lictor616

you guys are complete lunatics... why don't you watch the freaking documentary before making ridiculous paranoid comparisons...

we've come to a point now were we actually select race or minority status ABOVE CAPACITY AND ACHIEVEMENT. Firefighters consistently lower their standards for minorities and especially women... Police are even worse... the U of T for years had a slogan of "selecting diversity at the cost of expertise"... and what's worse is that the liberals refuse to account for the huge damage this is doing to the smooth functioning of our society... and if you criticize them openly they hit you with the racist card... diabolical...

omg just when you thought you heard all the possible godwinnian nonsense and knavery, somebody takes it down a notch further... amazing...

of course not you dunce, its based on the assumption that some races are more deserving! which is precisely the same difference. btw race is not merely "a color of skin"...

racism doesn't have the same definition for us. Its been said over and over (and the documentary I linked speaks about this very subject) that THERE IS NO DEFINITE DEFINITION OF RACISM... its become a completely subjective word... To you it is some sort of "sin" or a moral failing of some sort... (that only whites are capable of) To me "racism" ie the recognition that races are real and are not equal... is simply a fact of evolution... The subconscious and conscious practice of "racial cognition" is indeed a natural trait...

no, because I would very much like my grand children to look like my ancestors... I don,t think there's anything wrong with being white... in fact I quite like our traits and aptitudes... if the choice is between green eyes (such as I have) or blue eyes, porcelain skin, light brown or blond hair... or black kinky hair and 100% chance of black or brown eyes... I prefer the lighter hues... why would I want them to be different? now of course I wouldn't stop my children from marrying outside of their race, but I would express my reservations... now I bet you'll use my answer to tell me there's something wrong with me ...

so when affirmative action selects a black person for a job because of racial quotas.... that's racism... why is it our official policy then? and why areN,t liberals (who are supposed to be the real egalitarians) opposing it?

lol and hitler was a vegetarian animal lover... so "logically" PETA is a nazi front... why even bother argus, their debating tactics essentially consist of name calling and PC brow beating... they use all the same tired and overused junk from the liberal arsenal... "racist", "intolerent", "ignorant", "discriminatory", "reactionary", "hater", "neo-nazi", "goosestepper", Hitler etc etc ad infinitam nauseam.... "stromfront" is just a tool, a scarecrow they use to badger people who are on to their nonsense.

no you're quite the PC drone... I might as well be talking to my TV... you scarcely have a single unorthodox opinion about anything... you're a "mass man", a follower.. the fact that you reject diverging opinions just because they are divergent is proof of your close mindedness. actually you're exactly like the interviewees in this documentary here's a chinese proverb to sum up: “A wise man makes his own decisions, an ignorant man follows public opinion”

conversation with smallc the close minded lefty.

pretty much yeah...

racism is an evolutionnary trait found not only in humans but in all animalia as well... it is a deeply rooted instinct of self preservation and defence... every healthy organism has it... the ones who don't are not here today and have been eaten by the ones who did...

ahahah sorta like the statement that "ALL GENERLIZATIONS ARE FALSE" think about that

exactly no two humans are the same... just as no two dogs (even of the same race) are identical. There is no such thing under the sun as "equality"... instead there is an immutable iron law of INEQUALITY. There are similarities however. Genes within single a population tend to be "MORE SIMILAR". That's what race is: CLUSTERS OF SIMILAR GENES... SIMILAR DNA. If we were all the same and had the same genes: we'd all be alike in traits... or at the very least traits would occur haphazardly everywhere... so two black as tar africans could be able to copulate and engender a blonde asian kid.... The Aztecs where astonishing astronomers and architects, whether they are genetically "the same cline or race" as the Utes has not been verified ... from photographs they appear to be Blackfoot and genetically distinct from the Azteks.

in the article I seem to remember him saying that Obama was a bad candidate because he was a black supremacist lording over a european majority land (and that as a black supremacist, Obama doesn't care for white interests and hence would be bad for most americans).... But he also said that an obama would be a great boost for white nationalists because it would provide whites with a COLD SHOWER and show them how dispossessed they where. He also said that Obama would make many people lose faith in the system (which also would benefit Duke's movement)... He also said that McCain was worse and on top of being a bad candidate he was also a TRAITOR TO HIS RACE. to quote duke: "In reality, Barack Hussein Obama is no more of a danger to the interests of the White American than Hillary Clinton or John McCain. Perhaps he is even less of one, for when traitors have become your own leaders they are much more dangerous to you than a powerful enemy outside of your own ranks." So, what Duke is basically saying is that Obama is the lesser of three evils and the preferable choice for President. Duke also harbors no desire to see Obama dead... in fact, he is terribly worried about the prospects for assassination: snip: "How a possible assassination would be a tragedy not only for Obama and his family, it would be an absolute catastrophe for the rights and heritage of European Americans." "Everyone in this Movement for European-American rights and heritage must understand that an assassination of Barack Obama would be an evil act, catastrophic act for White Americans. "Understand that anyone who is even remotely associated with our ideas who would promote any thoughts of violence or vicious or truly hateful rhetoric is either working for the other side or is so stupid he should be. Either way, we must protect ourselves from such psychopaths."

no on an individual basis race may or may not be a way to determine a person's skills or abilities... its a rare occurrence (but it happens) that some blacks may have extremely high IQ's (i'm talking Prometheus society high 170+ or way beyond the 99th percentile )... but AS A WHOLE blacks do exhibit different rates compared to other racial groupings... that's simply a fact. And I never said that "skin color" had a causal effect on intelligence... I did say that RACE does in fact generally determine types and degrees of intelligence and certain physical aptitudes... the problem is that when you generalize you have to go with what IS LIKELY... "A generalization of a concept is an extension of the concept to less-specific criteria." On the whole blacks generally will exhibit lower IQ's... that's what you can't accept...

well Ghandi was indeed a racist and national socialist... for indians... Read on what Ghandi thought of blacks and what he termed "Kaffar" races... most of it would scare the pants off of flower-souled liberals (who foolishly admire him for the wrongest reasons) ...

what question was that?

precisely right! amazing isn't it

how revolting

no, If Obama would have been a viable candidate that would have been fiscally responsible and anti-big government and anti-taxation and anti socialism... I personally (where I a US citizen) would have voted for him... Presidents are merely frontmen of administrations, mouth pieces if you will... the common blunder of voting for a person is not a mistake I make. Incidentally, I would vote for a black candidate over any white candidate that is overly religious for instance. When I consider a president, I look at the evidence, I must look at his record. If i'm looking for a ditch-digger or accountant, I do the same. I look ONLY at the record and the evidence... I don't take account of his race... I wouldn't sacrifice performance for race EVER. What liberals do, is first look if a candidate is part of an aggrieved sacrosanct minority segment... "oh is the person black? perhaps I should hire him in the interests of diversity"... "or to prove that I am a tolerant egalitarian"... its actually been made a policy program.... called AFFIRMATIVE ACTION. That's right leftists (who are supposed to be racial egalitarians) are the ones who put together a system of racial remuneration (who give advantages to people based on race) ! That's what happened with this election... people voting for someone BECAUSE of his race to prove that they aren't racists... which of course is simply lunacy. And you yourself have defended affirmative action in these pages too canadien... so howabout YOU stop being a hypocrite... admit that you're about as racially blind as a klansman.

yet here you are taking your time to comment and spout ad hominems... (talk about nonsense)

of course.... you would say that... some stormfronters also endorsed McCain... presumably... mccain is a nazi by your logic right? oh and there's also that article by david duke who endorsed Obama and urged white nationalists to VOTE FOR OBAMA... so again... Obama= nazi according to you... do you ever get tired slinging the same logical fallacies OVER and OVER again? If I quote something, you try to discredit by showing how one or another potentially racist element also endorses it... or you just flat out break out the godwin law epiteths... do you really think this has an impact on me? Why not just politely address what I say and refute it through argumentation? If you're too indolent to debate then just IGNORE it and go away...

we're talking about interracial rape. U.S. Justice Department 2006 rape statistics: http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/pub/pdf/cvus0602.pdf Scroll to Table 42. --> 32,443 Whites raped by Blacks, less then 10 Blacks raped by Whites. U.S. Justice Department 2005 rape statistics: http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/pub/pdf/cvus0502.pdf Scroll to Table 42. --> 37,460 Whites raped by Blacks, less then 10 Blacks raped by Whites. U.S. Justice Department 2004 rape statistics: http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/pub/pdf/cvus0402.pdf Scroll to Table 42. --> 11,611 Whites raped by Blacks, less then 10 Blacks raped by Whites. U.S. Justice Department 2003 rape statistics: http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/pub/pdf/cvus0302.pdf Scroll to Table 42. --> 20,309 Whites raped by Blacks, less then 10 Blacks raped by Whites.

HAHAA look at your logic... people want to have CHANGE, they want that Ah HA historical moment (of having the FIRST BLACK PRESIDENT) ... but don,t you dare suggest that that has anything to do with race... 96% of the black electorate VOTED FOR OBAMA (of course, I know you'll be disingenuous and say that they did'nt vote for him because of his race ... but we both know you're just playing dumb) a survey by the New York Times I seem to remember claimed to have ascertained by polling that 80% or more of blacks actually stipulated that Obama's race was a factor in voting for him (which shouldn't surprise anyone). Don't you remember all those MSNBC news segments implying that not voting for obama is the same as racism? all the celebrity hooplah (unprecedented in presidential elections)? Jay Z producing a rap biddy EXPRESSLY for Obama.. with such obvious lyrics as: "no more White lies: my president is BLACK" and young jeezy saying: "moving "whitey" out of the white house"... "keep it moving bi*ch my president is black" to UNANIMOUS and ROARING APPLAUSE here: peep it: I mean how naive does one have to be (or willfully obtuse) to deny that Obama's race IS CENTRAL for his popularity...