LesterDC

Yes, see Stalin and Hitler haha

If I were to follow that argument, I would say influence

Too bad they signed the pact.. I don't think the U.S. would be very happy if Canada just ignored the attack on U.S. soil.

Status authorized by a higher status..

Maybe, but the global community will know what is best for the global community. I am sure that Canada will not be the only country with that kind of attitude

perhaps the Zimbabweans should form their own terrorist groups and start attacking western countries before anybody gives half a shit about them.. It's sad but true though.. If you don't have power or influence, nobody will really care

It is libertarian for the decisions to be objective in such subjective matters. Mob rule is not libertarian, what if one person believes in something else? What if somebody decides to believe in something else? Where's the libertarianism for those people?

Maybe, but the idea of a man marrying another man isn't so pretty for them either. In the bible, god planned out marriages so that they would be for husbands and wives..

because brainwashing helps them believe that Israel is the root of all their problems.. Brainwashing is always the key element to the success of a radical party

Okay whatever. You can call it whatever you want.. They are homosexuals so I can say homosexuals.

Ah, yeah.. Perhaps.. But the act of having sexual relations with another man or woman scares the religious people away as well

who do you think the average citizen would rather align themselves with? Regimes within their own culture or the country who just blockaded them 18 months ago?

Homosexuality is a sexual preference or behavioural thing.. It isn't technically a gender thing because anybody from either gender could be straight or homosexual. By the way, how was that post in reply to my post to Mr.Canada?

Whats stopping a heterosexual Christian from performing incest? Oh yeah, nothing.. It was in the bible.

and the ground assault on Gaza will only strengthen the extremist philosophy. Radicalism always comes out whenever the country is going through serious troubles..

Last time I checked, it's COLOURS.

I don't think anybody ever forced Christians or whatever to marry homosexuals..

and if its against your religion for homosexuals to marry, then they can go marry some other place.. I could care less if a religion restricts homosexual marriage, that's their problem

and you're still here because..?

We could broaden the scope and say that anything which follows a doctrine dogmatically are the most intolerant people (obviously?). The Nazis, Stalinists and fundamental religious people

Why should we apply the same laws of our universe to the laws of some sort of intelligent creator? According to the theory of cosmological causality, everything happens because of something thing - cause and effect. So of course, there has to be a beginning. However, if some sort of intelligent creator initiated the universe, it does not need a catalyst like things do in our universe. This doesn't really help the religious cause however, this creator could be anything. Could we justify applying "human" characteristics to this creator?

Or we could see what happens if we let military men take over politics and governmental offices

Yep.. That's what they get for attacking the U.S.A., that's the whole point of NATO. If you don't want to get invaded, don't attack us

Yes, I have heard of these arguments, but you would still need a prime catalyst that would set everything into action.. "The uncertainty principle implies that particles can come into existence for short periods of time even when there is not enough energy to create them." This still implies that something was there before the creation of these particles.

Haha. Very funny. In your dreams