bud

'possession' is different than "under influence". this is not the first time american woman has made a mistake and when confronted is not willing to accept that she's made a mistake. everyone can see what the act says. my suggestion is not to bother with her. she's hopeless.

i tried finding this law, but couldn't find it. can you point to this law you speak of in the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act? this is what i found in regards to offences - it doesn't look like being under the influence or high is considered being in possession: OFFENCES AND PUNISHMENT Particular Offences Possession of substance 4. (1) Except as authorized under the regulations, no person shall possess a substance included in Schedule I, II or III. Obtaining substance (2) No person shall seek or obtain (a) a substance included in Schedule I, II, III or IV, or ( an authorization to obtain a substance included in Schedule I, II, III or IV from a practitioner, unless the person discloses to the practitioner particulars relating to the acquisition by the person of every substance in those Schedules, and of every authorization to obtain such substances, from any other practitioner within the preceding thirty days

you're wrong. israel does not accept a palestinian state: Self-Rule The Government of Israel flatly rejects the establishment of a Palestinian Arab state west of the Jordan river. http://www.knesset.gov.il/elections/knesset15/elikud_m.htm

the israeli government does not accept a palestinian state.

ah. right. sure thing loopy.

while i have never condoned terrorist attacks by palestinians (or israelis), and have condemned them repeatedly, you promote the ethnic cleansing of palestinians. i'm above you, vermin.

it says a lot about you when you try to excuse current israeli actions by comparing them to treatment of aboriginals in the past. treatments that would in no shape or form be accepted right now.

you are numero uno with your magnificent comparisons. a state for the palestinians is not israel's decision to make. it's a given right which will happen, whether the zionists like it or not.

ps - neither of the presidents above should be called lefties. a real lefty would never become the president of united states. carter was more of a centrist and obama and clinton would be considered just right of centre.

increase of national debt/GDP by presidents: carter: -3.3% reagan: +11.3% reagan: +9.3% george sr.: +13.0% clinton: -0.7% clinton: -9.0% dubya: +7.1 dubya: +20.7 obama: +9.0

yeah! fuck them palestinians and their state! nice to see you lining up and OK'ing israel's refusal to accept a palestinian state.

better yet, here is likud's platform, on the israeli government site: Self-Rule The Government of Israel flatly rejects the establishment of a Palestinian Arab state west of the Jordan river. The Palestinians can run their lives freely in the framework of self-rule, but not as an independent and sovereign state. Thus, for example, in matters of foreign affairs, security, immigration and ecology, their activity shall be limited in accordance with imperatives of Israel's existence, security and national needs.

very candid.

the greek economy was one of the fastest growing economies in the eurozone between 2000-2007. then the financial crisis happened and greece's two biggest industries, tourism and shipping, plummeted and revenues fell by 15%. the greek government didn't address this problem and continued to borrow more money. it has been discovered that they paid banks like goldman sachs millions of dollars to fix the books since early 2000 to hide the level of borrowing. spain's problems is mostly from a property bubble and mortgage debt. similar to what we saw in the u.s. similar with ireland. low corporate taxes led to more risky lending for business investment and mortgages. portugal - source A report published in January 2011 by the Diário de Notícias, a leading Portuguese newspaper, demonstrated that in the period between the Carnation Revolution in 1974 and 2010, the democratic Portuguese Republic governments have encouraged over expenditure and investment bubbles through unclear public-private partnerships. This has funded numerous ineffective and unnecessary external consultancy and advising committees and firms, allowed considerable slippage in state-managed public works, inflated top management and head officers' bonuses and wages, causing a persistent and lasting recruitment policy that has boosted the number of redundant public servants. The economy has also been damaged by risky credit, public debt creation and mismanaged European structural and cohesion funds for almost four decades. Apparently, the Prime Minister Sócrates's cabinet was not able to forecast or prevent any of this when symptoms first appeared in 2005, and later was incapable of doing anything to ameliorate the situation when the country was on the verge of bankruptcy in 2011. iceland has a different story. banks were deregulated in 2001 and that's when they started to upload debts when foreign companies were accumulated and of course, they weren't able to refinance this debt and it went downhill from there.

israel is always moving the line in the sand. has been a strategy for decades. “right to exist” “jewish state for jewish people”. israel wants to make it look like the ball is in the palestinian court by always introducing and becoming hysterical over bs. the truth is that the palestinian authority (arafat) accepted the state of israel in 1988 in the PLO declaration. since then, the only thing we've seen is the increasing of settlements. why? because israel is not interested in a real and just peace. they are not interested and capable of negotiating for a just peace. fact is that the israeli government is no different than hamas. the likud party has vowed to never allow a palestinian state while, we all know, hamas does not accept the state of israel.

*ding* american woman, intentionally or unintentionally, hypes the danger of islam.

here is a decent jew talking about jewish extremism:

why hasn't the israeli government ever shown concern about it being recognized as a 'jewish state' until 2007? it's tough to answer this question, isn't it? all treaties and legal documents have asked the PLO and the neighbouring countries to recognize the state of israel. the PLO has already done this. now, suddenly, only a few years ago a new request has come in, masked as an eternal struggle for acceptance by the arabs, when in reality, it was never an issue before 2007. this is another red herring and another tactic to divert the real reasons for the stalls in negotiations with the palestinians. anyone who understands the conflict knows that the real reason for the stall is israel's inability to accept at least a freeze on the settlements or to discuss the illegal annexation of east jerusalem and parts of west bank and of course, the question of right of return. bibi is in a tough situation. he has to avoid losing his coalition government which is made up of mostly religious extremist and settler parties. on the other hand, there is heavy pressure from the international community, including the u.s. to start negotiations. so to divert from the real reason for not wanting to negotiate and to carry on the status quo, we're seeing this sudden call for being 'recognized as a jewish state'. i love talking about the truth. you guys should try it some time.

why did it suddenly become important to 'recognize israel as a jewish state'? this 'recognition' has not been part of any treaties with any neighbouring countries. it was never part of any past negotiations with the PLO either. not the madrid conference in 91, not the oslo talks in 93, camp david summit in 2000 or any other negotiations until 2007 when olmert was leaving office. so why, all of a sudden, it's become so important?

when did recognizing israel as a jewish state become an obligation? is it part of any legal obligation?

*snort* describe to me how you're a left winger. do you play hockey in a beer league?

stfu fascist. would you prefer if they called for ethnic cleansing instead like you do? fuck off with your moral bs.

the 2 year old was at home. he was killed when israel targeted his father. meaning that israel doesn't care that a child was in the house when they shoot missiles. 18 August 2011 Malek Khaled Hamad Shaat, 2, of Rafah refugee camp, Gaza, killed by an IDF missile while at home in Block J of the camp. He was killed during the targeted killing of his father, a member of the Popular Resistance Committees' Nasser Saladin Brigades. 19 August 2011 Islam Motaz Basem Quraiqe, 1, of Shujaiya, east of Gaza City, Gaza, killed, along with his uncle and father, by an IDF drone while riding on a motor cycle during the targeted killing of his father, a leader in Islamic Jihad's al-Quds Brigades. 29 August 2011 Haitham Ahmad Mustafa Maruf, 13, of Beit Lahiya, Gaza, died in Shifa Hospital, Gaza, of wounds sustained from an IDF drone attack while working on his family farm on August 21. stfu fascist. in your sick world, ethnic cleansing is A OK. the rockets will continue to fly as long as israel continues to occupy palestinian land, kill their children and deny the palestinians their rights.

you make a valid point. i wasn't trying to dodge your question. i was only pointing out that the children listed are not only what you described. lets say that some of the children, who are in their late teens, were killed while engaged in terrorist activities. what about the other children? like the children that were killed last month, in august. the list is above and their situation is given. should you look the other way? can their killing be excused? should israel be condemned for these attacks that kill innocent people, especially children? should harper continue to support israel's illegal actions and war crimes (as concluded by the UN, amnesty international, HRW, the red cross)? hamas should be condemned and not supported for their actions. why is harper giving israel a pass despite their actions?

here is a list of children killed a month ago: August 2011 16 August 2011 Saed Abdul-Rahim Mahmoud al-Majdalawi, 17, of Nusseirat refugee camp, Gaza, killed by IDF gunfire to his head and chest near the Gaza perimeter fence northeast of Dier al-Balah, Gaza. Paramedics were prevented from reaching the mentally-disabled and speech-imparied youth for more than an hour. 18 August 2011 Malek Khaled Hamad Shaat, 2, of Rafah refugee camp, Gaza, killed by an IDF missile while at home in Block J of the camp. He was killed during the targeted killing of his father, a member of the Popular Resistance Committees' Nasser Saladin Brigades. 19 August 2011 Islam Motaz Basem Quraiqe, 1, of Shujaiya, east of Gaza City, Gaza, killed, along with his uncle and father, by an IDF drone while riding on a motor cycle during the targeted killing of his father, a leader in Islamic Jihad's al-Quds Brigades. 29 August 2011 Haitham Ahmad Mustafa Maruf, 13, of Beit Lahiya, Gaza, died in Shifa Hospital, Gaza, of wounds sustained from an IDF drone attack while working on his family farm on August 21. go ahead. give your excuses for killing children.