Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
He also cautioned about using the military.

From your own link:

However your guy wants to go in regardless.

http://www.ctv.ca/servlet/ArticleNews/stor...60507/20060508/

That is a troop commitment right there. Troops out of Afghanistan to Darfur.

I don't see it.

Layton said a major Canadian commitment to a UN mission in Darfur, where at least 180,000 people have died and millions are refugees because of a bitter civil war, would likely get much broader public backing.

"Our view is that this is exactly the kind of peacekeeping role that Canadians have always supported,'' Layton said Sunday. "Canada invented the concept of UN-led peacekeeping forces under (then diplomat Lester) Pearson'' in the 1950s.

Where is the troop commitment. I think saying going after the leader through "any means necessary" as Iggy has said is a much more escalating statement then saying. "If our people don't support a war we should get out and if they support peacekeeping somewhere we should do that"

Personally your attack is a bit of a big lie. Not like this is site on Iggy. Yes if our people want something we should do it. What is wrong with that I know liberals would think they don't know what is best for them but I think the Canadian people are pretty smart.

  • Replies 89
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted (edited)
I'm not surprised you don't.

Yah because you like to put words in peoples mouth instead of looking at what they have actually said like Iggy there and his support of Republican Intervention for 6 years in Iraq.

Edited by punked
Posted
Yah because you like to put words in peoples mouth instead of looking at what they have actually said like Iggy there and his support of Republican Intervention for 6 years in Iraq.

If you want to think that what Latron said doesn't man troops, by all means. He must just want to mention moving Afghan troops and Darfur in the same press conference for no reason.

Posted
If you want to think that what Latron said doesn't man troops, by all means. He must just want to mention moving Afghan troops and Darfur in the same press conference for no reason.

See this is the problem you don't see a key concept in this equations Layton said the will of the Canadian people. If the Canadian people want it.

Not like Iggy in the past who has supported sending troops into Israel to enforce peace, something the AMERICAN people becuase he was ignoring Canada at this point did not support.

One leader thinks we should listen to the people the other feels he has reached moral high ground where he can answer to know one but himself.

Posted
See this is the problem you don't see a key concept in this equations Layton said the will of the Canadian people. If the Canadian people want it.

Canadians wanted to help Afghanistan too. Layton was against it.

Posted (edited)
Canadians wanted to help Afghanistan too. Layton was against it.

And they want out and Layton is for it, while the Liberals and Conservatives extend the mission time and time again.

But this isn't about Layton it is about Ignatieff and his poor judgement time and time again. On intervention in Iraq, on Torture, and his beliefs we should throw our morals out the door. We play by the rules becuase if we didn't who would?

Edited by punked
Posted
And they want out and Layton is for it, while the Liberals and Conservatives extend the mission time and time again.

The polls said that Canadians want to finish the mission by the deadline. The NDP want to remove them now.

But this isn't about Layton it is about Ignatieff and his poor judgement time and time again. On intervention in Iraq, on Torture, and his beliefs we should throw our morals out the door. We play by the rules becuase if we didn't who would?

It is all about Layton about how he wants to go to into another war in Darfur.

Posted
Now, it would be nice if Tories would own up to it.

I certainly hope the site is up if an election is held. Elections Canada could count it as a party ad.

It would be nice if the liberals would own up to grit girl.

"What about the legitimacy of the democratic process, yeah, what about it?" Jack Layton and his coup against the people of Canada

“The nine most terrifying words in the English language are, ‘I’m from the government and I’m here to help.’”

President Ronald Reagan

Posted
It would be nice if the liberals would own up to grit girl.

I think that would seem obvious from the name of the poster, right?

Posted
I think that would seem obvious from the name of the poster, right?

so grit girl is a liberal party advertising source.

"What about the legitimacy of the democratic process, yeah, what about it?" Jack Layton and his coup against the people of Canada

“The nine most terrifying words in the English language are, ‘I’m from the government and I’m here to help.’”

President Ronald Reagan

Posted

I just wanted to point out with VP Dick in the news for this same thing. Republican Ignatieff was for it the whole time geneva convention be damned.

"We might even have to engage in certain forms of targeted assassination"- Republican cheerleader Ignatieff

Bush must have loved this guy no wonder they set up a site for him.

Posted
so grit girl is a liberal party advertising source.

She certainly appears to be a Liberal party member. And it is Liberal advertising.

I wonder if Conservatives will come clean about the site they are running.

Posted
She certainly appears to be a Liberal party member. And it is Liberal advertising.

I wonder if Conservatives will come clean about the site they are running.

I wonder if the liberals wil come clean about grit girl.

"What about the legitimacy of the democratic process, yeah, what about it?" Jack Layton and his coup against the people of Canada

“The nine most terrifying words in the English language are, ‘I’m from the government and I’m here to help.’”

President Ronald Reagan

Posted
I wonder if the liberals wil come clean about grit girl.

What do you want to know about her? We know that she is a Liberal.

Posted
What do you want to know about her? We know that she is a Liberal.

And we know Republicans are conservatives at heart. Might be why they are supporting a conservative for PM in Iggy.

Posted
And we know Republicans are conservatives at heart. Might be why they are supporting a conservative for PM in Iggy.

Consevative party of Canada members? Wow, I didn't know that.

Posted
Nope sorry I assumed it was Republicans who live in Canada who started the site.

And I thought it was New Democrats.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,907
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    derek848
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

    • Benz earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Videospirit earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Barquentine earned a badge
      Posting Machine
    • stindles earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • stindles earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...