bjre

That is what western media did all the time.

It is not same because Canada shows worse human right situation on that. If Chinese government didn't do that in 1989, Now China maybe not a stable place, maybe now it is already used by terrorists to use as many other bases like Iraq and Afghanistan. Far more people will die. The result of Chinese government did is they gain a peaceful time for 20 years for its people to build their own better life.

They make the protest becomes riot and use mass violence makes people die before army come. They teach the student to do that. And they are doing the similar thing in many countries and create many un-stable places that killing happened very often. That is the result.

1995 in Canada, a life of peaceful protest was killed by Canadian Government Machine. 1989 in China, lots of life was lost due to the war between US and China. (the reason see the post before)

The riot of Tiananmen in 1989 was created by United State. http://www.southasiaanalysis.org/papers2/paper198.htm

That is what you enjoy? Here is the forum of People's Daily (Party's largest newspaper), if you can read Chinese. http://bbs1.people.com.cn/boardList.do?action=postList&boardId=1&pageNo=1 Maybe, but the positive side is the world can be more peaceful. September 7, 1995 (6 years after 1989) Dudley George was killed. I don't know how many people will consider Chinese Communist Government is still Communist. I guess maybe Health Canada can be more fit to be called as communist.

Do you think Canada ban death penalty has an condition? Then why Canada need Internet censorship?

There is no trap, just to help you think logically. China don't ban free expression that criticism of the government itself. You get that wrong knowledge because those knowledge are banned by western media. If you go to any large forum in China you will find most posts are the criticism of government. I hope you are open-minded enough and can tell your reason on the subject what I have told instead of on myself if you are reasonable.

Google teachs them how to scan books and break copy right laws.

All those are CIA created issues. And the other riots happened all around the world.

That is the reason China has law to block some messages. The main part is from all organizations supported by CIA, their lies lead to many people die near Tiananmen square in 1989, and in Lhasa in 2008 and in Ulumuqi in 2009. CIA's people is everywhere, they are controlled by US government, the US government is controlled by big business, they want to earn money, they want their representatives in every government to make laws for them to do robbery from people in every nation. If they feel hard to do that they send messages to let people protest and riot so that police or army will make order in the country, when people die, they can use that to make more riots, or simply send army there, until their people can be the main part of the government. They are the root of all un-stable part of this world now. They have money, they have better technology, their work is efficient. China is not perfect, it has many problems, China is working on that, and they work very well, the people there live much better life then 30 years before. But the big business mainly in US still feel hard to control it, they want more, they don't care how many people will be killed in riots. They care only money. They don't care even people in west nations, they make many un-stable places in the world, when those people in those places become angry and try to kill back to the west, they sell security machines to earn more, they don't care the people in western nations also lost many things include privacy, human right, freedom, lifes of army guys and journalists, and many others. They did it in many countries. The censorship in China is to avoid this kind of killing people events. I fully understand why China do that censorship, they make their country more stable and the world more peaceful. The freedom of speech is important, but in western countries, you can not get information from all aspect, you can get part of the truth that from the media controlled by big business. China is still weak that they are not able to fight the western media if they don't censors Internet. When the day real freedom of speech is available in western nations, so that all truth will be available in western media, no more Iraq WMD lies, no more H1N1 scandals, no more CO2 lead to global warming lies, no more religion wars, I hope China can remove all the censorship at that time. I hope the people in western nations can get more education, and be more knowledgeable to understand that it is the big business that make them lost so much. I hope they can get real democracy that they can truly decide they own life instead of always fooled by media. I hope they can get rid of the fate always be robbed by insurance companies, banks, hospitals, medical companies, CAS and the legal system, and many others. I hope they can live better life someday.

Are you suggesting that if let the Neo-Nazis gain power, that will lead to kill people. So you think if there is something that could lead to killing, then the Internet content should be censored and blocked?

I have some limited knowledge about history. I just want to know what do you think about: what will happen if the small movement gain power, so that you can justify their censorship.

What are they worry about if the small movement gaining power?

TrueMetis: Why Canadian Human Rights Commission censors Internet? Why don't they just let it be? What are they worry about?

What German worry about? If they don't censor it what will happen?

If they find someone planing hate crimes in Internet, will they let it be without stoping / editing / blocking it? Do you think if this is necessary? Why it is necessary or not necessary? If you go to Google's German website: http://images.google.de/advanced_image_search?hl=en and click "No filtering" option in SafeSearch, you will find the following text: Note: You have selected the least restrictive filter for your results. Images not compliant with German law will still be filtered. You may, however, see some images that you consider inappropriate for minors. If minors are using your browser we suggest enabling strict filtering. Do you think it is stoping/editing/blocking some internet content? Do you think if it is censorship or not? Do you think if it is correct or not? If correct why German do it is correct, while China do it is not correct? If it is not correct, do you think if Clinton should do something against Germany?

In your opinion, what is a censorship?

Why should some people be sued because express their opinion?

Go to CBC web site and click any news and try to post a comment for example this one: http://www.cbc.ca/world/story/2010/01/15/haiti-canada-missing.html You will find: Comments on this story are pre-moderated. Before they appear, comments are reviewed by moderators to ensure they meet our submission guidelines. Comments are open and welcome until Friday, January 22, 2010 at 11:59 p.m. ET. We reserve the right to close comments before then. Is this stop some people from writing?

Watch this video to see how Canadian Human Rights Commission do internet censorship http://parlvu.parl.gc.ca/Parlvu/ContentEntityDetailView.aspx?ContentEntityId=5071

Microsoft CEO says no China exit -- CEO says recent cyber-attacks not out of ordinary The company's stance indicates the world's largest software maker is not likely to support its fierce rival in its battle with China and rebuffs broad U.S. political backing for Google. "There are attacks every day. I don't think there was anything unusual, so I don't understand," Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer told Reuters after a meeting on modernizing government services at the White House. "We're attacked every day from all parts of the world and I think everybody else is too. We didn't see anything out of the ordinary." Now is Hillary Clinton who aggressively launch this cyberwar. Internet censership is exist in US and Canada. it is nothing new. The result from Google search engine is not free, it is a result of business operations, it has connection with the interest of the organizations who controls Google and American. They want to replace the dominate voice from China with the voice of their own business. They don't care if China become an un-stable place like Somali, Iraq or Afghanistan that people kill each other. They have attempted to bewilder the people with superstition and groundless fears (such as WMD, H1N1, CO2 lead to global warming, religion war, etc) by means of all kind of media. So that they can take more money from people all over the world.

I said it long before: http://www.mapleleafweb.com/forums//index.php?showtopic=15225&view=findpost&p=478742 Everything in western world is controlled by big business because they have money. They control the media, so they can fool people so that control votes. In this way they control governments. The goal is for them to take more money. They are going to control media not only in the western world, but also the whole world. United States are expert of that. They created one non-stable area after another. The only thing they want is they want to put their man in every government to make laws so that they can always earn money and define everything that not help their money-earning purpose as crime. Twitter vs. Terror

Is the CO2 that determines the climate change? Then, why there can be a 30 year global cooling although CO2 level is still increasing? It looks like that "scientics" love to say what politicians need. IPCC scientist: Global cooling headed our way for the next 30 years? The cold this December and January has been noteworthy and newsworthy. We just posted that December 2009 was the Second Snowiest on Record in the Northern Hemisphere. Beijing was hit by its heaviest snowfall in 60 years, and Korea had the largest snowfall ever recorded since record keeping began in 1937. Plus all of Britain was recently covered by snow. The cold is setting records too. Oranges are freezing and millions of tropical fish are dying in Florida, there are Record low temperatures in Cuba and thousands of new low temperature records being set in the USA as well as Europe. There are signs everywhere, according to an article in the Daily Mail, which produced this graphic Latif, is a professor at the Leibniz Institute at Germany’s Kiel University and an author of the U.N.’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) report. Latif is a prominent scientist in the UN’s IPCC climate research group. Latif thinks the cold snap Americans, Brits, and Europeans have been suffering through is the beginning of another cycle, this one a down cycle. He says we’re in for 30 years of cooler temperatures. While maybe it is a harsh prediction, he calls it a “mini ice age”. That phrase is sure to stick in the craw of more than a few people. His theory is based on an analysis of natural oscillations in water temperatures in the oceans. According to his He believes our current cold weather pattern is a pause, a “30-years-long blip”, in the larger cycle of global warming, which postulates that temperatures will rise rapidly over the coming years. By the way: In March 2000, Dr David Viner, then a member of the University of East Anglia Climatic Research Unit, the body now being investigated over the notorious ‘Warmergate’ leaked emails, said that within a few years snowfall would become ‘a very rare and exciting event’ in Britain, and that ‘children just aren’t going to know what snow is’.

Swine flu 'a false pandemic' to sell vaccines, expert says * By Chris Pollard * From: NewsCore * January 12, 2010 1:11PM THE swine flu scare was a "false pandemic" led by drugs companies that stood to make billions from vaccines, a leading health expert said. Wolfgang Wodarg, head of health at the Council of Europe, claimed major firms organized a "campaign of panic" to put pressure on the World Health Organization (WHO) to declare a pandemic, UK tabloid The Sun reports. He believes it is, "one of the greatest medicine scandals of the century", and has called for an inquiry.