Jump to content

Suncor, Petro-Canada announce merger


Recommended Posts

How does that matter, jdobbin? They buy the company for its assets and turf its management for now being redundant. End of story!

Too bad Maurice Strong wasn't still there to receive a pink slip!

I am very proud of the fact that in my entire life I have only purchased $2 worth of gas from PetroCanada. It was in the early 80's when I was running on fumes in a rural area and the only gas station within reach was a PC. That $2 was enough to get my Rabbit convertible to another brand of station.

I've always been bothered by the fact that PetroCanada never sold a drop of Canadian gas! They bought it all from Libya and Venezuela. Plus I was offended by the manner the company was put together in the first place.

One of the few times I've been able to vote with my feet!

Right on WB, I recoil at the sight of the country's name on their sign. All our money spent on yet another Liberal folly to save us from high gas prices.

I'll drive by three of their stations to buy gas from one of others. And I buy only gas from any of them

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Right on WB, I recoil at the sight of the country's name on their sign. All our money spent on yet another Liberal folly to save us from high gas prices.

I'll drive by three of their stations to buy gas from one of others. And I buy only gas from any of them

Typically they are the highest priced station in the area, first to raise prices and last to lower them. i can't remeber the last time I bought gas from them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Competition? That was the line handed us for forming Petro-Can in the first place! It was implied that they would force the other guys to keep their prices down in order to compete with them.

Of course, this turned out to be a total crock! Petro-Can stations were always the first to put their prices up and the last to lower them! They simply became just another player that "hosed" us all.

It has been said many times that the true bottleneck for competition with pricing has always been the lack of refinery capacity. It really doesn't matter how many service stations there are if they all get their fuel from the same few refineries.

After all these years we've never seen Petro-Can or anybody else build even ONE new refinery!

According to Wikipedia, Petro-Canada started in 1975.

Also according to Wikipedia, Shell started up the Scotford Refinery in 1984.

What does that tell us?

It tells us you're wrong.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You've got something against buying Canadian, or did you just not know?

Where I live almost everything comes from the same oil sources. Besides that, I don't go for the buy xxxxxxxxx line.

Edited by Smallc
Link to comment
Share on other sites

According to Wikipedia, Petro-Canada started in 1975.

Also according to Wikipedia, Shell started up the Scotford Refinery in 1984.

It tells us you're wrong.

Ok, I was wrong. There was ONE built! Were there TWO?

How much did consumption increase over those decades compared to the increased supply of that one refinery?

How many refineries were built by PetroCanada to force down the wholesale price of gasoline to the gas stations, allowing room to discount the price to us poor citizens, who had been told all the money spent to form PetroCanada was a good deal for us 'cuz it would give us a break at the pumps and give us more reasons to vote Liberal!

I think you're picking at my model and ignoring my point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Rules put in place when Petro-Canada was a state-owned company limit any investor from owning more than 20 percent of the company. How Suncor will overcome this government hurdle wasn't immediately clear. It could structure the transaction as a reverse takeover, which technically means that Petro-Canada will be the surviving legal entity, even though Suncor will be in full control of the merged company.

http://dealbook.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/03/...ises-questions/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Rules put in place when Petro-Canada was a state-owned company limit any investor from owning more than 20 percent of the company. How Suncor will overcome this government hurdle wasn't immediately clear. It could structure the transaction as a reverse takeover, which technically means that Petro-Canada will be the surviving legal entity, even though Suncor will be in full control of the merged company.

http://dealbook.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/03/...ises-questions/

Yep, I caught a radio newstype spouting off about the merger. She called Petro an "iconic" Canadian company, damn near drove off the road.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,734
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    exPS
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...