Canuck E Stan Posted November 9, 2007 Report Posted November 9, 2007 CBC holds back Falun Gong film The CBC postponed the airing of a documentary about the Falun Gong spiritual movement after receiving calls from the Chinese embassy expressing concern about the film's subject matter. Peter Rowe, who wrote and directed the documentary, said a CBC executive called him late Tuesday afternoon to inform him the film would not air that evening. The executive also asked if Mr. Rowe could come to a meeting to discuss "re-editing" his documentary."It's rather surprising, because the film has been in production for about three years and was delivered to the CBC in March, so the authorities and the executives at the CBC signed off on the film quite some time ago," he said. The CBC seems more concerned about offending the Chinese and ready to bend than PM Harper when it comes to issues with the Chinese. Yet showing domestic political issues on the Fifth Estate doesn't seem to worry the CBC. What gives? Quote "Any man under 30 who is not a liberal has no heart, and any man over 30 who is not a conservative has no brains." — Winston Churchill
geoffrey Posted November 9, 2007 Report Posted November 9, 2007 The CBC management that made this decision should resign immediately. Actually, the head of the CBC needs to take responsibility and stop selling out to a communist agenda. The Board should be dismissed. There must be ABSOLUTELY ZERO tolerance for this in a public broadcaster. My tax dollars must never fund the political agenda of China. Showing factually empty pieces like Bowling for Columbine and endless anti-Bush shit flicks are fine apparently, but a well researched and produced documentary by a well respected journalist is sent back to be censored and editted so it doesn't offend the flipping Chinese? If the CBC existed during the '30s, do we think they should have censored a documentary on the human rights violations against Jews and other groups for the fear of discouraging trade with Nazi Germany? What is happening in China is a flithly display of human rights violation, religious motivated murder, torture and organ harvesting. This needs to be front page news. Especially for a country that is hosting an Olympics. I've never been so disgusted at the journalistic integrity of the CBC. It has now proven to be way overly biased towards socialist and communist viewpoints, covering up genocide as not to be offensive under the pressure of foreign governments? It's time to cut the funding. I'm sure the Chinese government will pick up the tab. Quote RealRisk.ca - (Latest Post: Prosecutors have no "Skin in the Game") --
maldon_road Posted November 9, 2007 Report Posted November 9, 2007 The CBC management that made this decision should resign immediately. Actually, the head of the CBC needs to take responsibility and stop selling out to a communist agenda. The Board should be dismissed. Here's an opportunity for the new President of the CBC to do a big time clean-up and rid the network of people who would kow-tow like this. Quote If the men do not die well it will be a black matter for the king that led them to it.
Canuck E Stan Posted November 9, 2007 Author Report Posted November 9, 2007 What is happening in China is a flithly display of human rights violation, religious motivated murder, torture and organ harvesting. This needs to be front page news. Especially for a country that is hosting an Olympics.I've never been so disgusted at the journalistic integrity of the CBC. It has now proven to be way overly biased towards socialist and communist viewpoints, covering up genocide as not to be offensive under the pressure of foreign governments? It's time to cut the funding. I'm sure the Chinese government will pick up the tab. The Olympics may the reason the CBC is bending over to the Chinese. The CBC may be fearing some sort of backlash from the Chinese when Olympic time comes....one of the CBC's big viewer draws. Quote "Any man under 30 who is not a liberal has no heart, and any man over 30 who is not a conservative has no brains." — Winston Churchill
maldon_road Posted November 9, 2007 Report Posted November 9, 2007 The Olympics may the reason the CBC is bending over to the Chinese.The CBC may be fearing some sort of backlash from the Chinese when Olympic time comes....one of the CBC's big viewer draws. So CBC stands for the Chinese Broadcasting Corporation. But cheez it's already been on the CBC - in both English and French. Bit late for them to start dropping their drawers. Quote If the men do not die well it will be a black matter for the king that led them to it.
Michael Bluth Posted November 9, 2007 Report Posted November 9, 2007 So CBC stands for the Chinese Broadcasting Corporation. But cheez it's already been on the CBC - in both English and French. Bit late for them to start dropping their drawers. Start? I'm in complete agreement with Geoff. There is no way a publicly funded broadcaster should be using tax dollars to fund the agenda of a foreign government. Quote No one has ever defeated the Liberals with a divided conservative family. - Hon. Jim Prentice
Topaz Posted November 9, 2007 Report Posted November 9, 2007 Speaking of the Olympics, one of the US Congressmen, was on Cnn the other day, and it seems China won't ALLOW Bibles to be brought in to the country when the Olympics are held. It doesn't matter what religion it is, they are banning them. So, when asked if the US gov't would allow their people to go to China , he said no, they wouldn't allow their athletics to go. So if US does ban their guys to go then what will Harper say to this? Besides that, how do people know they won't get sick over there from the air pollution and what they eat? Quote
maldon_road Posted November 9, 2007 Report Posted November 9, 2007 Speaking of the Olympics, one of the US Congressmen, was on Cnn the other day, and it seems China won't ALLOW Bibles to be brought in to the country when the Olympics are held. It doesn't matter what religion it is, they are banning them. So, when asked if the US gov't would allow their people to go to China , he said no, they wouldn't allow their athletics to go. So if US does ban their guys to go then what will Harper say to this? Besides that, how do people know they won't get sick over there from the air pollution and what they eat? What is he suggesting? Legislation prohibiting the athletes from attending? Quote If the men do not die well it will be a black matter for the king that led them to it.
Michael Hardner Posted November 9, 2007 Report Posted November 9, 2007 maldon_road - you might be too young to remember the widely boycotted olympics from 1980 and 1984. It's pretty easy, even in free countries, for governments to stop their teams from going. After all, governments provide a lot of funding to their olympians. Quote Click to learn why Climate Change is caused by HUMANS Michael Hardner
Michael Hardner Posted November 9, 2007 Report Posted November 9, 2007 maldon_road - you might be too young to remember the widely boycotted olympics from 1980 and 1984. It's pretty easy, even in free countries, for governments to stop their teams from going. After all, governments provide a lot of funding to their olympians. Also I've never been so disgusted at the journalistic integrity of the CBC. It has now proven to be way overly biased towards socialist and communist viewpoints, covering up genocide as not to be offensive under the pressure of foreign governments? It's time to cut the funding. I'm sure the Chinese government will pick up the tab. I'm pretty sure we can stop calling China communist. At this point, it's pretty much a one-party capitalist regime. Quote Click to learn why Climate Change is caused by HUMANS Michael Hardner
maldon_road Posted November 9, 2007 Report Posted November 9, 2007 maldon_road - you might be too young to remember the widely boycotted olympics from 1980 and 1984. It's pretty easy, even in free countries, for governments to stop their teams from going. After all, governments provide a lot of funding to their olympians. Different circumstances of course. As revolting as the decision about bibles is I don't think it will result in a boycott. More likely it will cause a fuss and PRC will back down. Quote If the men do not die well it will be a black matter for the king that led them to it.
geoffrey Posted November 9, 2007 Report Posted November 9, 2007 I'm pretty sure we can stop calling China communist. At this point, it's pretty much a one-party capitalist regime. Fine, replace communist in my post with brutual human rights violator. Quote RealRisk.ca - (Latest Post: Prosecutors have no "Skin in the Game") --
sharkman Posted November 9, 2007 Report Posted November 9, 2007 I don't know, wouldn't a capitalist regime allow bibles and not get freaked out over the dali lama? Just sayin'. Quote
Guest American Woman Posted November 9, 2007 Report Posted November 9, 2007 I couldn't believe China wouldn't allow Bibles to be brought in, and I was right (emphasis mine): "The U.S. Olympic Committee received confirmation from Olympic officials Wednesday that there will be no restrictions on Bibles being brought into the Olympic village in Beijing next year. USOC spokesman Darryl Seibel said the federation contacted the IOC about the news reports. Seibel said the Beijing Organizing Committee never considered any ban on Bibles." Link Quote
Moxie Posted November 9, 2007 Report Posted November 9, 2007 (edited) I don't know, wouldn't a capitalist regime allow bibles and not get freaked out over the dali lama? Just sayin'. LOL I've been following a few bloqs and the government is really cracking down on "All" religions prior to the Olympics. CBC---government sponsored Liberal Indoctornation, paid for by the taxpayer of course. Will this change? Edited November 9, 2007 by Moxie Quote Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy
guyser Posted November 10, 2007 Report Posted November 10, 2007 CBC--- paid for by the taxpayer of course. Will this change? Not likely since the approval rating is consistently very high. Lost of cash generated there too. Quote
jbg Posted November 10, 2007 Report Posted November 10, 2007 CBC holds back Falun Gong film The CBC seems more concerned about offending the Chinese and ready to bend than PM Harper when it comes to issues with the Chinese. Yet showing domestic political issues on the Fifth Estate doesn't seem to worry the CBC. What gives? Political correctness.Remember, this was the same CBC that wouldn't let the words "Jew" or "Israel" be posted on its now-defunct forums. I speak from firsthand knowlege on this since I co-sourced, along with a realtor from Peterborough, ON, the article that ran in the National Post's March 10, 2004 edition (PDF available on PM request with e-mail address) regarding this policy that wound up, regretfully, shutting those forums down. Quote Free speech: "You can say what you want, but I don't have to lend you my megaphone." Always remember that when you are in the right you can afford to keep your temper, and when you are in the wrong you cannot afford to lose it. - J.J. Reynolds. Will the steps anyone is proposing to fight "climate change" reduce a single temperature, by a single degree, at a single location? The mantra of "world opinion" or the views of the "international community" betrays flabby and weak reasoning (link).
jefferiah Posted November 10, 2007 Report Posted November 10, 2007 Not likely since the approval rating is consistently very high. Are the ratings high too? You would think they would not need tax payer funding then. Quote "Governing a great nation is like cooking a small fish - too much handling will spoil it." Lao Tzu
guyser Posted November 10, 2007 Report Posted November 10, 2007 Are the ratings high too? You would think they would not need tax payer funding then. For some things yes. HNIC is one, Mosque is another. But the funding CBC gets includes RDI, radio and all the mom and pop feeds to the netherlands, among others. Newsworld is making money as are other divisions. They get to serve places that otherwise might not get anything. Quote
jefferiah Posted November 10, 2007 Report Posted November 10, 2007 For some things yes. HNIC is one, Mosque is another. HNIC....oh you mean the Mats Sundin show. That's what my brother calls it. Because if Sundin is on the bench when Antropov scores they will find someway to link it to Sundin. You think Mosque would survive if CBC were private then? Quote "Governing a great nation is like cooking a small fish - too much handling will spoil it." Lao Tzu
guyser Posted November 11, 2007 Report Posted November 11, 2007 You think Mosque would survive if CBC were private then? Sure why not? And if they manage to sell the show outside of the country , the dollars are huge. Quote
geoffrey Posted November 13, 2007 Report Posted November 13, 2007 HNIC....oh you mean the Mats Sundin show. That's what my brother calls it. Because if Sundin is on the bench when Antropov scores they will find someway to link it to Sundin. How I hate CBC's coverage of Eastern Conference games. And yes, Mosque would be around if it were private, it is a profitable show. Quote RealRisk.ca - (Latest Post: Prosecutors have no "Skin in the Game") --
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.