Oleg Bach Posted January 23, 2009 Report Posted January 23, 2009 After all the word smithing and the hundreds of prepared speeches written for him by brilliant young men in their twenties who sit at Star Bucks with their lap tops - You would think that Obama could recite the oath that is being spoken to him - and all he has to do is repeat the words a second later...But no! He joked on the part that expects him to execute faithfully the constitution that is supposed to be his holy hand book. From what I understand he had to repeat the oath privately to get it right - I assume that unless the oath is given publically to the American people at large that it is not in legitimate. After all he is not giving the oath to a few elite that expect him to do their bidding - but he is giving the oath to all of the American people. Every last citizen is the master of this representative - and he chokes on the word "faithfully". This cosmic hic cup may be a sign of what is to come, that he will not be loyal to the people as he should - and what's this buisness about running against the Clintonites...then hiring his advesary? Just as I suspected, Obama is just another surrogate Bush, who speaks better - but I might add _Bush may be of superiour intellect and Obama is a parrot. Quote
sharkman Posted January 23, 2009 Report Posted January 23, 2009 It looked like a flub on both their parts. Obama wouldn't let the justice finish the first line of the oath before he started repeating it, and then Roberts misplaced the word faithfully. In the pictures shown of the second oath, some noticed Obama didn't use a bible. There, that ought to get the anti-bible people flaming me! Quote
Muddy Posted January 23, 2009 Report Posted January 23, 2009 What a lot of nonsence. Someone made a mistake. Chief Justice or Obama. Big deal. Petty stuff. Quote
guyser Posted January 23, 2009 Report Posted January 23, 2009 From what I understand he had to repeat the oath privately to get it right . Stop talking to your toaster then. It was Roberts who f'd it up. It was Roberts who went to see Obama to re-do it. Obama can be seen on tape stopping since he knew that Roberts flubbed it and he looks like he wanted to give Roberts a chance to correct it. And yes, no bible the second time around. Hell, didnt have to have one the first time. Not mandatory. Quote
Oleg Bach Posted January 23, 2009 Author Report Posted January 23, 2009 It looked like a flub on both their parts. Obama wouldn't let the justice finish the first line of the oath before he started repeating it, and then Roberts misplaced the word faithfully.In the pictures shown of the second oath, some noticed Obama didn't use a bible. There, that ought to get the anti-bible people flaming me! Sure it was a flub...but in the whole cosmic scheme of things it may just be a hint of what is in the core of the little man - fankly ---and not to sound racist or superiour in any manner - Obamas head is small and his ears are to big I believe that you have to have a big brain to be president..and his is small. As for the bible - it's a nasty little book other then a few passages in the NT...swearing on it makes me cringe in my old age - knowing now that this compulation of old manuscripts is based on war deception and the destruction of others for personal gain and power. It's kind of the rich man's version of the Art Of War..... My original and serious point was that Obama may not be the brilliant guy we all assume he is - he may be twice as dumb as George - but that's how they want them...stupid and proud and ready to be the arch henchmen for men we will never know or see...now were is my tin foil hat? Quote
Muddy Posted January 23, 2009 Report Posted January 23, 2009 Oleg, you mean you can tell a persons intelligence by the size of their ears and cranium. Wow! Should only pretty people like you I presume need apply for leadership? Quote
Oleg Bach Posted January 23, 2009 Author Report Posted January 23, 2009 Oleg, you mean you can tell a persons intelligence by the size of their ears and cranium. Wow! Should only pretty people like you I presume need apply for leadership? Ha ha...This is not a leader...America does not elect leaders..they provide theatrical parrots to speak and a committee that is unelected rules..Having said that. Yes - you need a powerful well bred man to stand up to the committee - not some glory seeking - ego strutting guy that has a lust for green helicopters and total worldly success and human approval. As for the pretty factor - His wife is common and quite homely - in fact all the designer dresses in the world will not elevate her....Finally ----If every speech he spoke was of his own mind then I would say hail to the new king - but he is a pin headed parrot. Quote
Muddy Posted January 23, 2009 Report Posted January 23, 2009 Ha ha...This is not a leader...America does not elect leaders..they provide theatrical parrots to speak and a committee that is unelected rules..Having said that. Yes - you need a powerful well bred man to stand up to the committee - not some glory seeking - ego strutting guy that has a lust for green helicopters and total worldly success and human approval. As for the pretty factor - His wife is common and quite homely - in fact all the designer dresses in the world will not elevate her....Finally ----If every speech he spoke was of his own mind then I would say hail to the new king - but he is a pin headed parrot. Thank God the world did not have TV during WW2. I mean really, Winston had face for radio and fortunately was an able speaker able to marshall the English language and take it to war. In todays worlf of looks matter he would have been discounted for his pugish looks and would be judged by his wifes mug also. Gosh you you sure are judgemental. But you good looking people have that right I guess. Quote
bush_cheney2004 Posted January 24, 2009 Report Posted January 24, 2009 Looks like George Bush got it right...twice: ...in 2001 http://video.aol.com/video-detail/george-w...cid=VIDURVNWS01 ....and in 2005 http://cosmos.bcst.yahoo.com/up/player/pop...16&src=news Quote Economics trumps Virtue.
Oleg Bach Posted January 24, 2009 Author Report Posted January 24, 2009 Thank God the world did not have TV during WW2. I mean really, Winston had face for radio and fortunately was an able speaker able to marshall the English language and take it to war. In todays worlf of looks matter he would have been discounted for his pugish looks and would be judged by his wifes mug also. Gosh you you sure are judgemental. But you good looking people have that right I guess. Winstons face emulated power - and faith - drunk or sober..he had character and was a MAN - Obama is a little boy that has been exaulted to do the dirty work of crooks. You can tell a lot about the image of a person - nature and genetics are specific - if it looks like a duck it is a duck. Obama is a child - a very immature and ambitious boy who craves a pat on the head. It's not so much about classic good looks it's about substance - Obama has none. Quote
bush_cheney2004 Posted January 24, 2009 Report Posted January 24, 2009 ....Obama is a child - a very immature and ambitious boy who craves a pat on the head. It's not so much about classic good looks it's about substance - Obama has none. Well, it would appear that President Obama presents a very stern face when queried by impertinent reporters ! This is going to be fun..... Quote Economics trumps Virtue.
Oleg Bach Posted January 24, 2009 Author Report Posted January 24, 2009 Well, it would appear that President Obama presents a very stern face when queried by impertinent reporters ! This is going to be fun..... Oooooooh the STERN face - such authority - yes this is going to be fun - first we have the monkey boy George double yah...now we have the professional and very successful student Obama - boy I bet his white parents cheered when they saw his report cards - "Look Martha --- little Hussein got a one hundered percent in his math exam...told yah we could train him to be as accomplished as a white boy...wait till I write my theisis and present it to the guys at the club - my experiment worked!" Don't forget the acting coaches and those shrewed buggers who are busy coaching the boy on public speaking - wonder how many lessons he took - I'm just not impressed with President Biden ---getting this cure little pale black boy as bait to capture the emotions of America ---seeing the white guys have no charisma or the ablity to invoke emotion - seeing the bastards have none - and that fact is what makes America Great - the abilty to keep that inherited stiff uppper British lip stiff while they kick the dog and take the money.. Quote
Muddy Posted January 24, 2009 Report Posted January 24, 2009 Oleg you have every right to make disparaging remarks like above,but you are only showing your short comings when it comes to character. Not Obamas! Ones countenance does not denote intelligence. Quote
Radsickle Posted January 24, 2009 Report Posted January 24, 2009 (edited) In American lore, it's important that the sentences be repeated properly. The Chief Justice fumbled the phrase. Obama patiently waited for the man to correct himself. Apparently, Obama didn't want this guy to be a chief justice in the first place. They re-did the passage later on, just to be sure it was said properly. Edited January 24, 2009 by Radsickle Quote
sharkman Posted January 24, 2009 Report Posted January 24, 2009 Ahh, but it was Obama who misspoke first. He started repeating the first line before Roberts had paused, speaking over Roberts, which seemed to throw him off. Quote
Oleg Bach Posted January 24, 2009 Author Report Posted January 24, 2009 Is it really of any consequence? You know what I would like to see....a STATESMEN. Someone who makes statements..there OWN words..and write their OWN speeches - I am sick of supposed leaders who are nothing but actors. Quote
bush_cheney2004 Posted January 24, 2009 Report Posted January 24, 2009 Is it really of any consequence? Not any more, since the oath was taken again correctly with witnesses. Others argue that the 20th Amendment to the US Constitution makes the point moot. Obama is no stranger to constitutional challenges (i.e. US born citizen). http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oath_of_offic...e_United_States Quote Economics trumps Virtue.
Oleg Bach Posted January 24, 2009 Author Report Posted January 24, 2009 Not any more, since the oath was taken again correctly with witnesses. Others argue that the 20th Amendment to the US Constitution makes the point moot. Obama is no stranger to constitutional challenges (i.e. US born citizen).http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oath_of_offic...e_United_States Constitutions like husbands should never be challenged - nothing worse than a contentious wife other than a contention or competition with the consitution....some call it a "challenge" I call any tampering with the law an attack. What a system you have down their - millions of people and not one good old fashioned leader - just a committee that inhances the lust of crimminals and supports their ventures ....American administration is akin to none. Quote
bush_cheney2004 Posted January 24, 2009 Report Posted January 24, 2009 ....What a system you have down their - millions of people and not one good old fashioned leader - just a committee that inhances the lust of crimminals and supports their ventures ....American administration is akin to none. This is by design...we shall have no kings or queens.....kicked yours in the ass a long time ago. It has worked out very well. Quote Economics trumps Virtue.
Oleg Bach Posted January 24, 2009 Author Report Posted January 24, 2009 This is by design...we shall have no kings or queens.....kicked yours in the ass a long time ago. It has worked out very well. Worked out well? For who - about 9% of the population and the rest are subjugated - get real there Cheneybush....I saw Bush suck up to Blair and I saw Bush rejected by Blair who represents the Queen - The highest social class that can be obtained in the states is to have tea with the Queen - and Bush and Cheney were rejected - because they are bandits and the Queen expects that her friends be gentlemen and honourable - not weapons of mass destruction along with the pilfering of pension funds by ----well I won't mention any names. Quote
bush_cheney2004 Posted January 24, 2009 Report Posted January 24, 2009 Worked out well? For who - about 9% of the population and the rest are subjugated - get real there Cheneybush....I saw Bush suck up to Blair and I saw Bush rejected by Blair who represents the Queen .... We've already had this discussion...If I am "subjugated", please "keep on using me....until they use me up". Plasma or LCD? Quote Economics trumps Virtue.
Oleg Bach Posted January 24, 2009 Author Report Posted January 24, 2009 We've already had this discussion...If I am "subjugated", please "keep on using me....until they use me up".Plasma or LCD? Being used is fine as long as they pay you. Sending off duped soldiers to extend the empire with the promise of giving the poor ghetto kid a "free education" - that consists of computer geekery...and in the end the only education they can look at and see is that missing foot. YOU - my dear friend are not subjugated - as am I not - only because of our level of awareness - we simply refuse to be slaves...but others are not as brave or smart - and I feel sorry for them -- It's like finding it legal and honourable to kick a dog - only because the dog can not tell. Plasma? Maybe your Orwellian wall set that displays a meadow with a mountain stream is a dis-service to you ---- Do you really want to partake in the fantacy that the nation is clean and environmentaly sound...Much like black sitcoms that show blacks to be rich and happy ---it's an illusion and a dis-service to humanity...but I guess as I leaned in the courts - YOU can smack and abuse the citizens as long as they don't know they are being abused - that makes them fair game... I can't do it...I was not brought up that way ---and that is why I as a young man was kicked out of the most powerful corporate family in Canada. Here is why I was given the boot ----THEY KNEW I WAS NOT THE KIND OF MAN TO HARM OTHERS ON MASS IN ORDER TO LIVE THE GOOD LIFE....SO I HAD TO GO ----BOOT! right to the bottom of the heap where I have been now in exile for 30 years ----- I hate the status quo...they are jerks. Quote
bush_cheney2004 Posted January 24, 2009 Report Posted January 24, 2009 Being used is fine as long as they pay you. Sending off duped soldiers to extend the empire with the promise of giving the poor ghetto kid a "free education" - that consists of computer geekery...and in the end the only education they can look at and see is that missing foot. YOU - my dear friend are not subjugated - as am I not - only because of our level of awareness - we simply refuse to be slaves...but others are not as brave or smart - and I feel sorry for them "They" don't want or need to insights or pity....choices are far better than your judgements for "them". ...it's an illusion and a dis-service to humanity...but I guess as I leaned in the courts - YOU can smack and abuse the citizens as long as they don't know they are being abused - that makes them fair game... I can't do it...I was not brought up that way ---and that is why I as a young man was kicked out of the most powerful corporate family in Canada. Easy come...easy go. Here is why I was given the boot ----THEY KNEW I WAS NOT THE KIND OF MAN TO HARM OTHERS ON MASS IN ORDER TO LIVE THE GOOD LIFE....SO I HAD TO GO ----BOOT! right to the bottom of the heap where I have been now in exile for 30 years ----- I hate the status quo...they are jerks. If you wanted a place on their ladder to begin with, then you also made a choice. Quote Economics trumps Virtue.
Oleg Bach Posted January 24, 2009 Author Report Posted January 24, 2009 "They" don't want or need to insights or pity....choices are far better than your judgements for "them".Easy come...easy go. If you wanted a place on their ladder to begin with, then you also made a choice. There was no choice for me...I was brought up by parents that had suffered war and revolution...old school orthodox Christians ....I really did not have a clue that the world was so wicked - my mother protected us from that crap...I was in love --- and they ate me alive and left me to die...and I must say - They enjoyed my suffering..AS for choices ---- uniformed decisions are NOT choices - they are called duppings. Or is that dumplings? Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.