dub

so what you're saying is that war crimes should not be judged by the world if the crime is done by the nations with bigger guns.

heh it's funny, because it's true.

you've sunk to DoP level of ridiculous comments. i don't know what he babbles about now since i have him on ignore, but really krusty. 2 year old grandson = gandhi 'followers' ? that's just too much.

to me, it's whoever that supports and tries to justify the israeli government's illegal occupation and land annexation. would that be the majority of israelis?

lols! another krusty analogy! 2 year old grandson = gandhi supporters!

you quoted the question about the video footage. fine. whatever. lets pretend that you weren't trying to answer that question. where is dancer, the guy who makes shit up? where is all the video footage coming out of gaza that counters AI's investigation and report? all he's done is post a couple of outdated, short clips from who knows where. where is all this video footage?

how many random civilians died in gaza? AI and other human rights organizations have come to the conclusion that israel made indiscriminate attacks, killing scores of civilians. that's state terrorism.

eh? you replied with this: so in response to my question about your claim in regards to the 'all the video footage', you gave me something that did not explain your claim to the video footage. so it's you who is confused and cannot even keep up with what you're saying. so yes. here is another chance for you to show all the video proof from the gaza war that AI missed.

damn gandhi for preaching non-violent protests! he is responsible for anyone who gets hurt in these non-violent protests! same goes with the dalai lama and suicidal peaceful and non-violent protests! lols @ krusty's comparisons

the reason why they removed the settlements was because they were costing them too much. they simply removed the 7000 settlers from gaza and moved them to other illegal settlements in the west bank. in fact, despite the gaza settlement removals, the number of illegal settlements have increased. there is also the whole collective punishment that israel has imposed on the gaza people since they elected hamas into power over 2 years ago.

this is not about me. after the investigation, the report concluded that hamas did not use civilians as human shields during the recent gaza conflict. however, they did conclude that israel did use civilians as human shields many times and in different ways.

anyone who uses civilians as human shields is wrong. your message is that israel's use of civilians as human shields is not wrong. how do you expect to be taken seriously? i don't think Fat Fingers should be giving typing lessons and failing at being witty.

says the guy who gave the reply below to this comment: an example of how disgustingly dishonest these war crimes apologists can become. he has absolutely no shame in announcing their hypocrisy and double standards.

likud is the government. you're posting articles from 2006. maybe you should think before you press reply.

asks the guy who spends 90% of his time giving excuses and apologizing for war crimes committed by israel, while spending the remaining 10% of his time posting youtube videos from years ago to try to counter amnesty international's investigation of war crimes during the most recent gaza attack.

your opinion falls flat on its face when compared to the investigation:

so it's hamas' magical powers that israel pulls the trigger and kills palestinian children? i didn't know hamas exerted so much power over the IDF. you're apologizing for war crimes.

IDF was using families' homes as sniper points and keeping them there to prevent death? death of who? themselves? certainly not the people they were using as human shields. wow. did you just, shamelessly, try to apologize for for war crimes? you're on a roll.

why do you two lie so much?

way to jump in there and try to save the sinking krusty, but you fail again. are you posting random videos which we know nothing about and were posted way before the recent conflict and calling them your evidence against amnesty international's investigation? for a guy who claims to care so much about facts and the integrity of investigations, you sure don't follow what you say. the AI investigation has already shown that the IDF has used palestinian civilians as human shields on numerous occasions. it's amusing seeing war crimes apologists like dancer and krusty, apologizing for and even ignoring IDF's war crimes (using civilians as human shields), and then comeback with old and irrelevant videos to use as their counter investigation to AI. you are a sad case.

they did what exactly? Every country is their home including Palestine not by aggression but by loving service. not what the above says.

what you wrote above has more gibberish than meaning. terrorism = the systematic use of terror especially as a means of coercion one does it with homemade rockets and another with american made weapons.

simpleton.

you can act cocky and play pretend all you want, but it won't make a difference. at the end, i'm on the side of truth and facts and you are on the side of lies and deceit.

you are a sad human.