canada? Again, that's NOT fair trade! Don't get me started on softwood lumber! Why on earth would Layton be a better match for me? He and his people have always looked at business like a vampire at a fat lady with high blood pressure! Edited October 13, 2010 by Wild Bill Quote "A government which robs Peter to pay Paul can always depend on the support of Paul." -- George Bernard Shaw "There is no point in being difficult when, with a little extra effort, you can be completely impossible."
Michael Hardner Posted October 13, 2010 Report Posted October 13, 2010 As for protecting our jobs, that's one of the functions of government. I don't respect government doing a job that could be done by private enterprise. However, relationships with other countries are not a job for privatization. I EXPECT government to handle defense, diplomacy and trade relationships! Suggesting that being pro privatization means government should do NOTHING is just silly! No, protecting jobs isn't a function of government. Should it be ? Don't get me started on softwood lumber! Why on earth would Layton be a better match for me? He and his people have always looked at business like a vampire at a fat lady with high blood pressure! Why Layton ? He's likely the most protectionist of the leaders, maybe excepting Duceppe. He will protect your union job, worry not. Quote Click to learn why Climate Change is caused by HUMANS Michael Hardner
Saipan Posted October 13, 2010 Report Posted October 13, 2010 Well Tonto just called. He wants his country back. Sorry hombre, his pistolas are too small. Quote
CANADIEN Posted October 13, 2010 Report Posted October 13, 2010 So you don't have a problem with drastically reducing non-white immigration to white countries? I have enough common sense not to care about the color's of one skin. But not to worry... there are some people who think like you. The government brings in 250,000 immigrants a year regardless of economic conditions, and more than 80% is non-white. Canada has about 130,000 births over deaths each year, about half the level of immigration, and white births are among the lowest in the country. On top of that, miscegenation is encouraged. Globally, white people make up less than 10% of the population and their countries are being flooded with non-white immigration because to refuse it is considered racist. Black countries for blacks. Asian countries for Asians. Muslim countries for Muslims. Israel for Jews. Mexico for Mexicans. White countries for everyone. Anti-racist is code for anti-white. You claim there is a genocide program against Whites. Feel free to offer PROOF - I am sure it will be very entertaining. Quote
justme Posted October 14, 2010 Report Posted October 14, 2010 Well Tonto just called. He wants his country back. 1) There is evidence to suggest that Europeans were in North America many thousands of years ago. 2) History does not mean that the country should be voluntarily given away. 3) But regardless of who was here first, squatting on a piece of land doesn't mean that you have a country. Indians may have lived off the land, but did they have infrastruture, an economy, legal system, education system, health care system, etc? Nope. 4) People want to move to this country because they want a piece of what white people built. They are not coming here to live in teepees nor to hunt for sustenance. 5) Even if white people moved to Europe, it wouldn't matter because European countries are being flooded with non-white immigration, too. Black countries for blacks. Asian countries for Asians. Muslim countries for Muslims. Israel for Jews. Mexico for Mexicans. White countries for everyone. Quote “The one absolutely certain way of bringing this nation to ruin, of preventing all possibility of its continuing to be a nation at all, would be to permit it to become a tangle of squabbling nationalities.” –Theodore Roosevelt “The symptoms of dying civilizations are well known. The death of faith; the degeneration of morals; contempt for the old values; collapse of the culture; paralysis of the will, but the two certain symptoms that a civilization has begun to die are a declining population and foreign invasions no longer resisted.” – Patrick J. Buchanan "Liberalism is the ideology of Western suicide. Its ideas pursued to their logical end will prove fatal to the West." -- James Burnham
Shwa Posted October 14, 2010 Report Posted October 14, 2010 (edited) 1) There is evidence to suggest that Europeans were in North America many thousands of years ago. There is evidence that aliens made the Nazca Lines many more thousands of years ago. Aliens are grey. Do they count as off-white? No? Drats. 2) History does not mean that the country should be voluntarily given away. Then sauce for the goose... 3) But regardless of who was here first, squatting on a piece of land doesn't mean that you have a country. Indians may have lived off the land, but did they have infrastruture, an economy, legal system, education system, health care system, etc? Nope. Yep. they had an infrastructure, an economy, a legal system, a health care system, etc. Or are you that ignorant? 4) People want to move to this country because they want a piece of what white people built. They are not coming here to live in teepees nor to hunt for sustenance. But people wanted to move to this country because of what the Indians built. Or did you miss those years of Canadian history? 5) Even if white people moved to Europe, it wouldn't matter because European countries are being flooded with non-white immigration, too. And lets not forget all those white women copulating with Blacks, Asians, Muslims, Jews, Mexicans and Indians and making all those brown babies. And let's not forget all those white men copulating with non-white women too. Pretty soon everyone will be more or less the same colour - doesn't that please you? Eventually everyone will have a nice tanned look so colour will be a thing of the past. At the expense of tanning salons mind you, but something will have to give. White countries for everyone. Agreed. Edited October 14, 2010 by Shwa Quote
Jack Weber Posted October 14, 2010 Report Posted October 14, 2010 Black countries for blacks. Asian countries for Asians. Muslim countries for Muslims. Israel for Jews. Mexico for Mexicans. White countries for everyone. Did you read this on a T-shirt or a shithouse wall??? I'm going with shithouse wall.... Quote The beatings will continue until morale improves!!!
justme Posted October 14, 2010 Report Posted October 14, 2010 I have enough common sense not to care about the color's of one skin. But not to worry... there are some people who think like you. So you wouldn't mind policy that would bring about the decline of other racial/ethnic groups in their countries? You claim there is a genocide program against Whites. Feel free to offer PROOF - I am sure it will be very entertaining. Genocide comes from the Greek word "genos" meaning race. Genocide means, "the deliberate and systematic destruction of a racial, political, or cultural group." Genocide is defined by the U.N. Genocide Conventional of 1948 as, "…conditions of life calculated to bring about the physical destruction in whole or in part." You do not have to kill people to do that. What would you call a deliberate attempt to change white countries, and ONLY white countries, by flooding them with non-white immigration to the point that they will become a minority in just a couple generations? Notice that there is no attempt to come up with policies that may help raise the birth rate? The government only turns to immigration, and wants ever higher and continuous levels of immigration regardless of economic conditions. Their goal is 1% of the population in immigration per year, which would be like compound interest as the population increases, and the arguments made to justify it do not hold water. More than 80% of this immigration is non-white. I repeat, notice how they don't even try to raise the birth rate? Meanwhile, Canadian births over deaths stand at about 130,000 per year - according to Statistics Canada - and white births are among the lowest. If the non-white population is growing at about twice the rate of the white population, and they want to accerate that, it's not a matter of if but when white people will be reduced to a minority, and there is no way such a policy could be carried out without the people responsible for it knowing what the consequences would be. Miscegenation destroys the white gene pool and further reduces the population. Through multiculturalism, white culture is already reduced to being but one piece of a collage of other cultures, and as the population declines, that piece shrinks. Finally, this isn't just happening in Canada, but in other white countries - and ONLY white countries. "Our cities will not be flooded with a million immigrants annually. Under the purposed Bill, the present level of immigration remains substantially the same. Secondly, the ethnic mix of this country will not be upset. Contrary to the charges in some quarters, S500 will not inundate America with immigrants from any other country or area, or the most populated and economically deprived nations of Asia and Africa. Only haters would make such assertions." -- Senator Edward Kennedy (Chairman of the Subcommittee that conducted the hearing on the 1965 Immigration Bill) "Today, largely because of immigration, there is no majority race in Hawaii or Houston or New York City. Within five years, there will be no majority race in our largest state, California. In a little more than 50 years, there will be no majority race in the United States. No other nation in history has gone through demographic change of this magnitude in so short a time ..." -- President Bill Clinton (1998) Bit of a contradiction there wouldn't you say? The US Constitution defines America, and what does the preamble say? "... and secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America." Given that every one of the founding fathers was white, I don't think that they were talking about a multicultural rainbow when they wrote, "our posterity." America also has millions of Mexicans entering the country illegally, which the government does little to stop. And Mexicans have what's called "La Raza," which literally means, "the race." But race doesn't matter, right? And what is the reason given for allowing them into the country? To do jobs that Americans supposedly won't do while the remaining jobs that aren't outsourced to non-white countries or taken by illegals are often subject to "affirmative action" policy, which discriminates against white people and is also applied to higher education. But... Black countries for blacks. Asian countries for Asians. Muslim countries for Muslims. Israel for Jews. Mexico for Mexicans. White countries for everyone. Quote “The one absolutely certain way of bringing this nation to ruin, of preventing all possibility of its continuing to be a nation at all, would be to permit it to become a tangle of squabbling nationalities.” –Theodore Roosevelt “The symptoms of dying civilizations are well known. The death of faith; the degeneration of morals; contempt for the old values; collapse of the culture; paralysis of the will, but the two certain symptoms that a civilization has begun to die are a declining population and foreign invasions no longer resisted.” – Patrick J. Buchanan "Liberalism is the ideology of Western suicide. Its ideas pursued to their logical end will prove fatal to the West." -- James Burnham
justme Posted October 14, 2010 Report Posted October 14, 2010 (edited) There is evidence that aliens made the Nazca Lines many more thousands of years ago. Aliens are grey. Do they count as off-white? No? Drats. AliensTheTruth.com or the BBC and DNA... Hmm... Yep. they had an infrastructure, an economy, a legal system, a health care system, etc. Or are you that ignorant?But people wanted to move to this country because of what the Indians built. Or did you miss those years of Canadian history? That explains why living conditions are so poor on reserves. And lets not forget all those white women copulating with Blacks, Asians, Muslims, Jews, Mexicans and Indians and making all those brown babies. And let's not forget all those white men copulating with non-white women too. Pretty soon everyone will be more or less the same colour - doesn't that please you? Eventually everyone will have a nice tanned look so colour will be a thing of the past. At the expense of tanning salons mind you, but something will have to give. But the policy is supposed to be about diversity, remember? And given that this is happening in white countries, and ONLY white countries, you are suggesting that it would be good to wipe white people out of existence? Other racial groups will still have large, and mostly homogeneous, populations in other countries. Black countries for blacks. Asian countries for Asians. Muslim countries for Muslims. Israel for Jews. Mexico for Mexicans. White countries for everyone. Edited October 14, 2010 by justme Quote “The one absolutely certain way of bringing this nation to ruin, of preventing all possibility of its continuing to be a nation at all, would be to permit it to become a tangle of squabbling nationalities.” –Theodore Roosevelt “The symptoms of dying civilizations are well known. The death of faith; the degeneration of morals; contempt for the old values; collapse of the culture; paralysis of the will, but the two certain symptoms that a civilization has begun to die are a declining population and foreign invasions no longer resisted.” – Patrick J. Buchanan "Liberalism is the ideology of Western suicide. Its ideas pursued to their logical end will prove fatal to the West." -- James Burnham
justme Posted October 14, 2010 Report Posted October 14, 2010 Did you read this on a T-shirt or a shithouse wall??? I'm going with shithouse wall.... Do you deny that it is the truth? Black countries for blacks. Asian countries for Asians. Muslim countries for Muslims. Israel for Jews. Mexico for Mexicans. White countries for everyone. Quote “The one absolutely certain way of bringing this nation to ruin, of preventing all possibility of its continuing to be a nation at all, would be to permit it to become a tangle of squabbling nationalities.” –Theodore Roosevelt “The symptoms of dying civilizations are well known. The death of faith; the degeneration of morals; contempt for the old values; collapse of the culture; paralysis of the will, but the two certain symptoms that a civilization has begun to die are a declining population and foreign invasions no longer resisted.” – Patrick J. Buchanan "Liberalism is the ideology of Western suicide. Its ideas pursued to their logical end will prove fatal to the West." -- James Burnham
Bonam Posted October 14, 2010 Report Posted October 14, 2010 (edited) Do you deny that it is the truth? Black countries for blacks. Asian countries for Asians. Muslim countries for Muslims. Israel for Jews. Mexico for Mexicans. White countries for everyone. Well, there is obviously some cause to be concerned for people of Western countries and the immigration trends that are happening right now. Considerable sentiment is building in many of these countries to reform immigration. That being said, one of the reasons immigration works this way right now is because of land area and how it is distributed among these countries really. Specifically, "white countries" (here I will assume that means mainly North America, Russia, Europe, and Australia) occupy about 40% of the world's land area, but hold only about 20% of the world's population. Conversely, the rest of the countries have 50% of the land area and 80% of the population (the other 10% of the area is Antarctica). Non-white countries, thus, on average, have over 3 times the population density of white countries. Simple law of diffusion, things travel from where they are dense and concentrated to where they are less dense and concentrated. Edited October 14, 2010 by Bonam Quote
CANADIEN Posted October 14, 2010 Report Posted October 14, 2010 So you wouldn't mind policy that would bring about the decline of other racial/ethnic groups in their countries? The fact that there is no policy aiming at the decline of any group in our country aside, what part of`"I don't care about a person`s skin colour" is too complicated for you to grasp? Genocide comes from the Greek word "genos" meaning race. Genocide means, "the deliberate and systematic destruction of a racial, political, or cultural group." Genocide is defined by the U.N. Genocide Conventional of 1948 as, "…conditions of life calculated to bring about the physical destruction in whole or in part." You do not have to kill people to do that. Thanks for PROVING right from the start that 1) there is no anti-white genocide 2) you don't know what you are talking about Quote
Shwa Posted October 14, 2010 Report Posted October 14, 2010 (edited) AliensTheTruth.com or the BBC and DNA... Hmm... Suspect theories based on circumstantial evidence used by white supremacist groups to claim North American ancestry. "Hmm..." Besides, the Solutreans were likely very brown, originating in North Africa and are not considered the ancestors of modern Europeans. Of course, this was all before anyone had even thought of the word "Europe." That explains why living conditions are so poor on reserves. No, it doesn't explain why living conditions are poor on some Indian reserves. Have you actually ever been to an Indian reserve or taken even a cursory look at pre-Columbian Indian cultures? No? You should. Then you wouldn't look like such a maroon on Internet forums such as this. But the policy is supposed to be about diversity, remember? And given that this is happening in white countries, and ONLY white countries, you are suggesting that it would be good to wipe white people out of existence? Other racial groups will still have large, and mostly homogeneous, populations in other countries. No, I am not suggesting anything of the kind, but nice try in attempting to place your nutbar delusions on me. You see I consider lots of healthy babies to be a good sign for the species so there is no 'wiping out' going on at all. Quite the opposite in fact. White countries for everyone. Agreed. Edited October 14, 2010 by Shwa Quote
Michael Hardner Posted October 14, 2010 Report Posted October 14, 2010 To summarize positions on reform on this thread, so far we have these positions, summarized in too few words: justme - believes in racial segregation Wild Bill - supports trade protectionism Argus - submitted Fraser report on immigration & growth for discussion Quote Click to learn why Climate Change is caused by HUMANS Michael Hardner
justme Posted October 15, 2010 Report Posted October 15, 2010 That being said, one of the reasons immigration works this way right now is because of land area and how it is distributed among these countries really. Specifically, "white countries" (here I will assume that means mainly North America, Russia, Europe, and Australia) occupy about 40% of the world's land area, but hold only about 20% of the world's population. Conversely, the rest of the countries have 50% of the land area and 80% of the population (the other 10% of the area is Antarctica). Non-white countries, thus, on average, have over 3 times the population density of white countries. Simple law of diffusion, things travel from where they are dense and concentrated to where they are less dense and concentrated. So if you work hard and buy a nice big house with plenty of space and only have a couple of children but invest in their future, and your neighbour is irresponsible and has a large family in a shack while on welfare, does that mean they should all live in your house? The first world approach to mortality rates is to invest heavily into ways to increase life expectancy. The third world approach is to have tons of kids and hope that some of them survive. As a result, the third world population is exploding and they don't have the means to support it. Third world population is not our responsibility and we cannot solve it through immigration. Every year, the third world adds about 80 million people - roughly a population the size of Germany. In other words, we could triple our population and create total chaos in our country and still not even stop the growth in the third world for one year. Also, non-white countries have some of the best real estate in the world. Sure, Russia and Canada have the largest land masses, but most of the area is also very cold. The Netherlands and Belgium are more crowded than Japan or Taiwan, but nobody says Japan or Taiwan will solve the problem by bringing in millions of third worlders and "assimilating" with them. Quote “The one absolutely certain way of bringing this nation to ruin, of preventing all possibility of its continuing to be a nation at all, would be to permit it to become a tangle of squabbling nationalities.” –Theodore Roosevelt “The symptoms of dying civilizations are well known. The death of faith; the degeneration of morals; contempt for the old values; collapse of the culture; paralysis of the will, but the two certain symptoms that a civilization has begun to die are a declining population and foreign invasions no longer resisted.” – Patrick J. Buchanan "Liberalism is the ideology of Western suicide. Its ideas pursued to their logical end will prove fatal to the West." -- James Burnham
justme Posted October 15, 2010 Report Posted October 15, 2010 (edited) The fact that there is no policy aiming at the decline of any group in our country aside, what part of`"I don't care about a person`s skin colour" is too complicated for you to grasp? Increasing the non-white population at more than three times the rate of the white population - regardless of economic conditions - and advocating that everyone blend together IS policy aimed at the decline of the white population. Nobody is saying that we should flood Africa with non-blacks and blend everyone together. Nobody is saying that we should flood Asian countries with non-Asians and blend everyone together. The policy is being carried out in white countries, and ONLY white countries. It's genocide. Thanks for PROVING right from the start that 1) there is no anti-white genocide 2) you don't know what you are talking about Thanks for PROVING that you are in denial of the obvious: Black countries for blacks. Asian countries for Asians. Muslim countries for Muslims. Israel for Jews. Mexico for Mexicans. White countries for everyone. Edited October 15, 2010 by justme Quote “The one absolutely certain way of bringing this nation to ruin, of preventing all possibility of its continuing to be a nation at all, would be to permit it to become a tangle of squabbling nationalities.” –Theodore Roosevelt “The symptoms of dying civilizations are well known. The death of faith; the degeneration of morals; contempt for the old values; collapse of the culture; paralysis of the will, but the two certain symptoms that a civilization has begun to die are a declining population and foreign invasions no longer resisted.” – Patrick J. Buchanan "Liberalism is the ideology of Western suicide. Its ideas pursued to their logical end will prove fatal to the West." -- James Burnham
justme Posted October 15, 2010 Report Posted October 15, 2010 (edited) Suspect theories based on circumstantial evidence used by white supremacist groups to claim North American ancestry. "Hmm..." The BBC is circumstantial evidence for white supremacists? Advocating that white people should have what other racial/ethnic groups have is not supremacy; it is equality. But instead, we have: Black countries for blacks. Asian countries for Asians. Muslim countries for Muslims. Israel for Jews. Mexico for Mexicans. White countries for everyone. No, it doesn't explain why living conditions are poor on some Indian reserves. Yes it does. If they're in charge on reserves, THEY are responsible for success or failure. And while we're on the subject of indians, you won't see a chief trying to replace his people with foreigners and making his tribe multicultural. He might lose his scalp if he did that! No, I am not suggesting anything of the kind, but nice try in attempting to place your nutbar delusions on me. You see I consider lots of healthy babies to be a good sign for the species so there is no 'wiping out' going on at all. Quite the opposite in fact. Your own words: "Pretty soon everyone will be more or less the same colour - doesn't that please you?" That would mean the destruction of the white population of a white country, which would be genocidal. I'm not placing anything on you. Those are your words not mine. Edited October 15, 2010 by justme Quote “The one absolutely certain way of bringing this nation to ruin, of preventing all possibility of its continuing to be a nation at all, would be to permit it to become a tangle of squabbling nationalities.” –Theodore Roosevelt “The symptoms of dying civilizations are well known. The death of faith; the degeneration of morals; contempt for the old values; collapse of the culture; paralysis of the will, but the two certain symptoms that a civilization has begun to die are a declining population and foreign invasions no longer resisted.” – Patrick J. Buchanan "Liberalism is the ideology of Western suicide. Its ideas pursued to their logical end will prove fatal to the West." -- James Burnham
justme Posted October 15, 2010 Report Posted October 15, 2010 To summarize positions on reform on this thread, so far we have these positions, summarized in too few words: justme - believes in racial segregation Wild Bill - supports trade protectionism Argus - submitted Fraser report on immigration & growth for discussion I believe all people should have a place of their own - including white people. If it's ok for black and asian people, it's also ok for white people. That is equality, but instead, we have this double-standard: Black countries for blacks. Asian countries for Asians. Muslim countries for Muslims. Israel for Jews. Mexico for Mexicans. White countries for everyone. Quote “The one absolutely certain way of bringing this nation to ruin, of preventing all possibility of its continuing to be a nation at all, would be to permit it to become a tangle of squabbling nationalities.” –Theodore Roosevelt “The symptoms of dying civilizations are well known. The death of faith; the degeneration of morals; contempt for the old values; collapse of the culture; paralysis of the will, but the two certain symptoms that a civilization has begun to die are a declining population and foreign invasions no longer resisted.” – Patrick J. Buchanan "Liberalism is the ideology of Western suicide. Its ideas pursued to their logical end will prove fatal to the West." -- James Burnham
CANADIEN Posted October 15, 2010 Report Posted October 15, 2010 Increasing the non-white population at more than three times the rate of the white population - regardless of economic conditions - and advocating that everyone blend together IS policy aimed at the decline of the white population. In other words (YOUR words), genocide. Care to provide PROOF the intent is decline of the white population? Nobody is saying that we should flood Africa with non-blacks and blend everyone together. Nobody is saying that we should flood Asian countries with non-Asians and blend everyone together. More importantly, nobody (here at least) is saying it should not happen. The policy is being carried out in white countries, and ONLY white countries. It's genocide. Genocide implies intent. Feel free to try to prove your claim. Quote
CANADIEN Posted October 15, 2010 Report Posted October 15, 2010 Yes it does. If they're in charge on reserves, THEY are responsible for success or failure. They're in charge? That will be news for a lot of people, including themselves. And while we're on the subject of indians, you won't see a chief trying to replace his people with foreigners and making his tribe multicultural. He might lose his scalp if he did that! Your own words:"Pretty soon everyone will be more or less the same colour - doesn't that please you?" That would mean the destruction of the white population of a white country, which would be genocidal. I'm not placing anything on you. Those are your words not mine. You're baited, and you swallow, hook and all. Quote
CANADIEN Posted October 15, 2010 Report Posted October 15, 2010 So if you work hard and buy a nice big house with plenty of space and only have a couple of children but invest in their future, and your neighbour is irresponsible and has a large family in a shack while on welfare, does that mean they should all live in your house? Soo... whie-skinned couples having only a couple of children is proof of a (non-existant) genocide in one posting, and the wise thing to do in another. Make up your mind, will you? Quote
Shwa Posted October 15, 2010 Report Posted October 15, 2010 The BBC is circumstantial evidence for white supremacists? The theory was lightly reported on the BBC. The theory was also picked up by white supremecists as a rallying point for claims of North American ancestry. By using the word 'also' I am implying 'in addition to' or 'as well.' This indicates a complex or compound thought regarding a particular subject. If you can't keep up, I suggest you post in the CBC news story comments section until you have practiced English enough to get the nuances of the language. Or maybe take English as a Second Language (ESL) training. If you are in Toronto, you'll have no trouble finding ESL classes. Advocating that white people should have what other racial/ethnic groups have is not supremacy; it is equality. But instead, we have: White people can go anywhere they want so long as they behave. There are white people in Black countries, Asian countries, Muslim countries, Jewish countries and even in Mexico. I know for a fact that there are white people in Mexico. So all is equal after all. There, don't you feel better now? Yes it does. If they're in charge on reserves, THEY are responsible for success or failure.And while we're on the subject of indians, you won't see a chief trying to replace his people with foreigners and making his tribe multicultural. He might lose his scalp if he did that! I don't think you are as familiar or informed about Indians or Indian culture as you think you are. Did you know that Harry Smith aka'Jay Silverheels,' the guy who played Tonto in all those Lone Ranger serials, was a Mohawk lacrosse player from Six Nations before he got into acting? Cool eh? Your own words:"Pretty soon everyone will be more or less the same colour - doesn't that please you?" That would mean the destruction of the white population of a white country, which would be genocidal. I'm not placing anything on you. Those are your words not mine. There is no genocide going on here. Those are my words. And there is no "destruction" of any white population. My words again. Any mention of genocide towards, or destruction of "white country" is purely your own. And I think you are confused. My point is that when everyone is the same colour of brown, colour will more or less cease to be an issue, which would free your mind of what must constitute a considerable amount of stress. Then, once your mind is not so occupied with these stressful delusions, you could put it to more positive uses. Like learning English for example. Quote
Bryan Posted October 15, 2010 Report Posted October 15, 2010 If you disagree with globalized trade, then you aren't really a Conservative, as they brought these things to Canada in the 1980s. Did they use a time machine? Quote
Wild Bill Posted October 15, 2010 Report Posted October 15, 2010 I don't think you are as familiar or informed about Indians or Indian culture as you think you are. Did you know that Harry Smith aka'Jay Silverheels,' the guy who played Tonto in all those Lone Ranger serials, was a Mohawk lacrosse player from Six Nations before he got into acting? Cool eh? How about Robbie Robertson of The Band? Or Graham Greene, the respected actor who started out as a rock and roll roadie in the glory years of Crowbar and Ronnie Hawkins? Or that new kid, Derek Miller, who looks fabulous on stage and plays even better? Culture? More than that! People like these have contributed directly to our nation's soul! Quote "A government which robs Peter to pay Paul can always depend on the support of Paul." -- George Bernard Shaw "There is no point in being difficult when, with a little extra effort, you can be completely impossible."
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.