Gov't Funded Course in Sharia Law

Kanadischer · September 4, 2010

Well, sure, if only...certain...sources are examined, that might indeed appear the sober conclusion.

There are many sites on the internet which show that the US already knew about the attack on pearl harbor before it even occurred. Your fingers aren't broken, run a search on it yourself. After that you'll find other possible reasons as to why they joined, and you can also find information on the amounts of money and equipment sent to Britain before the Americans joined the war.

If you're too lazy to look it up, you obviously don't care much.

M.Dancer · September 4, 2010

That's funny because the allies wouldn't go into war with the SS unless they had a ratio of 8:1.

Two points here...

1) The allies were no fools. They always sought a numerical and tactical advantage.

2) The SS were fools to allow themselves to be outnumbered 8:1...probably because they were an inferior race.

M.Dancer · September 4, 2010

There are many sites on the internet which show that the US already knew about the attack on pearl harbor before it even occurred.

And the fact there are many sites on the internet proves what exactly? That there are addled brained wing nuts who will believe almost anything?

Hey...there aree even some whack jobs who believe in the Mighty Thor!

bloodyminded · September 5, 2010

Sober? I thought one had to be quite drunk to examine such sources. You know, the beer-google effect.

Beer-google! I like that.

Yes, drunkenness probably helps a lot.

bloodyminded · September 5, 2010

Last I checked the Jews (who you seem to hate) wrote the Old Testament. The Old Testament has something to do with what your version of "Europe" was founded on.

Good catch. Sometimes the most perfect zingers are those so obvious that they're easy to miss.

bloodyminded · September 5, 2010

There are many sites on the internet which show that the US already knew about the attack on pearl harbor before it even occurred. Your fingers aren't broken, run a search on it yourself. After that you'll find other possible reasons as to why they joined, and you can also find information on the amounts of money and equipment sent to Britain before the Americans joined the war.

If you're too lazy to look it up, you obviously don't care much.

I wasn't referring to the hypothesis about prior US knowledge of the PEarl Harbor attack. I've heard this before; and while I would not consider it an impossibility, I do know that it is not a settled and concrete truth.

But no, I was referring to your other remark:

The US joined because they knew that Britain would have gotten destroyed and the Jewish bankers of the JewSA would never see a penny of their money. That's the true reason for joining the war.

I consider sources about Jewish bankers running America (or the Earth) to be...well, kind of funny, when I think about it.

And any source that talks about, oh, "the JewSA" might not be attempting the level of objectivity that many historians struggle with.

I have put that in an extraordinarily gentle way, far exceeding what your remark deserves.

You're welcome.

Kanadischer · September 5, 2010

I consider sources about Jewish bankers running America (or the Earth) to be...well, kind of funny, when I think about it.

And any source that talks about, oh, "the JewSA" might not be attempting the level of objectivity that many historians struggle with.

I have put that in an extraordinarily gentle way, far exceeding what your remark deserves.

You're welcome.

96% of the worlds media is controlled by Jews. There is a site that I use quite often which archives information from other sites. Don't cry and complain about the name of the site, it does not write any of the material on the site, but rather archives it in case it is deleted from the original site.

check this out: http://www.jewwatch.com/jew-controlledpress-6-jewish-companies-96-percent-of-all-media.html

When you control the media, you control finance. When you control finance, you control the world.

Bonam · September 5, 2010

96% of the worlds media is controlled by Jews.

...

When you control the media, you control finance. When you control finance, you control the world.

Haha, believing that must really stick in your craw. Your perfect Aryan supermen got owned and the "subhumans" rule the world. What ya gonna do now?

bloodyminded · September 5, 2010

Haha, believing that must really stick in your craw. Your perfect Aryan supermen got owned and the "subhumans" rule the world. What ya gonna do now?

Good point!

If this poster was absolutely correct in his assessment...then he chose the losing side.

M.Dancer · September 5, 2010

96% of the worlds media is controlled by Jews. There is a site that I use quite often which archives information from other sites. Don't cry and complain about the name of the site, it does not write any of the material on the site, but rather archives it in case it is deleted from the original site.

check this out: http://www.jewwatch.com/jew-controlledpress-6-jewish-companies-96-percent-of-all-media.html

When you control the media, you control finance. When you control finance, you control the world.

Boy are you an idiot. Not just a run of the mill idiot...a mouth breathing, slack jawed, acne infested, girl friendless, wank in the closet idiot. And as a caveat, I may be over estimating you.

Shwa · September 5, 2010

Beer-google! I like that.

Yes, drunkenness probably helps a lot.

beer-(hall putsch)-googles at that!

Jack Weber · September 6, 2010

96% of the worlds media is controlled by Jews. There is a site that I use quite often which archives information from other sites. Don't cry and complain about the name of the site, it does not write any of the material on the site, but rather archives it in case it is deleted from the original site.

check this out: http://www.jewwatch.com/jew-controlledpress-6-jewish-companies-96-percent-of-all-media.html

When you control the media, you control finance. When you control finance, you control the world.

Wow...

A NAZI sympathizer who believes in a Zionist (open) conspiracy to control the world...

Well...That's pretty shocking you'd come up with that one... :blink: :rolleyes:

Why did'nt you add these two gems to give your post the "Ruthian" blast of lunacy it truly requires???

http://www.freemasonrywatch.org

http://www.bilderberg.org/

betsy · September 6, 2010

Banking and finance. Sounds so reasonable.

I wonder where the Muslim women fit in the Sharia law of banking and finance.

I guess we're just supposed to look the other way and agree that Muslim women don't have say on anything, what more so with the financial aspect. Wasn't it only a few decades ago that western women weren't privvy or have no say at all as far as banking and finance? Husbands and men in their lives dealt with those things...cos the little women didn't have the aptitude to understand those things. So men made all the decisions for them.

Wasn't it only recently that the current government changed the laws for the Aboriginal Indians.....in order to protect women in cases of divorce or widowhood etc..,

And here you are now....justifying the Sharia law. Shame!

Liberalist are never consistent!

I guess you truly think Muslim women must belong to a different specie of women. They're nothing more than chattels.

Edited September 6, 2010 by betsy

Kanadischer · September 6, 2010

Haha, believing that must really stick in your craw. Your perfect Aryan supermen got owned and the "subhumans" rule the world. What ya gonna do now?

Boy are you an idiot. Not just a run of the mill idiot...a mouth breathing, slack jawed, acne infested, girl friendless, wank in the closet idiot. And as a caveat, I may be over estimating you.

Wow...

A NAZI sympathizer who believes in a Zionist (open) conspiracy to control the world...

Well...That's pretty shocking you'd come up with that one...

Why did'nt you add these two gems to give your post the "Ruthian" blast of lunacy it truly requires???

http://www.freemasonrywatch.org

http://www.bilderberg.org/

The fact that none of you can prove me false and must result to name-calling is just pathetic. Here I am giving you sources, and you reply with such immature comments. I didn't realize I was on a forum filled with a bunch of 4th graders.

I won't be replying to anyone else's comments until I see the slightest hint of intelligence. <_<

Shwa · September 6, 2010

The fact that none of you can prove me false...

I've heard this before, this sort of sentiment. But where? Oh yeah, didn't Hitler say that a few moments before he signed off on Operation Barbarossa and began the second front by invading the Soviet Union in 1941?

I won't be replying to anyone else's comments...

Meh, your response is not required. You given enough to keep the amusement going for a very long time.

jbg · September 7, 2010

When you control the media, you control finance. When you control finance, you control the world.

Yes, 0.2% of the world's population controls the world. Hilarious how deluded you are. Mr. Jew hater!!!

jbg · September 7, 2010

Here ya go, we can now to to school to learn about Sharia Law. It seems that Sharia is becoming just another part of our pluralistic or multicultural society, so better get in on this and get learning ! #speechless-smiley-040#

The course isn't free, but all colleges are partially funded by the gov't - our tax dollars at work

Introduction to Islamic Finance & Investment

http://www.ontariolearn.com/index.php?page=course_1092

What's next, Introduction to How to Wear a Burkha :angry:

Meh, your response is not required. You given enough to keep the amusement going for a very long time.

I'm about the try to return the thread to the issues raised in the opening post.

I thin kthe idea of public support for a seditious religious course that undermines our civilization is questionable at best. I am concerned that in the name of political correctness we are undermining our very existence. The Charter and for that matter the U.S. Constitution are not suicide pacts. We do not have to support those who wish to undermine and destroy us.

M.Dancer · September 7, 2010

The fact that none of you can prove me false and must result to name-calling is just pathetic. Here I am giving you sources, and you reply with such immature comments. I didn't realize I was on a forum filled with a bunch of 4th graders.

I won't be replying to anyone else's comments until I see the slightest hint of intelligence.

The fact is there is no need to prove you false....same as if you claimed there are unicorns.

You might as well bugger off cause no one here is interested in countering you fantasies about unicorns.

Edited September 7, 2010 by M.Dancer

charter.rights · September 8, 2010

The fact that none of you can prove me false and must result to name-calling is just pathetic. Here I am giving you sources, and you reply with such immature comments. I didn't realize I was on a forum filled with a bunch of 4th graders.

I won't be replying to anyone else's comments until I see the slightest hint of intelligence.

Classic but most ineffective of all the fallacy arguments :Argumentum ad Ignorantiam

Talk about being a 4th Grader. I bet you had trouble getting out of grade 2. And an American too. How is it that an American would come here to troll a Canadian political site. Certainly there is too much American conservatism to laugh at that we don't need your theatre here.

Aleksandar Maksimovic · September 8, 2010

Well that is odd...

You get what you pay for I guess.

But the government is funding it...

Very disruptive to me.

I would love to understand the main idea of this deeper.

Shwa · September 9, 2010

I'm about the try to return the thread to the issues raised in the opening post.

Probably a good idea.

I thin kthe idea of public support for a seditious religious course that undermines our civilization is questionable at best. I am concerned that in the name of political correctness we are undermining our very existence.

Excuse the phrasing, but this is what I would call a 'weak-minded' approach. There is an underlying assumption that our "very existence" lacks the capacity to absorb and regulate those sorts of things which at first appear to be harmful to our existence when the very opposite has been proven true time and time again.

The Charter and for that matter the U.S. Constitution are not suicide pacts. We do not have to support those who wish to undermine and destroy us.

Of course we don't and we have laws for that. However there are plenty of cultural laws that continue with all kinds of immigrant culture groups now and we don't apply the same test to them because they are currently not newsworthy.

Everyday rape and murder in Canada and the US has done more damage to "our existence" than any Sharia teachings or learning about what those teachings mean to a particular culture group. You want to protect "our existence?" Do something about all the rape and murder in North America. Let me know when you feel powerless do anything about it.

CANADIEN · September 11, 2010

The fact that none of you can prove me false and must result to name-calling is just pathetic. Here I am giving you sources, and you reply with such immature comments. I didn't realize I was on a forum filled with a bunch of 4th graders.

I won't be replying to anyone else's comments until I see the slightest hint of intelligence.

And none of us could prove an Earth-flat believer that the Earth is round.

As for not replying until you see a sign of intelligence... nice to know you won't be talking to yourself.

CANADIEN · September 11, 2010

I'm about the try to return the thread to the issues raised in the opening post.

I thin kthe idea of public support for a seditious religious course that undermines our civilization is questionable at best. I am concerned that in the name of political correctness we are undermining our very existence. The Charter and for that matter the U.S. Constitution are not suicide pacts. We do not have to support those who wish to undermine and destroy us.

Actually, the course in question is about a religion-based system of economic transaction,s not a religion course, not even a course ABOUT religion per say. So unless one can demonstrate that a no-interest-loan banking system is contrary to our laws, or undermining our society - and one would have to go way down the path of lillogical thinking to come with such a demonstration - the claim that the course is wrong or dangerous or seditious is illofical at best, and plainly ridiculous at worse.

As for the "the charter is not a suicide pact" line, interesting that it comes usually as a justification for measures that actually undermine what we have achieved as a free society. The Islamists are not gonna win with bomb, they are not gonna win with numbers. If they ever win (which is doubtful), it will be because we will have jettisoned our freedoms ourselves to the tune of "the Constitution is not a suicide pact".

Edited September 12, 2010 by CANADIEN

Shwa · September 12, 2010

If they ever win (which is doubtful) is that we will have jettisoned our freedoms ourselves to the tune of "the Constitution is not a suicide pact".

I think the tune will sound like the Camptown Races:

The Constitution's not-a suicide pact

doo-dah, doo-dah

Bill o' Rights will keep-us intact

Oh, doo-dah day.

Or something like that.

Kanadischer · September 13, 2010

Classic but most ineffective of all the fallacy arguments :Argumentum ad Ignorantiam

Talk about being a 4th Grader. I bet you had trouble getting out of grade 2. And an American too. How is it that an American would come here to troll a Canadian political site. Certainly there is too much American conservatism to laugh at that we don't need your theatre here.

Kanadischer is a variation of the word "kanadier" which means Canadian in German. I hate america, and refuse to go there ever again Sorry I haven't been too active on the posts lately friends, I'm leaving for Europe today! Ciao until the 5th :rolleyes: