Jump to content

Charlton Heston wants long-gun registry scrapped...


Radsickle

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 316
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Automatic gun was used in recent Canadian history only three time in crime. In all three cases by government employees using government registered guns. Should we outlaw automatic guns for government use?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That was my question. You forgot what claim you made?

Try not to write in morse code. If you want to state something, state is clearly

Your claims are irrelevant now? That was fast :)

If you think I made a claim about ammunition, I welcome your search to find it.

Seems all your posts are. You need to do your homework before you post.

You need to learn how debate works

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Try not to write in morse code. If you want to state something, state is clearly

I did. And with evidence. Firearm ownership has no bearing on homicide OR suicide rate.

If you think I made a claim about ammunition, I welcome your search to find it.

No need. I ask again:

1) What ammo you used for hunting?

2) Do you think military ammo is illegal?

3) Do you think expanding bullets are illegal?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I did. And with evidence. Firearm ownership has no bearing on homicide OR suicide rate.

Please re-post

No need. I ask again:

1) What ammo you used for hunting?

Irrelevant

2) Do you think military ammo is illegal?

Equally irrelevant

3) Do you think expanding bullets are illegal?

Have I said they were illegal in Canada? Unless I have, your questions are irrelevant.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is your claim

I'm still waiting for evidence that the hand gun ban has a correlation to crime in the UK...or is global warming the reason?

I did. And with evidence. Firearm ownership has no bearing on homicide OR suicide rate.

Your links makes no reference to your claim.

keep swinging

Edited by M.Dancer
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is your claim

Your links makes no reference to your claim.

OK, let make it one step at a time again. Can you see the homicide rate for Czech Republic, Canada, Jamaica and Mexico in the first link?

New World Homicide Rate

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_murder_rate

Now, can you see the gun laws in Czech Republic in the second link?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gun_politics_in_the_Czech_Republic

Link to comment
Share on other sites

OK, let make it one step at a time again. Can you see the homicide rate for Czech Republic, Canada, Jamaica and Mexico in the first link?

New World Homicide Rate

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_murder_rate

Now, can you see the gun laws in Czech Republic in the second link?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gun_politics_in_the_Czech_Republic

And neither show correlation between guns or murder. What's more, the murder rate does not show the method of murder. In short, your proofs are worthless.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And neither show correlation between guns or murder. What's more, the murder rate does not show the method of murder. In short, your proofs are worthless.

Whatever your "correlation" means it shows low homicide rate with very liberal gun laws - and vice versa. And that is all you need to know to realize guns have nothing to do with crime.

Now you can put your head back in the sand and feel warm and fuzzy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Whatever your "correlation" means it shows low homicide rate with very liberal gun laws - and vice versa.

It means that random data may have no bearing on your conclusions....for example linking guns to homicides when you inculde all homicides....stabbing have ne bearing or correlation to the data..on the otherhand, if you look a homicides committed with firearms...

Let me refresh....for you.

Murders with firearms per 100,000

Czech Republic 2.07

Canada .50292

Winner, Czech Republic

And that is all you need to know to realize guns have nothing to do with crime.

Really? How does that jibe with your other unsubstantiated claim?

REGISTERED handguns were confiscated from lawabiding citizen in the UK. Gun crime went up.

.

Either guns and crime are linked as you claim, or guns and crime are not linked, as you claim.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It means that random data may have no bearing on your conclusions....for example linking guns to homicides

Why any linking? Just facts. There's no link.

Either guns and crime are linked as you claim, or guns and crime are not linked, as you claim.

Take your pick. Are they linked or not?

Makes no difference to me. Same results. I.e. guns do not make people commit crimes. Else we have serious problems with cops and soldiers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"I came to Ottawa in November with the firm belief that the only people in

this country who should have guns are police officers and soldiers"

- - - - Alan Rock, "Taking Aim on Guns" Maclean's, April 25, 1994, pg.12

Alan Rock, Paul Martin, Dulton McGuinty, David Miller and other liberals are advocating police state.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Take your pick. Are they linked or not?

Makes no difference to me. Same results. I.e. guns do not make people commit crimes. Else we have serious problems with cops and soldiers.

Yes exactly, you have so much unused space in your brain you can have two conradictory thoughts at the same time.

Game set and match

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes exactly, you have so much unused space in your brain you can have two conradictory thoughts at the same time.

When you're losing debate try belittling and name calling. It'll make you look smarter.

And when you calm down try to find evidence firearms make people commit crimes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"There are going to be situations where people are going to go

without assistance. That's just the facts of life."

- - - - LA Chief of Police, Daryl Gates.

Edited by Saipan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,723
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    DACHSHUND
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

    • Ronaldo_ earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • babetteteets went up a rank
      Rookie
    • paradox34 went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • paradox34 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • phoenyx75 earned a badge
      First Post
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...