CANADIEN

In case you didn't realize it, I was making fun of the fact the you hate the man so much you'd use anything to criticize him. And that's what make you pathetic. What's next? Gonna check if he flosses?

What's next? Let's ask Obama which foot he puts his sock on first and if he takes more than two second to answer it let's have him impeached and thrown out of the White House? This is beyond pathetic.

Leaving aside the FACT that there is nothing artificial about Canadians requesting government services in thee Canadian language of their choice... You have just demonstrated (oh surprise) that assimilation is to be added to the long list of concepts you hve no clue about.

Facts are what is keeping my eyes wide open. You, on the other hand, are blinded by your ignorance. I thought that (according to you), English-speaking Canadians were being assimilated in the French-language minority. Make up your mind, will you?, You mean I am a French-speaking CANADIAN (something you don't even dare to deny anymore) who has the audacity not to accept to be a second class citizen in his own country. The only thing that is being proven (again) is that you do not know how to read. You make the totally absurd case that English-speaking Canadians are being assimilated by the French-speaking population. If that was the case, we would see hundreds of thousands of households in our country stop to use English in their daily life and start using French. Feel free to prove your claim any time with actual numbers.

We know what Trudeau did for the whole of Canada, which is to ensure respect for the rights of all Canadians at the federal level.

If you had been there, you would not be claiming tha t bodily fluid fly all over the place or that sickos touch children in public with the crowd doing nothing or cheering.

Sorry all for getting a bit overzealous here, but sometimes blunt language is needed.

He's openly making fun of you, you idiot.

And here are a few quotes from the man himself: http://homepages.paradise.net.nz/mischedj/ca_hitler.html Case closed.

I'll say it again... what sources? If there is already proof on the Web, please point to it.

What sources?

I would, if only to laugh at what he considers to be "sex".

Already provided a valid explanation, which you decline to even address. Not surprisingly, since it does not match your "anti obama at all cost" bent. Feel free to address it anytime.

Actually, I doubt that you even intend to be at the Pride Parade period. Considering all the cr*p we've read from you in the past about how you grew up, what you've done, your opinion about Jews, etc., that'not much of stretch.

Tell us, Shady - what box should Barack Obama have checked in the 1990 census form? Remember, there was only one choice then.

And they are pa few sites on the Net that claim the United states has never ceased being a British colony. Mr. C. is free to post the links that he says back up his claims. Doesn't me I have to consider them valid.

Actually, what we all say (including non-socialist (by your definition) like me) is that twe still have to see credible evidence of sex acts at the Toronto Gay Pride parade. And what I am adding is that the claim that bodily fluids can fly in the air and hit bystanders is stupid.

Jesus' teachings escape categories such as socliaism or capitalism. It is fundamentally about two things - love God, and love other human beings like yourself. The rest is the practical application of it. As for materialism... socialism is all about materialism.

Then don't be. BTW, it is not a game, nor an attempt at deflecting rightful criticism. It's about me (and hopefully most) Christians confronting the evils done in the past, saying they were wrong and making clear to ourselves this is not what God called us to be.

I'll stick to the use of the term in Catholic social teachings. Many people use the term in different ways, many of them distorting the concept. For Beck to apply his own understanding of the word and assume that everyone using it means the same thing, is ignorant. As I said, had he said to churchgoers to ask and get informed about what their priest/preacher mean by social justice, he would have made a valid point. He didn't, he gets hammered for it, and rightly so.

Why not? You have no hesitation in pretending to be anything but an hateful ignoramus.

Feel free to be obtuse on purpose, which is the response that one can usually expects to be. In the United States where Obama spent part of his childhood and and began his adult life, there was no such thing, from an identity point of view, as a mixed-raced person. One was Black, or one was White, period. Until 2000, census responses that included two checked boxes as racial identity would have been rejected. The society in which Barack Obama was living left him with two choices, considering himself White, or considering himself Black (actually, more like one choice, and we know which one it was). He chose to identify himself as African-American rather than mixed-race as a result of that, and that makes it as true as any self-definition that would have indcluded his dual heritage.Case clsoed. So, while an argument could be made that in the United States of 2010 Obama could, or even should, boldly go beyond the identity that history forced him to assume, your argument that he is hiding the truth or denying his heritage on his mother's side or that its somehow legitimize the idea that he hates Whites is ignorant, and tainted by your hatred of the man.

As our understanding of ourselves and our world evolves, so those our understanding of what the call of God to follow Him means. The call to love each other and to do something about poverty and hunger as always been there, and it has always meant doing something about social conditions and attitudes that cause it. That members of the Church have taken a long time to recognise it does not mean that the call is something new that came out of thin air.

The truth is what he consider himself to be. If he had checked multiple boxes, there would be an outcry from those very same people who resent him being in the White House on the sole ground that he is not 100% Caucasian. They would claim he is trying to hide the fact that he is Black. And, while I have no reason to believe that you share that view, I strongly suspect that your hatred of Obama is such that you'd find a way to argue they have a point.

Social justioe has been part of the doctrine of the Catholic Church for over a century now. And Beck did not use the term "so-called social justice", he did not ask church-goers to watch and ask what their priest/pastor means when they use the words social justice. Had he done so, his point would have been different, and more exact.