Jump to content
A Note on Topic Titles – Be Clear & Descriptive!

PM won't punish Shory over fraud investigation

msdogfood
 Share

Recommended Posts

Oleg Bach Grand Master

Oleg Bach

Posted
Posted

The PM is sticking to a tacit policy of tolerance and protection of the dis-honourable who tack on the title of honourable when they take office. What do you expect..judges that run the courts protect evil - because evil generates income and they are addicted to it..there is not much to be expected from a PM that in effect is appointed by the banks..who also have friends in a corrupt judicary - that loves to release crimminals in order to harrass and control the good population - good people are a threat to the powers that be.

ZenOps Community Regular

ZenOps

Posted
Posted (edited)

Why would the PM punish Shory? Thats not the PM's job.

Its a job for the criminal courts to determine guilt or innocence.

If anything - I see it more like a coach and the team. You can only blame the players so much, even when they do stupid things and make bad plays, eventually though - you do have to lay some blame on the coach.

In which case the PM should be punished if Shory is found guilty.

Edited by ZenOps
Oleg Bach Grand Master

Oleg Bach

Posted
Posted

At the court of appeal I saw a former employee of a major AMERICAN corporation that had some information about Dick Cheney being involved in some questionable actions. Our courts were extraditing the poor guy - he was terrified ..what makes you think that our courts do not have a tacit policy of assisting crimminality at the highest and most respected level?

wyly Grand Master

wyly

Posted
Posted (edited)

Why would the PM punish Shory? Thats not the PM's job.

Its a job for the criminal courts to determine guilt or innocence.

huh! Guergis, gets kicked from cabinet(rightly so), then from caucus(why?), then from the party on what evidence?.. none says the PI who investigated her...and who did all the kicking? ya that's right, the PM...

now we have a cabinet minister under criminal investigation and he still holds his cabinet position when at the very least the PM should ask him to step away from the job until he is cleared of wrong doing...

there is more going on here then PM would have us believe....

Edited by wyly

“Conservatives are not necessarily stupid, but most stupid people are conservatives.”- John Stuart Mill

Oleg Bach Grand Master

Oleg Bach

Posted
Posted

The publicly percieve integrity of government must be up held at all cost. To bring government in to ill repute by policy is a mistake - once confidence is lost in government - people will with hold their taxes - and that means governmental pay cheaques will eventually end. GOVERNMENT has no power without law enforcement and law enforcement will NOT turn on the people to enforce corruption - cops are also citizens.

August1991 Grand Master

August1991

Posted
Posted
Tell that to Helena.
For the 20% or so of English Canadians who hate Harper, he's damned if he does, and damned if he doesn't.

Harper has a reputation for standing by his caucus/ministers well beyond what seems reasonable or even politically wise. I think he kicked Guergis out of cabinet and caucus because of A) strong suspicion of wrongdoing and/or B) caucus members wanting him to do it.

Oleg Bach Grand Master

Oleg Bach

Posted
Posted

No one hates Harper. Why would they bother? To hate Harper is to empower him and that is what he wants..He is very old school in his approach of using emotionalism to befuddle the public and gain some sort of control over them - Once you hate - they own you>

Keepitsimple Grand Master

Keepitsimple

Posted
Posted

Why would the PM punish Shory? Thats not the PM's job.

Its a job for the criminal courts to determine guilt or innocence.

If anything - I see it more like a coach and the team. You can only blame the players so much, even when they do stupid things and make bad plays, eventually though - you do have to lay some blame on the coach.

In which case the PM should be punished if Shory is found guilty.

You should read the story first. Shory has not been charged with anything criminal. He is being sued by one of the big Banks - along with about 100 other people.....for something that allegedly occurred two years before he became an MP. In case you didn't know it - a lawsuit is conducted in civil court - not a criminal court. Big Banks don't like to lose their money and they have enough lawyers and money to go after anyone and everyone.

Back to Basics

YEGmann Community Regular

YEGmann

Posted
Posted

The liberal followers plainly do not get it.

Shory is a victim here (kind of). The BMO is going after his lawyer's insurance to recover their own - and only their own - lack of due dilligence.

msdogfood Proficient

msdogfood

Posted
  • Author
Posted

You should read the story first. Shory has not been charged with anything criminal. He is being sued by one of the big Banks - along with about 100 other people.....for something that allegedly occurred two years before he became an MP. In case you didn't know it - a lawsuit is conducted in civil court - not a criminal court. Big Banks don't like to lose their money and they have enough lawyers and money to go after anyone and everyone.

true but the RCMP sent out a statement indicating they are looking in to this!.

This time it was not referred to the RCMP by the PMO!

msdogfood Proficient

msdogfood

Posted
  • Author
Posted

The publicly percieve integrity of government must be up held at all cost. To bring government in to ill repute by policy is a mistake - once confidence is lost in government - people will with hold their taxes - and that means governmental pay cheaques will eventually end. GOVERNMENT has no power without law enforcement and law enforcement will NOT turn on the people to enforce corruption - cops are also citizens.

ah tell that to jaffer!

msdogfood Proficient

msdogfood

Posted
  • Author
Posted (edited)

Very true but than there is this!!.

The Law Society of Alberta is now looking in to this to!

What The Law Society of Alberta does not cont or something???.

Edited by msdogfood

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!

  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,907
    • Most Online
      1,403
    derek848
    Newest Member
    derek848
    Joined

  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      Benz
      Benz earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • One Year In
      Videospirit
      Videospirit earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Posting Machine
      Barquentine
      Barquentine earned a badge
      Posting Machine
    • Week One Done
      stindles
      stindles earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      stindles
      stindles earned a badge
      One Month Later

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...