Jump to content

-1=e^ipi

Member
  • Posts

    4,786
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    2

-1=e^ipi last won the day on July 5 2018

-1=e^ipi had the most liked content!

Profile Information

  • Location
    Gender: Agender. Gender roles are dumb.

Recent Profile Visitors

29,441 profile views

-1=e^ipi's Achievements

Grand Master

Grand Master (14/14)

  • First Post
  • Collaborator
  • Posting Machine Rare
  • Week One Done
  • One Month Later

Recent Badges

111

Reputation

Single Status Update

See all updates by -1=e^ipi

  1. Ploting ln GDP per capita PPP vs military expenditure as a percentage of GDP for the developed G20 countries excluding the USA (the USA is an outlier) and performing a quadratic fit suggests that GDP per capita is optimized with military expenditure is ~ 1.6% of GDP. If you take into account the loss of consumption due to higher military expenditure, then consumption is optimized when military expenditure is ~1.35% of GDP. If you consider the geographic isolation of Canada, a 1% GDP military...

    1. -1=e^ipi

      -1=e^ipi

      expenditure level seems reasonable. I see no reason Canada should commit to the 2% military expenditure NATO target. This is pretty weak empirical evidence, though better than nothing. A cross-country regression might be a good way to take into account the positive externalities associated with military expenditure.

    2. -1=e^ipi

      -1=e^ipi

      expenditure level seems reasonable. I see no reason Canada should commit to the 2% military expenditure NATO target. This is pretty weak empirical evidence, though better than nothing. A cross-country regression might be a good way to take into account the positive externalities associated with military expenditure.

×
×
  • Create New...