Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
msj, I think the key point (IMV) is that regulations don't stop speculative bubbles. (I'll admit that government can prevent panics but in doing so, government may exacerbate bubbles.)

When some people are wrongly terrified that they will be poor, government (society) can step in and reassure them. But when some people are (wrongly) convinced that they will be rich, I don't think government (anyone) can convince them otherwise.

Bubbles (false euphoria, irrational exuberance) are a fact of life.

It seems to me panic usully sets in even faster whenever someone proposes governments try to prevent bubbles - 'let the market decide' the people cry.

A government without public oversight is like a nuclear plant without lead shielding.

  • Replies 77
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted (edited)
It seems to me panic usully sets in even faster whenever someone proposes governments try to prevent bubbles - 'let the market decide' the people cry.
A panic is far, far worse than the collapse of a bubble.

This is the collapse of a bubble, managed by ordinary bureaucrats (Bernanke) and neophyte politicians (Obama). It's nothing like a panic.

Greenspan managed these collapses far better, indeed too well.

Edited by August1991
Posted
A panic is far, far worse than the collapse of a bubble.

This is the collapse of a bubble, managed by ordinary bureaucrats (Bernanke) and neophyte politicians (Obama). It's nothing like a panic.

Greenspan managed these collapses far better, indeed too well.

The problem, as Floyd Norris mentions in the New York Times, is that "n sum, the Fed thought it had learned the lessons of the 1930s, but it had not learned the lesson of the 1920s, that allowing asset prices to soar to absurdly leveraged heights could lead to a financial collapse as the need to repay loans forced sales that drove prices lower, resulting in the need to repay more loans, and so on and so on."

At least the leadership at the Fed is in place now to deal with the lessons of the 1930's (Bernanke does know his history better than most).

It is too bad that Greenspan's ideology would not allow him to know the history of the 1920's (and other eras) since he was unable to understand that, yes, bubbles really do exist.

If a believer demands that I, as a non-believer, observe his taboos in the public domain, he is not asking for my respect but for my submission. And that is incompatible with a secular democracy. Flemming Rose (Dutch journalist)

My biggest takeaway from economics is that the past wasn't as good as you remember, the present isn't as bad as you think, and the future will be better than you anticipate. Morgan Housel http://www.fool.com/investing/general/2016/01/14/things-im-pretty-sure-about.aspx

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,907
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    derek848
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

    • stindles earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • stindles earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Doowangle earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Doowangle earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Barquentine went up a rank
      Proficient
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...