CANADIEN

They are changing employers, not kob title. And while there is something absurd in the situation, the fact remains that technically they are being laid off their work and starting a new one with another employer. They are getting nothing less, and nothing more, that what the contract they signed said they should get.

Actually, the money does belong to them by law. The only thing discusting is you calling other people pieces of shit.

Saying that Jews and Muslims killing each other would mean more Christians is not playing devil's advocate.

So anyone who calls Israel an apartheid state is an anti-Semite, wouldn't you agree? agreeing with false numbers on the extent of the Holocaust that are put forward by deniers is anti-Semitic, wouldn't you agree? Stating that Jews and arabs killing each other would be good is anti-Semitic, wouldn't you agree?

The link beteen opposition to actions of the State of Israel and anti-Semitism is a weak one at best, but you are certainly free to argue its existence. And while there is no doubt that the "the state of Israel should not exist" claim is troublesome, others has argued better than me than "The Left" is guilty more or naiveté than hatred towards the Jewish people. There is no denying though that there is anti0Semites and anti-Semitism in this country. And the anti-Semites need to to be exposed, don't you agree Mr. Canada? I am talking about those who agree with numbers put forward by Holocaust deniers, Those who claim that Jews and arabs killing each others would be a good thing. Those who speak about "Jewish bolshevik revolutions". Those people too should be exposed as the vile anti-Semites they are, don't you agree, Mr. Canada?

I did not catch that one.

I will at least grant Mr. Canada one thing. Even pointing out his own hypocrisy will not stop him from trying to convince people that he is a friend of the Jewish people. Too bad for him that nobody is fooled.

And you haven't even posted the "best".

He won't. No matter how non-sensical it is. The "one third of pedophile acts are committed by homosexuals" claim ingore two things. a) most pedophiles are attracted to children, period b -- chikd abuse committed within the family (which tends to be less reported)involves men and girls; abuse at schools, in sports, etc. tend to have boys as victims instead of girls to a large extent because there are less opportunities there for a man to be alone with a little girl.

Correction. That's twice in a row that I am pointing out your hypocrisy. You cannot have it both ways, denouncing people for saying actually less than what you have said yourself, and expect that noone will mention it. As for your so-called :argument". It is not an argument, but berely an expression of your knee-jerk hatred for "The Left". You don't like it? Too bad... for you.

You seem to be a regular attendee at the parage... And calling Israel an apartheid state is also YOUR position. Pot calling the kettle black..

deleted

You guess, indeed. And are wrong. In particular about the second sentence. But hey, never mind that the Left, or the Right, or the Centre are not monolithic blocks. Even the more naive elements of the NDP do not represent the "Left", no more than your visceral hatred of it and your own anti-semitism represent the "Right".

The number of immigrants is a problem... Yet, there more immigrants coming to Canada on a yearly basis in the early 1910's and in the mid-1950's than now... Projections from Statistics Canada are that by 2031 between 25% and 28% of the population might be foreign-born. The percentage was 22% between 1911 and 1931... And 28% is not a majority. Some will say "but immigrants from today are not the same as immigrants from them". Yet each generation of immigrant are meet with the same bigotry, generalization and misconceptions. The same things said about Afghan immigrants today were said about those from Italy 90 years ago... Whether or not we are admitting more immigrants that we can absorb, or whether or not we are carful enough about which INDIVIDUALS we let hi would be a worthy debate... if it was not hijacked by bigots and racists (amd no, I do not equate opposition to the current immigration policies with bigotry and racism).

Shame on you... you wrote what I was about to write, and even better. JustMe... If those things are so wrong when happening elsewhere (and they are), why do you want them to happen here?

Makes sense.

Not quite. Interesting history of the swastika, including how the Nazis adopted it, at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Swastika#Historical_use_in_the_East.

The primary one, that any criticism of Israel is anti-Semitic. But go, make everyone's day. Call Bonam an anti-Semite for his criticism of Israel delay in defending itself.

Your primary fact, that criticism of Israel is anti-Semitic by nature, is blatlantly non-sensical. Others have proven that already. What I am proving on top of that is that you are in no position to call anyone an anti-Semite after some of the stuff you've posted on this site in the past. Call it an attack ad hominem or whatever you want, that FACT will not change.

And I thought you were Roman Catholic... Gotta find some quotes again *g* Apart from a few weeks during the flu scare last fall, parishioners in most parishes of the Roman Cathloci Archdiocese of Toronto have had taken Communion with wine, and still do.

Let's see, Mr C. Shall I quote those postings of yours where you called Israel an apartheid state, those where you questioned the number of victims of the Holocaust, or those where you stated that Jews and Arabs killing each others would mean more Christians? The insanity of equating criticism of Israel with anti-Semetism as bad enough. Coming from someone who has written opinions like those above, it's even worse.

Nope, you barely advocate discrimination, intolerance, hatred and nonsense.

You mean the way you would like the Government to treat French, a Canadian language, and canadians who speak it. Tell me.. in that parralel universe of yours, do the Leafs win the Stanley Cup every year?

You must be paying taxes to the government of a foreign country... or another. Because the discrimination you claim does not exist.

I would argue that the Acadians did not take it in silence. But then, unlike Leafless, they had a point.