WarBicycle Posted April 17, 2008 Report Posted April 17, 2008 (edited) Father and son banned from council swimming pool for not being Muslims It would be interesting to know if the staff member was a Muslim. EDIT: The re-copied article was DELETED by the moderator. The quoted text in the Opening Post was different from the linked text. The title was changed to Non-muslims barred from swimming lessons in British leisure center to be more informative of the subject matter. The original ambiguous title was Give 'em an inch and they'll take a mile. Edited April 18, 2008 by Charles Anthony Quote
M.Dancer Posted April 17, 2008 Report Posted April 17, 2008 Can't say for sure whether you are for this or against this since you only graced us with a C/P.... ...but in any case it nseems that the decision is in error. But a leisure centre spokesman said staff were out of order to refuse people entry for being non-Muslim. He said: "The member of staff the user spoke with at the time was mistaken when referring to the session as Muslim only. "The men's modesty session is not a private hire and is, therefore, open to the public. Muslim men and others can attend. "Staff cannot ask your religion on entrance and you won't be refused entry if you don't appear to be Muslim." A spokesman for Hackney Council said: "None of Hackney's leisure centres have religiously segregated swimming sessions in their public timetables. "In common with most public swimming facilities, there are single sex sessions, and this session was men only. "The member of staff in this situation made a mistake... Hackney Council would wish to apologise to any member of the public who was given incorrect information." Quote RIGHT of SOME, LEFT of OTHERS If it is a choice between them and us, I choose us
M.Dancer Posted April 17, 2008 Report Posted April 17, 2008 By the way, it is against forum rules to post the full article and as well, not to offer comment. Quote RIGHT of SOME, LEFT of OTHERS If it is a choice between them and us, I choose us
Melanie_ Posted April 17, 2008 Report Posted April 17, 2008 WB - This was an error on the part of the employee of the pool, so I'm not sure what your point is. Quote For to be free is not merely to cast off one's chains, but to live in a way that respects and enhances the freedom of others. Nelson Mandela
WarBicycle Posted April 17, 2008 Author Report Posted April 17, 2008 I am not religious, but there have been numerous incidents reported where Muslims have taken over communal prayer rooms at airports and universities and refused entry to other faiths. Quote
Jerry Galinda Posted April 17, 2008 Report Posted April 17, 2008 By the way, it is against forum rules to post the full article and as well, not to offer comment. And what's your opinion about problem described by article ? Quote
Melanie_ Posted April 17, 2008 Report Posted April 17, 2008 I am not religious, but there have been numerous incidents reported where Muslims have taken over communal prayer rooms at airports and universities and refused entry to other faiths. But that's not what happened here. Even if there were 1000 Muslim men there, the pool was supposed to be open to all. Quote For to be free is not merely to cast off one's chains, but to live in a way that respects and enhances the freedom of others. Nelson Mandela
M.Dancer Posted April 17, 2008 Report Posted April 17, 2008 And what's your opinion about problem described by article ? I agree with spokeperson from Hackney. Quote RIGHT of SOME, LEFT of OTHERS If it is a choice between them and us, I choose us
WarBicycle Posted April 17, 2008 Author Report Posted April 17, 2008 (edited) Imagine the outcry from the Muslim community had the "modesty session" been for Anglicans only. A separate session for men, women, or children is understandable; however, considering this is a publicly funded amenity discrimination on the grounds of religion is illegal. Had someone prevented a Muslim from entering the pool they probably would have been held accountable. Edited April 17, 2008 by WarBicycle Quote
M.Dancer Posted April 17, 2008 Report Posted April 17, 2008 Imagine the outcry from the Muslim community had the "modesty session" been for Anglicans only. A separate session for men, women, or children is understandable; however, considering this is a publicly funded amenity discrimination on the grounds of religion is illegal. Had someone prevented a Muslim from entering the pool they probably would have been held accountable. I imagine the clerk will be held accountable. Quote RIGHT of SOME, LEFT of OTHERS If it is a choice between them and us, I choose us
WarBicycle Posted April 17, 2008 Author Report Posted April 17, 2008 UK Muslim Airport Porters Refuse to Handle Israeli Luggage The above link is another example of Muslims using their religion to take advantage of a situation; they've also refused to allow seeing eye dogs into their cabs, refused passengers carrying alcohol, and refused to handle alcohol at grocery checkouts. Quote
Melanie_ Posted April 17, 2008 Report Posted April 17, 2008 UK Muslim Airport Porters Refuse to Handle Israeli Luggage The above link is another example of Muslims using their religion to take advantage of a situation; they've also refused to allow seeing eye dogs into their cabs, refused passengers carrying alcohol, and refused to handle alcohol at grocery checkouts. No, WB, it isn't another example, because your first example was of a clerical error, not a Muslim plot. But I have a hard time believing a story that starts out... This outrageous story from e-mailer Beryl Dean has been verified and is absolutely true: and then continues on to explain how the emailer's friend went to an airport and there were no porters around and a stranger gave her an explanation based on racism and therefore all Muslims are bad! From the bio of the author of the article: As both an attorney and a frequent New York Post and Jerusalem Post columnist, Schlussel's writings/commentary on radical Islam and her legal actions against radical Islamic parties have gotten a great deal of attention -- and results. Sounds like she has an agenda. Quote For to be free is not merely to cast off one's chains, but to live in a way that respects and enhances the freedom of others. Nelson Mandela
WarBicycle Posted April 17, 2008 Author Report Posted April 17, 2008 (edited) Because she stands up to radical Islam. It's her right. It's time Muslims living in the West accept the fact that western nations have a division between religion and politics. Edited April 17, 2008 by WarBicycle Quote
Guest American Woman Posted April 17, 2008 Report Posted April 17, 2008 This outrageous story from e-mailer Beryl Dean has been verified and is absolutely true: What exactly is "absolutely true?" That the woman mentioned in the incident told her friend what she did? That the man told the woman that the porters are Muslim and wouldn't handle Israeli's luggage? Neither one of those "truths" proves that the claim about Muslims/porters is true. Furthermore, it doesn't say how the incident was "verified." Was the woman's word all that was sought to verify it, or has British Air and/or Heathrow verified it? I have a hard time believing that every porter who works for British Air is a Muslim. I also find it very difficult to believe that no other Israelis who have flown British Air have complained about this, yet this is the only story on the internet about about porters for British Air refusing to help Israelis. Seems to me if this were the case, if all Israelis flying into Heathrow on British Air were refused service by Muslim porters because of their nationality, we'd have heard about it. Quote
WarBicycle Posted April 17, 2008 Author Report Posted April 17, 2008 (edited) I have been to Heathrow twice in the past two years, just like the Toronto airport, a large percentage of its workforce is Southeast Asian. I doubt the story is untrue. Here's another example of radical Islam in the workplace. More examples here and here. Edited April 17, 2008 by WarBicycle Quote
Guest American Woman Posted April 17, 2008 Report Posted April 17, 2008 I have been to Heathrow twice in the past two years, just like the Toronto airport, a large percentage of its workforce is Southeast Asian. I doubt the story is untrue. Well, then. Since you doubt the story is untrue, guess that clinches it. There's a huge difference between "a large percentage of [Heathrow's] workforce [being] Southeast Asian and "all porters being Muslim." Your observation also provides nothing regarding any proof of the claim that was made. Fact is, your observation sort of makes this claim even more unbelievable. If there are so many Muslims working in Heathrow and Toronto and they are all refusing service to Israelis, seems to me that would be big news--- at least on the internet. Yet here we are with only one story; one example; one complaint. Here's another example of radical Islam in the workplace. Yet another example here. Wow. Two more examples of "radical Islam" involving a total of two Muslim employees. And of course one couldn't find similar examples regarding any other religion and/or people in the workforce if one were to scour the internet for such information, eh? But just curious-- what do you think of minors who work as cashiers but can't scan alcohol because of their age? Do you think all minors should be refused such jobs? Do you think they present a huge problem in the work force? Quote
WarBicycle Posted April 17, 2008 Author Report Posted April 17, 2008 Well, then. Since you doubt the story is untrue, guess that clinches it. There's a huge difference between "a large percentage of [Heathrow's] workforce [being] Southeast Asian and "all porters being Muslim." Your observation also provides nothing regarding any proof of the claim that was made. Fact is, your observation sort of makes this claim even more unbelievable. If there are so many Muslims working in Heathrow and Toronto and they are all refusing service to Israelis, seems to me that would be big news--- at least on the internet. Yet here we are with only one story; one example; one complaint. Wow. Two more examples of "radical Islam" involving a total of two Muslim employees. And of course one couldn't find similar examples regarding any other religion and/or people in the workforce if one were to scour the internet for such information, eh? But just curious-- what do you think of minors who work as cashiers but can't scan alcohol because of their age? Do you think all minors should be refused such jobs? Do you think they present a huge problem in the work force? Alcohol is a provincial jurisdiction, I've lived in four Canadian provinces and not one would permit a minor working where alcohol is being sold or served. Quote
M.Dancer Posted April 17, 2008 Report Posted April 17, 2008 Alcohol is a provincial jurisdiction, I've lived in four Canadian provinces and not one would permit a minor working where alcohol is being sold or served. Not true. Ontario and Quebec allows bussers to work at 16 in places that serve liquer Quote RIGHT of SOME, LEFT of OTHERS If it is a choice between them and us, I choose us
WarBicycle Posted April 17, 2008 Author Report Posted April 17, 2008 Not true. Ontario and Quebec allows bussers to work at 16 in places that serve liquer bussers clean up; you won't find anyone under 18 at the cash. Quote
Guest American Woman Posted April 17, 2008 Report Posted April 17, 2008 Alcohol is a provincial jurisdiction, I've lived in four Canadian provinces and not one would permit a minor working where alcohol is being sold or served. Minors work in stores where alcohol is sold in the States, and someone else has to be called to scan it. So my questions stands. Quote
jbg Posted April 18, 2008 Report Posted April 18, 2008 It would be interesting to know if the staff member was a Muslim. This nonesense has come to Canada (link to article, excerpted below): In the mid-1990s, the southern Alberta community of Brooks looked like much of small-town Canada - white and Christian. Today, thanks to the voracious labour needs of one local employer - the giant Lakeside meat-packing plant - it's one of the most diverse centres in the country: 25 per cent of its 12,000 residents are visible minorities, representing every nation in Africa and speaking 76 different languages. Mayor Don Weisbeck makes it clear that Brooks is proud of its changing face. But such massive change doesn't happen smoothly. Some locals have groused about the accommodations, including curtains at the community pool so Muslim women can swim without worrying about the gaze of men. Quote Free speech: "You can say what you want, but I don't have to lend you my megaphone." Always remember that when you are in the right you can afford to keep your temper, and when you are in the wrong you cannot afford to lose it. - J.J. Reynolds. Will the steps anyone is proposing to fight "climate change" reduce a single temperature, by a single degree, at a single location? The mantra of "world opinion" or the views of the "international community" betrays flabby and weak reasoning (link).
WarBicycle Posted April 18, 2008 Author Report Posted April 18, 2008 (edited) Muslim women cover their faces for a reason, I haven't seen many Pakistani women worthy of my gaze. Edited April 18, 2008 by WarBicycle Quote
Guest American Woman Posted April 18, 2008 Report Posted April 18, 2008 Muslim women cover their faces for a reason, I haven't seen many Pakistani women worthy of my gaze. I take it from your juvenile non-answer that it's only a problem in the workplace when another employee has to be called to do a scan for a Muslim. Quote
WarBicycle Posted April 18, 2008 Author Report Posted April 18, 2008 Minors work in stores where alcohol is sold in the States, and someone else has to be called to scan it. So my questions stands. Only if you can provide locations in the U.S. where the sale of pork is illegal. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.