I think the complainants may have a slight benefit by dent of being heard by a judge only. The effectiveness of bludgeoning cross examination by the defense may not have the same impact on a judge who is likely more aware of the tactic and will be more able to separate the chaff from the wheat.
As we know, being grilled on the stand as a sexual assault complainant is tough, and so far these witnesses haven't fared well. However, I don't think they are making all this up.
Nor had I, but the more I think about it... Even the idea that you know who could be a plant. But maybe I'm getting a bit into conspiracy theory there.
I suspect with the case you refer to, (irrelevant posts) the troll rule about report and ignore is the best way. Having said that, I most always just ignore, otherwise you'd be pretty busy reporting.
He tried a wrongful dismissal suit initially, and quickly withdrew it, probably on the advice of a knowledgeable lawyer. Regardless of the outcome of the trial, he is wasting his time with a civil suit.
At least if meetings are taking place there is the chance for positive outcomes. That's I guess a part of the current breath of fresh air that has given Canadians confidence in the new government.
I recall years ago watching a live hallowe'en thing from Dublin and who but Van walks in apparently totally unscripted (it sure seemed so) and sat on a stool and played a couple of tunes. Priceless.
I guess I forgot to say it was in a pub. But you may have guessed that.
Well i did as you suggested. You can't help but get a lift from that, (even if you don't understand the words) I used to sing in a choir and as amateur as we were, I miss it. It's one effective way to learn teamwork.