CANADIEN Posted July 17, 2008 Report Share Posted July 17, 2008 (edited) Basically because they do not share the same heritage/language and shared values relating to the historical relationship between Great Britain and the U.S. and other English speaking countries. Writiing drivel the way you do is not the norm. Should we conclude you're not white? Edited July 17, 2008 by CANADIEN Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CANADIEN Posted July 17, 2008 Report Share Posted July 17, 2008 Finally you have posted something of significance. Since nobody on this planet is perfect, conclusion is... nobody is white Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CANADIEN Posted July 17, 2008 Report Share Posted July 17, 2008 (edited) These countries as I posted previously "pertain to the Anglosphere to various degrees". You don't have to be of the White race to be part of and enjoy the benefits of the White Anglosphere culture. And you will not find a definition of the 'White culture of the Anglosphere' as I used that terminology to differentiate it from other White cultures. Jamaica is a colony of Britain, is mainly Christian and has some British traditions. India is a former colony of Britain but more importantly was welcomed into the Anglosphere by George W. Bush. Which tells us what the "Anglosphere" really is. A term used by the Bush administration for political purpose, with little consideration for what culture is. And jamaica is a sovereign country... we all know that facts are not your specialty, but try them once in a while. Edited July 17, 2008 by CANADIEN Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CANADIEN Posted July 17, 2008 Report Share Posted July 17, 2008 Are you sticking with Jamaica being a colony of Britain?So we can add an arthritic grasp of history to your list of intellectual ailments? And, it is a full member of the United Nations, which colonies cannot be. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CANADIEN Posted July 17, 2008 Report Share Posted July 17, 2008 I did say the U.K. is not independent. And we already know it is in a personal union with 15 other countries What I said was: The U.K. technically is in a personal union not only with 15 other countries but with itself as it cannot do what it wishes since itself is a creation of four separate entities, each with powers if their own. BTW- provide a link that proves the U.K. has a single written constitution. I know that isn't what you said and don't come back with the Magna Carta, Bill of Rights etc. because this is not a single written constitution. It has no single written constitution. That the United Kingdom has no written constitution has no bearing on it being a sovereign (independent) country. Since (like Jamaica) it is a member of the UN, which only independent countries can be, it is, indeed, independent from the other countries they share a queen with. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CANADIEN Posted July 17, 2008 Report Share Posted July 17, 2008 Back to Sir Paul in Quebec. Looks like Leafless is not the only who doesn't want to see a British singer in Quebec City this summer... A group of Quebec politicians and artists oppose his show because it "proves the federal government is Canadianizing the 400th anniversary event" (with a BRITISH singer? ). Others don't want him there because his lyrics are in English. They need to get a life. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
M.Dancer Posted July 17, 2008 Report Share Posted July 17, 2008 Back to Sir Paul in Quebec.Looks like Leafless is not the only who doesn't want to see a British singer in Quebec City this summer... A group of Quebec politicians and artists oppose his show because it "proves the federal government is Canadianizing the 400th anniversary event" (with a BRITISH singer? ). Others don't want him there because his lyrics are in English. They need to get a life. My daughter who will be starting grade four French ommersion believes her and her friends invented Franglais....I didn't have the heart to tell hert I invented it. Michelle, ma belle.These are words that go together well, My Michelle. Michelle, ma belle. Sont les mots qui vont très bien ensemble, Très bien ensemble. I love you, I love you, I love you. That's all I want to say. Until I find a way I will say the only words I know that You'll understand. Michelle, ma belle. Sont les mots qui vont très bien ensemble, Très bien ensemble. I need to, I need to, I need to. I need to make you see, Oh, what you mean to me. Until I do I'm hoping you will Know what I mean. I love you... I want you, I want you, I want you. I think you know by now I'll get to you somehow. Until I do I'm telling you so You'll understand. Michelle, ma belle. Sont les mots qui vont très bien ensemble, Très bien ensemble. I will say the only words I know that You'll understand, my Michelle. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CANADIEN Posted July 17, 2008 Report Share Posted July 17, 2008 (edited) Now I know why Leafless doesn't like Sir Paul. He has a song with French words in it (actually, he has two... he did an horrible one in the 90's, which I think even he does not want to hear about these days) Edited July 17, 2008 by CANADIEN Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
guyser Posted July 17, 2008 Report Share Posted July 17, 2008 Back to Sir Paul in Quebec.Looks like Leafless is not the only who doesn't want to see a British singer in Quebec City this summer... In the end, Leafless may be the only one who doesnt want to see Sir Paul. They are expecting 200,000 to show up. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
g_bambino Posted July 17, 2008 Report Share Posted July 17, 2008 I did say the U.K. is not independent. And we already know it is in a personal union with 15 other countries What I said was: The U.K. technically is in a personal union not only with 15 other countries but with itself as it cannot do what it wishes since itself is a creation of four separate entities, each with powers if their own. I know you did not say the UK is not independentl; hence, I said that if I was correct in my reading of your words, you would have to say that the UK is not independent. I'm not sure you're really clear on what you're trying to say, anyway. I think this especially because of what you've just claimed above. The UK itself is not a personal union; it exists under a single crown. Even though there are devolved parliaments in Scotland, Northern Ireland, and Wales, the situation isn't even the same there as for Canada and its provinces; all the constituent countries of the UK remain under the authority of the parliament at Westminster. BTW- provide a link that proves the U.K. has a single written constitution.I know that isn't what you said and don't come back with the Magna Carta, Bill of Rights etc. because this is not a single written constitution. It has no single written constitution. Why ask me to prove what I didn't say? Besides, the point of this discussion was for you to affirm that Jamaica is not an independent kingdom. We're all still waiting... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
g_bambino Posted July 17, 2008 Report Share Posted July 17, 2008 There is no sense in denying anything.The imperialist were in fact White and successful. So what? Are you denying some groups posses the ability to be more successful then other groups. Indeed, so nobody is denying anything, except you, it seems, when it comes to the question actually put to you: Do you then believe that Caucasians possess a greater ability to develop an advanced culture? I will take it, though, from your above statement that you do. Interesting, when one considers what "a belief that race is the primary determinant of human traits and capacities and that racial differences produce an inherent superiority of a particular race" defines. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leafless Posted July 17, 2008 Author Report Share Posted July 17, 2008 Indeed, so nobody is denying anything, except you, it seems, when it comes to the question actually put to you: Do you then believe that Caucasians possess a greater ability to develop an advanced culture? I will take it, though, from your above statement that you do. Interesting, when one considers what "a belief that race is the primary determinant of human traits and capacities and that racial differences produce an inherent superiority of a particular race" defines. I believe Whites posses the ability and perseverance to achieve important linked objectives. Name me an advanced country/race that has achieved the same level of success as the White race. The trick is to initially develop a society that harbours all the objectives of a successful society. No one has developed this type of society other than the White race who then educated and shared their success with the less fortunate. Anyone with half a brain can learn anything that is taught and this is proven at the expense of the White race. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leafless Posted July 17, 2008 Author Report Share Posted July 17, 2008 I know you did not say the UK is not independentl; hence, I said that if I was correct in my reading of your words, you would have to say that the UK is not independent. I'm not sure you're really clear on what you're trying to say, anyway. I think this especially because of what you've just claimed above. The UK itself is not a personal union; it exists under a single crown. Even though there are devolved parliaments in Scotland, Northern Ireland, and Wales, the situation isn't even the same there as for Canada and its provinces; all the constituent countries of the UK remain under the authority of the parliament at Westminster.Why ask me to prove what I didn't say? So you are saying the U.K. is a fully sovereign country? Besides, the point of this discussion was for you to affirm that Jamaica is not an independent kingdom. We're all still waiting... Jamaica, like Canada is a slave to the Queen. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AngusThermopyle Posted July 17, 2008 Report Share Posted July 17, 2008 Jamaica, like Canada is a slave to the Queen. She sure is a harsh and demanding slave mistress. You sound like a hard core Quebecois. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leafless Posted July 17, 2008 Author Report Share Posted July 17, 2008 She sure is a harsh and demanding slave mistress. You sound like a hard core Quebecois. Don't kid yourself. Quebecers love the Queen as it gives PM's the power of a king. To-day due to the abuse of federal power, relating to cultural and immigration concerns, I would like to see Canada a republic so Canadians would have more control on what the feds can do. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
daniel Posted July 18, 2008 Report Share Posted July 18, 2008 In the end, Leafless may be the only one who doesnt want to see Sir Paul. They are expecting 200,000 to show up. But that 200,000 includes the guy who doesn't want Sir Paul to show up. He's going to hand him a letter of protest. I wonder if it will be in English or French. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
guyser Posted July 18, 2008 Report Share Posted July 18, 2008 But that 200,000 includes the guy who doesn't want Sir Paul to show up. He's going to hand him a letter of protest. I wonder if it will be in English or French. probably crayon....with mispelled words. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CANADIEN Posted July 18, 2008 Report Share Posted July 18, 2008 In the end, Leafless may be the only one who doesnt want to see Sir Paul. They are expecting 200,000 to show up. Actually, if I was lving in Quebec City, and working Monday morning, I would not go either. People will still be on the Plains trying to get back home by 4 am Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CANADIEN Posted July 18, 2008 Report Share Posted July 18, 2008 (edited) Don't kid yourself. Quebecers love the Queen as it gives PM's the power of a king. To-day due to the abuse of federal power, relating to cultural and immigration concerns, I would like to see Canada a republic so Canadians would have more control on what the feds can do. The Queen is loved so much in Quebec she hasn't been invited to visit there since the 1976 Olympics. And not two months ago you were singing the praises of the Monarchy and how Canadian it is. We already knew you don't know what you are talking about. So that you contradict yourself is no surprise Edited July 18, 2008 by CANADIEN Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leafless Posted July 18, 2008 Author Report Share Posted July 18, 2008 The Queen is loved so much in Quebec she hasn't been invited to visit there since the 1976 Olympics. Many Quebecers hate her but love the Monarchy for the system of government Quebec uses against Canada. We already knew you don't what you are talking about. So that you contradict yourself is no surprise You must be French. You and your gang. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leafless Posted July 18, 2008 Author Report Share Posted July 18, 2008 probably crayon....with mispelled words. Does this belong to you guyser. I found it in my computer. Your name is in it. <html><head><meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8"><title>Google</title><style>body,td,a,p,.h{font-family:arial,sans-serif}.h{font-size:20px}.h{color:#3366cc}.q{color:#00c}.ts td{padding:0}.ts{border-collapse:collapse}.lnc:link,.lnc:visited{color:#00c}.pgtab,.pgtab:hover,.pgtabseected,.pgtabside{text-align:center;text-decoration:none;color:#00c;display:block;height:27px;float:left;overflow:hidden; ackground:url(/intl/ja/images/productlinktabs.png) no-repeat;padding-top:8px}.pgtab{width:130px;background-position:-274px 0}.pgtab:hover{width:130px;background-position:-144px 0}.pgtabselected{width:144px}.pgtabside{width:3px;background-position:-404px 0}.iconl{overflow:hidden;height:px;width:px;position:relative}#gbar{height:22px; adding-left:2px}.gbh,.gbd{border-top:1px solid #c9d7f1;font-size:1px}.gbh{height:0;position:absolute;top:24px;width:100%}#gbi,#gbs{background:#fff;left:0;position:absolute;top:24px;visibility:hidden;z-index:1000}#gbi{border:1px solid;border-color:#c9d7f1 #36c #36c #a2bae7;z-index:1001}#guser{padding-bottom:7px !important}#gbar,#guser{font-size:13px;padding-top:1px !important}@media all{.gb1,.gb3{height:22px;margin-right:.73em;vertical-align:top}#gbar{float:left}}.gb2{display:block;padding:.2em .5em}a.gb1,a.gb2,a.gb3{color:#00c !important}.gb2,.gb3{text-decoration:none}a.gb2:hover{background:#36c;color:#fff !important}</style><script>window.google={kEI:"f4V_SMbjG46MgAL6i5jMCA",kEXPI:"17259,17735,18471",kHL:"en"}; function sf(){document.f.q.focus()} window.clk=function(b,c,d,e,f,g){if(document.images){var a=encodeURIComponent||escape;(new Image).src="/url?sa=T"+(c?"&oi="+a©:"")+(d?"&cad="+a(d):"")+"&ct="+a(e)+"&cd="+a(f)+(b?"&url="+a(b.replace(/#.*/,"")).replace(/\+/g,"%2B"):"")+"&ei=f4V_SMbjG46MgAL6i5jMCA"+g}return true}; window.gbar={};(function(){var b=window.gbar,f,h;b.qs=function(a){var c=window.encodeURIComponent&&(document.forms[0].q||"").value;if©a.href=a.href.replace(/([?&])q=[^&]*|$/,function(i,g){return(g||"&")+"q="+encodeURIComponent©})};function j(a,c){a.visibility=h?"hidden":"visible";a.left=c+"px"}b.tg=function(a){a=a||window.event;var c=0,i,g=window.navExtra,d=document.getElementById("gbi"),e=a.target||a.srcElement;a.cancelBubble=true;if(!f){f=document.createElement(Array.every||window.createPopup?"iframe":"div");f.frameBorder="0";f.src="#";d.parentNode.appendChild(f).id="gbs";if(g)for(i in g)d.insertBefore(g,d.firstChild).className="gb2";document.onclick=b.close}if(e.className!="gb3")e=e.parentNode;do c+=e.offsetLeft;while(e=e.offsetParent);j(d.style,c);f.style.width=d.offsetWidth "px";f.style.height=d.offsetHeight+"px";j(f.style,c);h=!h};b.close=function(a){h&&b.tg(a)}})();</script></head><body bgcolor=#ffffff text=#000000 link=#0000cc vlink=#551a8b alink=#ff0000 onload="sf();if(document.images){new Image().src='/images/nav_logo3.png'}" topmargin=3 marginheight=3><div id=gbar><nobr><b class=gb1>Web</b> <a href="http://images.google.ca/imghp?hl=en&tab=wi" onclick=gbar.qs(this) class=gb1>Images</a> <a href="http://maps.google.ca/maps?hl=en&tab=wl" onclick=gbar.qs(this) class=gb1>Maps</a> <a href="http://news.google.ca/nwshp?hl=en&tab=wn" onclick=gbar.qs(this) class=gb1>News</a> <a href="http://video.google.ca/?hl=en&tab=wv" onclick=gbar.qs(this) class=gb1>Video</a> <a href="http://mail.google.com/mail/?hl=en&tab=wm" class=gb1>Gmail</a> <a href="http://www.google.ca/intl/en/options/" onclick="this.blur();gbar.tg(event);return !1" class=gb3><u>more</u> <small>▼</small></a><div id=gbi><a></a> <a href="http://groups.google.ca/grphp?hl=en&tab=wg" onclick=gbar.qs(this) class=gb2>Groups</a> <a href="http://books.google.ca/bkshp?hl=en&tab=wp" onclick=gbar.qs(this) class=gb2>Books</a> <a href="http://scholar.google.ca/schhp?hl=en&tab=ws" onclick=gbar.qs(this) class=gb2>Scholar</a> <a href="http://finance.google.ca/finance?hl=en&tab=we" onclick=gbar.qs(this) class=gb2>Finance</a> <a href="http://blogsearch.google.ca/?hl=en&tab=wb" onclick=gbar.qs(this) class=gb2>Blogs</a> <div class=gb2><div class=gbd></div></div><a></a> <a href="http://www.google.com/calendar/render?hl=en&tab=wc" class=gb2>Calendar</a> <a href="http://picasaweb.google.ca/home?hl=en&tab=wq" onclick=gbar.qs(this) class=gb2>Photos</a> <a href="http://docs.google.com/?hl=en&tab=wo" class=gb2>Documents</a> <div class=gb2><div class=gbd></div></div><a></a> <a href="http://www.google.ca/intl/en/options/" class=gb2>even more »</a> </div></nobr></div><div class=gbh style=left:0></div><div class=gbh style=right:0></div><div align=right id=guser style="font-size:84%;padding:0 0 4px" width=100%><nobr><a href="/url?sa=p&pref=ig&pval=3&q=http://www.google.ca/ig%3Fhl%3Den%26source%3Diglk&usg=AFQjCNG2Kt7TgMZuV7Fl3FeeTOmTWMvggA">iGoogle</a> | <a href="https://www.google.com/accounts/Login?continue=http://www.google.ca/&hl=en">Sign in</a></nobr></div><center><br clear=all id=lgpd><img alt="Google" height=110 src="/intl/en_ca/images/logo.gif" width=276><br><br><form action="/search" name=f><table cellpadding=0 cellspacing=0><tr valign=top><td width=25%> </td><td align=center nowrap><input name=hl type=hidden value=en><input maxlength=2048 name=q size=55 title="Google Search" value=""><br><input name=btnG type=submit value="Google Search"><input name=btnI type=submit value="I'm Feeling Lucky"></td><td nowrap width=25%><font size=-2>  <a href=/advanced_search?hl=en>Advanced Search</a><br>  <a href=/preferences?hl=en>Preferences</a><br>  <a href=/language_tools?hl=en>Language Tools</a></font></td></tr><tr><td align=center colspan=3><font size=-1><span style="text-align:left">Search: <input id=all type=radio name=meta value="" checked><label for=all> the web </label><input id=cty type=radio name=meta value="cr=countryCA"><label for=cty> pages from Canada </label></span></font></td></tr></table></form><br><font size=-1>Google.ca offered in: <a href="http://www.google.ca/setprefs?sig=0_5o4DC0ZZO-SyjxkH6qd1wXJ6vwk=&hl=fr">Français</a> </font><br><br><br><font size=-1><a href="/intl/en/ads/">Advertising Programs</a> - <a href="/services/">Business Solutions</a> - <a href="/intl/en/about.html">About Google</a> - <a href=http://www.google.com/ncr>Go to Google.com</a><span id=hp style="behavior:url(#default#homepage)"></span><script>(function() {try{var a="http://www.google.ca/",b=document.getElementById("hp"),c=b.isHomePage(a);_rptHp=function(){(new Image).src="/gen_204?sa=X&ct=mgyhpbg&cd="+(c?1:0)};if(!c)document.write('<p><a href=/mgyhp.html onClick=document.getElementById("hp").setHomepage("'+a+'");_rptHp();>Make Google Your Homepage!</a><br><br>');(new Image).src="/gen_204?atyp=i&ghp="+(c?"t":"f")+"bg";; }catch(z){}})();</script></font><p><font size=-2>©2008 - <a href="/intl/en/privacy.html">Privacy</a></font></p></center></body></html> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CANADIEN Posted July 18, 2008 Report Share Posted July 18, 2008 Many Quebecers hate her but love the Monarchy for the system of government Quebec uses against Canada. You must be French. You and your gang. Yep... Quebecers love the Monarchy so muuuch they changed the name of Victoria Day because it reminds them of the Monarchy. Try to get a clue once in a while. And we all remember how not that long ago you were praising British institutions (which includes the system of government we have in Canada), and that you were admitting that I am a Canadian. Keep contradicting yourself Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leafless Posted July 18, 2008 Author Report Share Posted July 18, 2008 Yep... Quebecers love the Monarchy so muuuch they changed the name of Victoria Day because it reminds them of the Monarchy. Try to get a clue once in a while. I thought Quebecers dumped religion. Go figure why they would honour some patron saint who through their own admission don't why this is. But legend says it was adopted it as the name of the national society of French-Canadians. What a slap in the face to Canada and the Queen. It is not known why St-Jean-Baptiste came to be considered the patron saint of French Canada. One legend has it that a great many French-Canadians bearing that given name persuaded the journalist and patriot Ludger Duvernay to adopt it as the name of the national society of French-Canadians which he founded in 1834. http://www.thecanadianencyclopedia.com/ind...s=U1ARTU0003085 And we all remember how not that long ago you were praising British institutions (which includes the system of government we have in Canada), and that you were admitting that I am a Canadian.Keep contradicting yourself You are just confused with anarchy and treason and have no respect for English speaking Canadians and will try anything to justify your twisted position. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CANADIEN Posted July 18, 2008 Report Share Posted July 18, 2008 I thought Quebecers dumped religion. Go figure why they would honour some patron saint who through their own admission don't why this is. But legend says it was adopted it as the name of the national society of French-Canadians. What a slap in the face to Canada and the Queen. http://www.thecanadianencyclopedia.com/ind...s=U1ARTU0003085 You are just confused with anarchy and treason and have no respect for English speaking Canadians and will try anything to justify your twisted position. So, French-speaking Canadians managed to slap the Queen in the face BEFORE she became Queen and Canada BEFORE Confederation. And I will your position non-sense and a pile of m"nure, but anarchy or treason is a bit much, isn't it? But your lack of respect you show towards other English-speaking Canadians throught the way you use the English language is at least entertaining. So is the way you twist your own non-sense to the point of yourself do not say what you're saying "Monarchy is a great thing... no it's the source of our problems... don't you dare speak ill of the Monarchy" "You're French... No you're Canadian... No you're French" Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AngusThermopyle Posted July 18, 2008 Report Share Posted July 18, 2008 (edited) But your lack of respect you show towards other English-speaking Canadians throught the way you use the English language is at least entertaining. So is the way you twist your own non-sense to the point of yourself do not say what you're saying Does anyone else see the magnificent irony inherent in these quotes? Edited July 18, 2008 by AngusThermopyle Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.