Oleg Bach Posted November 24, 2009 Report Posted November 24, 2009 Also: The writer admits that we make China angry...that's not a good sign - for a leadership that is governed by emotion..and not logic...If America submits to being China's economic and possibly military child - are we going to get a severe beating by our new step father? I don't need no pappa like this! Quote
Oleg Bach Posted November 24, 2009 Report Posted November 24, 2009 He led Chinese people stopped the one-century-long robbery started by England since 1848, drive all robbers away no matter they from Japan, Europe, North America, or Australia. The robbery had convert china that produce one third of the world production into a hell. The old British empire and their international lackies are still up to know good - If you have not noticed that Queen of England and the Church or England are still attempting to wage war on the Muslims --- You would think that these superstitous twits would end this 600 year old war...but no..they justify the invations and the plunder in the idea that Jesus is now carrying a sword...which is a mistake. Quote
bush_cheney2004 Posted November 24, 2009 Author Report Posted November 24, 2009 He led Chinese people stopped the one-century-long robbery started by England since 1848, drive all robbers away no matter they from Japan, Europe, North America, or Australia. The robbery had convert china that produce one third of the world production into a hell. After Britain, North America, and Australia saved them from a serious Japanese problem. Tennōheika banzai!!!!!! Quote Economics trumps Virtue.
Oleg Bach Posted November 24, 2009 Report Posted November 24, 2009 The British elite are still piss off at the idea of the Muslim bastard who attempted to mount the royal brood mare Diana..that they no longer had use for - Just like rich people hugh? They call the cops when you steal their carbage. Quote
bjre Posted November 24, 2009 Report Posted November 24, 2009 After Britain, North America, and Australia saved them from a serious Japanese problem. Tennōheika banzai!!!!!! What is their behave in Korea in 1950s, if they have so able enough, why they can not win Mao in that small place instead of a large china? Quote "The more laws, the less freedom" -- bjre "There are so many laws that nearly everybody breaks some, even when you just stay at home do nothing, the only question left is how thugs can use laws to attack you" -- bjre "If people let government decide what foods they eat and what medicines they take, their bodies will soon be in as sorry a state as are the souls of those who live under tyranny." -- Thomas Jefferson
bush_cheney2004 Posted November 24, 2009 Author Report Posted November 24, 2009 Also: The writer admits that we make China angry...that's not a good sign - for a leadership that is governed by emotion..and not logic...If America submits to being China's economic and possibly military child - are we going to get a severe beating by our new step father? I don't need no pappa like this! China served a very useful purpose during the Cold War, even as it loaded up on Soviet junk and cast-offs. Nixon saw the opportunity (as did Trudeau)....the rest is history. Quote Economics trumps Virtue.
Oleg Bach Posted November 24, 2009 Report Posted November 24, 2009 What is their behave in Korea in 1950s, if they have so able enough, why they can not win Mao in that small place instead of a large china? Because our elite wanted things to be this way. China forgets that it is our shadow government that financed the revolution and that China should understand that our old elite are alive just like their old guys are..and that OUR guys are the bosses. Think what you will but the old guard will never turn on our old guard because they would be lost without our capitalist leadership...capitialist always finace socialism - We are management - and china is the factory floor. Quote
eyeball Posted November 24, 2009 Report Posted November 24, 2009 Not so much Christian guilt as a successful post WW2 strategy against the former Soviet Union.....emphasis on "former". To bad the west had to sell out its own principles to succeed, or should I say not fail as fast. China is doomed for pretty much the same reason. If you've seen one super-rogue you've seen them all. Quote I said now watch what you say they'll be calling you a radical, a liberal, oh fanatical criminal
bjre Posted November 24, 2009 Report Posted November 24, 2009 Because our elite wanted things to be this way. China forgets that it is our shadow government that financed the revolution and that China should understand that our old elite are alive just like their old guys are..and that OUR guys are the bosses. Think what you will but the old guard will never turn on our old guard because they would be lost without our capitalist leadership...capitialist always finace socialism - We are management - and china is the factory floor. Then, just ask Harper don't release a news about Afghan prisoner torture to pretend he has find a reason for skipping his hypocritical human right lecture in China. Quote "The more laws, the less freedom" -- bjre "There are so many laws that nearly everybody breaks some, even when you just stay at home do nothing, the only question left is how thugs can use laws to attack you" -- bjre "If people let government decide what foods they eat and what medicines they take, their bodies will soon be in as sorry a state as are the souls of those who live under tyranny." -- Thomas Jefferson
Oleg Bach Posted November 24, 2009 Report Posted November 24, 2009 Then, just ask Harper don't release a news about Afghan prisoner torture to pretend he has find a reason for skipping his hypocritical human right lecture in China. Listen - I am not saying we are better than you...you as I wish the world to be a better place..but it seems that those that strive for power and domain are not our best - good luck with your dreams and ideals - If you want a better world for all then you have my full support - forget about Harper - in a real democracy it is you and I that rule. You have the same amount of power as your highest leader as do I - Just don't offend them because overly ambitious men are violent..so proceed with gentleness the same way you tame a vicious dog with loving strokes - not kicks. China does have a chance - but not if you are affected and infected by our worst traits and people. Quote
Oleg Bach Posted November 24, 2009 Report Posted November 24, 2009 I was listening to the Michael Savage show last week and he said something funny - that he would have been impressed had Obama went to China and told the Chinese: we'll pay you pennies on the dollar for all we owe you. Take it or leave it! Obama would've been THE MAN if he did that. Ah well, we can all dream. Why not? What is China going to do? Will they stop sending us Walmart junk that cloggs up our landfill sites...heaven forbid! Put it this way - the value of the product does not equal the dept..there product stinks..BUT we have contractual law in place here..It reminds me of when an appliance sales person victimized this poor lady that had to attend small claims court...over a Fridge. The retail value of the fridge was about 600 dollars - I added up what she had paid this little weasil to date. She had paid in full..about 24 hundred dollars..but the contract stated that she must continue to pay...so the weasil of a judge and the creepy little immigrant paralegal managed to continue to guarnishee her wages- The woman quit her job rather than give this jerk five times what the product was worth. Who draws up these godamned contracts with China? Quote
Oleg Bach Posted November 24, 2009 Report Posted November 24, 2009 China served a very useful purpose during the Cold War, even as it loaded up on Soviet junk and cast-offs. Nixon saw the opportunity (as did Trudeau)....the rest is history. Who cares about history? - he who heeds it to much is bound to repeat it. Quote
Guest TrueMetis Posted November 24, 2009 Report Posted November 24, 2009 (edited) What is their behave in Korea in 1950s, if they have so able enough, why they can not win Mao in that small place instead of a large china? The Chinese were slaughtered during the Korean war, some battles had a 22 to 1 kill ratio in the UN forces favour. Edited November 24, 2009 by TrueMetis Quote
bjre Posted November 24, 2009 Report Posted November 24, 2009 (edited) The Chinese were slaughtered during the Korean war, some battles had a 22 to 1 kill ratio in the UN forces favour. How many Iraqis be killed by each US soldier? 100? How many Japanese killed by each atom bomb they drop by one US soldier? If Mao don't use 22 to kill one UN soldier, they will kill 100 in China after they pass through Korea, that is what MacArthur wanted, he suggested use atom bomb in China. Don't try to pretend nice with a gun in hand. Edited November 24, 2009 by bjre Quote "The more laws, the less freedom" -- bjre "There are so many laws that nearly everybody breaks some, even when you just stay at home do nothing, the only question left is how thugs can use laws to attack you" -- bjre "If people let government decide what foods they eat and what medicines they take, their bodies will soon be in as sorry a state as are the souls of those who live under tyranny." -- Thomas Jefferson
Oleg Bach Posted November 24, 2009 Report Posted November 24, 2009 He is the one who saved China from western robbers and destroyers. Those western robbers and destroyers also sent weapons to Mao to destroy his own countrymen...looks like the young in China are just as naive about the ways of the world as the western kids are..you will learn - not to give support to those that do not care or love you..Do you think that Mao would have spared your life if you questioned him? The only friends that the people have are each other - world wide - Those that rise to a high position have no friends. Quote
Guest TrueMetis Posted November 24, 2009 Report Posted November 24, 2009 How many Iraqis be killed by each US soldier? 100? How many Japanese killed by each atom bomb they drop by one US soldier? If Mao don't use 22 to kill one UN soldier, they will kill 100 in China after they pass through Korea, that is what MacArthur wanted, he suggested use atom bomb in China. Don't try to pretend nice with a gun in hand. The UN forces won the Korean war, it was about stopping the North Korean forces and their allies from invading and conquering South Korea. Which the UN forces did do. It was not about invading China. North Korea and its allies were the aggressors. Quote
bjre Posted November 24, 2009 Report Posted November 24, 2009 US has much better weapon than China at that time. Why they can not win? Mao said, Weapon is important, but it is not most important, the most important is the support from people. Yes, you can occupy Iraq with your killing weapons, but you can not win the support there before you kill them all. Quote "The more laws, the less freedom" -- bjre "There are so many laws that nearly everybody breaks some, even when you just stay at home do nothing, the only question left is how thugs can use laws to attack you" -- bjre "If people let government decide what foods they eat and what medicines they take, their bodies will soon be in as sorry a state as are the souls of those who live under tyranny." -- Thomas Jefferson
bjre Posted November 24, 2009 Report Posted November 24, 2009 The UN forces won the Korean war, it was about stopping the North Korean forces and their allies from invading and conquering South Korea. Which the UN forces did do. It was not about invading China. North Korea and its allies were the aggressors. Totally lie, they attacked into China cross the YaLu river before China involved. Quote "The more laws, the less freedom" -- bjre "There are so many laws that nearly everybody breaks some, even when you just stay at home do nothing, the only question left is how thugs can use laws to attack you" -- bjre "If people let government decide what foods they eat and what medicines they take, their bodies will soon be in as sorry a state as are the souls of those who live under tyranny." -- Thomas Jefferson
Guest TrueMetis Posted November 24, 2009 Report Posted November 24, 2009 (edited) US has much better weapon than China at that time. Why they can not win? Mao said, Weapon is important, but it is not most important, the most important is the support from people. They did win, and it wasn't just the U.S. It was many countries under the UN banner. Yes, you can occupy Iraq with your killing weapons, but you can not win the support there before you kill them all. Don't care about Iraq Canada is in Afghanistan. Totally lie, they attacked into China cross the YaLu river before China involved. Cite your source. Edited November 24, 2009 by TrueMetis Quote
Oleg Bach Posted November 24, 2009 Report Posted November 24, 2009 He is the one who saved China from western robbers and destroyers. Now he has made it that the whole family of China is being robbed and destroyed by those very people that Mao protected you from...it's a slave state...as is ours. The western robbers and destroyers still exist - these are the sons and grandsons of the same guys that China does buisness with - The difference is that now this second generation of destroyers destroys not only the east but the west as well. Quote
bjre Posted November 24, 2009 Report Posted November 24, 2009 They did win, and it wasn't just the U.S. It was many countries under the UN banner. Enjoy your dream. Cite your source. Don't have time to find suitable cite now, The following is from wiki: The United States and the United Nations intervened on the side of the South. After a rapid UN counteroffensive that repelled North Koreans past the 38th Parallel and almost to the Yalu River, the People's Republic of China (PRC) came to the aid of the North.[32] [32]^ a b Devine, Robert A.; Breen, T. H.; Frederickson, George M.; Williams, R. Hal; Gross, Adriela J.; Brands, H.W (2007). America Past and Present 8th Ed. Volume II: Since 1865. Peason Longman. pp. 819–821. ISBN 0-321-44661-5. Actually, the US Bomber has already bomb into China at that time. But the western media always try to hide this history. Quote "The more laws, the less freedom" -- bjre "There are so many laws that nearly everybody breaks some, even when you just stay at home do nothing, the only question left is how thugs can use laws to attack you" -- bjre "If people let government decide what foods they eat and what medicines they take, their bodies will soon be in as sorry a state as are the souls of those who live under tyranny." -- Thomas Jefferson
Oleg Bach Posted November 24, 2009 Report Posted November 24, 2009 I have to go now - lets be friends - My dad was born close to the boarder of China - that sort of makes me an easterner..better to be friends and help each others large families than fight...thank you. Quote
bjre Posted November 24, 2009 Report Posted November 24, 2009 I have to go now - lets be friends - My dad was born close to the boarder of China - that sort of makes me an easterner..better to be friends and help each others large families than fight...thank you. OK. To have more friends is always a nice thing. :-) Quote "The more laws, the less freedom" -- bjre "There are so many laws that nearly everybody breaks some, even when you just stay at home do nothing, the only question left is how thugs can use laws to attack you" -- bjre "If people let government decide what foods they eat and what medicines they take, their bodies will soon be in as sorry a state as are the souls of those who live under tyranny." -- Thomas Jefferson
bjre Posted November 24, 2009 Report Posted November 24, 2009 (edited) Now he has made it that the whole family of China is being robbed and destroyed by those very people that Mao protected you from...it's a slave state...as is ours. The western robbers and destroyers still exist - these are the sons and grandsons of the same guys that China does buisness with - The difference is that now this second generation of destroyers destroys not only the east but the west as well. If you call China a slave state, then Canada is the same. most people have to work to make living to make their boss to earn more. And they are taxed in a much higher rate than China. Edited November 24, 2009 by bjre Quote "The more laws, the less freedom" -- bjre "There are so many laws that nearly everybody breaks some, even when you just stay at home do nothing, the only question left is how thugs can use laws to attack you" -- bjre "If people let government decide what foods they eat and what medicines they take, their bodies will soon be in as sorry a state as are the souls of those who live under tyranny." -- Thomas Jefferson
Gabriel Posted November 24, 2009 Report Posted November 24, 2009 Obama would have been "the man" if he made the U.S. into a basketcase nation that requires debt relief? I knew Michael Savage was an idiot, but I didn't realize he was that stupid. What the hell are you talking about? How would a negotiation (or ultimatum) regarding the American debt owned by China turn America into a nation requiring debt relief? What does 'debt relief' even mean? I wasn't being entirely serious, anyways. But it was a hilarious suggestion from Michael Savage - who is an American treasure. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.