The_Squid

I put on my conservative hat for that post.

Her carbon-footprint is huge. This is exactly the type of wasteful inefficiency the carbon tax will get rid of. http://news.nationalpost.com/news/canada/portrait-of-five-ontario-hydro-bills-how-a-rural-couple-pays-500-a-month-and-toronto-brothers-pay-100 Also, if minimum wage were increased, she would make more than $50k working 75 hours per week. Or, if this is a single job she's working at, her employer is ripping her off and not paying her overtime. This lady's finances don't add up.... I think she was exaggerating.

I am neither Trudeau nor Wynne..... she did get a hug. $500... $1000 is double that. It sounds like she doesn't have a roof!!

Do you think Obama was born in the USA?

I think it's a ridiculous idea.

$1000 per month for Hydro? Does she use the oven to heat her mansion??? Something is not adding up with this lady. I think she was after a hug from our goodlooking PM...

Call the waaambulance! meanwhile, I'm sure they all have a cellphone... cable TV... etc, etc...

It wasn't an issue.... nor should it be. Anyone with half a brain realizes that the PM will be out delivering the gov't message. That's part of what they do. What we have on this board is people complaining for the sake of complaining... cuz Trudeau!!

You missed the point.... you're complaining that he is even out there doing this tour, but when Harper does it, no complaints... or it was someone else's fault... No... hydro is not a federal responsibility. Try again. Moving away from dirty electric power is a good thing.

LOL Of course it was someone else's fault that Harper spent $100k+ promoting his gov't policies. Of course, Harper took no questions and it lasted an hour. You would be bitching if Trudeau stayed in his office too.... So you think Hydro is a federal responsibility?

Don't forget "thread-jacking"!

Where were you people prior to November 2015????

I like that idea if it's locked and the Mods simply give their explanation. An ongoing thread full of debate is unnecessary and would cause a shitstorm.

The individual and the group, if the group didn't immediately condemn it and go to the teacher to report it. ETA: I have no idea if this is the case here. Details are skinny in the OP.

Not necessarily... Perhaps a previous sermon mentioned something unethical and/or violent and there was a complaint. They need to ensure the "sermon" doesn't violate other student's rights or make them uncomfortable. Sometimes a club/group will need special attention if they have violated school rules in the past. Are the boys and girls segregated? If they are, that should be halted immediately.

God backwards is dog....

Ignore the facts much?

Why would it be a headache to update? How many members are suspended on a daily basis that would make it onerous to write (for example): The_Squid - 4 days