lukin

That is extremely accurate, wild bill. Here are some posts from waldo with respect to the book GH mentioned. So, no he didn't read the book. He just quotes what others have said.

I agree GH. I could be wrong, you could be wrong....all I want is to have the skeptics be given a fair chance to explain why they are skeptical. At one time I truly believed humans were causing climate change. Now, after a lot pf reading, I'm not convinced. It seems more political than scientific. It's interesting to hear the AGW proponents label the skeptical scientists as kooks. The funny thing is they weren't kooks when they believed humans were causing climate change, they only become kooks when they reverse their position.

Beware GH. I mentioned this exact same book in a previous thread, and waldo ripped it apart. I read the book, and it is a very good book.

There are becoming more and more scientists skeptical of the human factor. This is a great article. http://climatedepot.com/a/9035/SPECIAL-REPORT-More-Than-1000-International-Scientists-Dissent-Over-ManMade-Global-Warming-Claims--Challenge-UN-IPCC--Gore

If this can happebn in Sweden, the great socialist paradise, then it can happen in Canada.

It's hard to believe the most tolerant society in the world would be bombed by terrorists. http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/world/europe/sweden-calls-stockholm-blasts-terrorist-attack/article1834477/

An interesting perspective. http://wattsupwiththat.com/2010/12/10/moncktons-mexican-missive-4/

Fair enough. You know what jack, I've carried things too far. I apologize for my previous comments directed at you. They were wrong.

The funny thing, WB, is that Gairdner describe himself as a "cocky atheist" before he became a Christian.

Sorry buddy, you have insulted me and many other members whom you disagree with. Sorry, but your rebuttal is wrong. You've insulted groups of people, yet you claim to be intellectually superior. I exposed your hypocrisy. I have no use for your arrogance and lies.

The latest EKOS poll shows that the Green Party would win a majority in Canada if voting was limited to those under 25. http://www.cbc.ca/politics/story/2010/12/09/ekos-voter-intention-poll.html#socialcomments

I also voted for the NDP in our last provincial election, and CPC in the Federal election. I voted for Chretien twice and Joe Clark once during those federal elections. People often ask me how that can be. BM, I will only attack after I've been attacked. I may not be as politically astute as many posters on here, but no one needs to be ridiculed for what they say or what they post. If you go back and read my posts you will realize that certain members of this forum, wyly/waldo/jack weber resort to petty personal attacks when someone says something they don't like. For example, take a look in the Cancun thread. TrueMetis disagreed with something TimG said, so the first line in his rebuttal is to call Tim a moron. I don't think that is necessary BM.

I found the book to be very interesting. I don't expect everyone to read it. I also don't think people can really criticize something before they've read it. just my opinion.

It's a very detailed and well researched book bm. Like I said, I don't agree with everything in it. Many things are discussed such as welfare, health care, foreign aid hypocrisy, criminal justice and the power of unelected judges, and multiculturalism. The funny thing is that I've voted Liberal/NDP more often in elections than PC/CPC, so i am hardly a right-wing fundamentalist. Have a nice day bm.

So you've read it? It's juvenile to criticize something you haven't read. Any luck in the dating rooms last night, Jacky? 40 years old and patrolling dating sites......

It's easy to criticize something you haven't read, isn't it bm?

What do you want smallc? A summary of each of the 450 pages? Anyways, I'm off to play hockey tonight. Waldo and Jack, you guys should try to interact with live human beings once in awhile. It may help you get over some of your insecurities. I wish the both of you another stimulating, invigorating, exciting night and morning of posting on this forum. I'll read your response (lukin way, duck and dodge, blah, blah, blah)in the morning. Jack, let me know if any of those dating sites work out for you. Remember, when talking to someone on computer you can pretend to be all kinds of things you wished you were. Who'll really know the difference. Ciao.

The above comment brought to you by the master of the copy and paste.

I love it when the pathetic and lonely gang up on me and feed off each other's insecurities. Waldo, did you TELL on me yet? Jacky boy, don't confuse insults with reality. You've been easy to figure out. Finally, I'm disappointed in myself for making too many posts today. The last thing I want to do is live beside my computer like jacky and waldo. Do you guys have kids, or at least a goldfish? The shortest straw..... has been pulled.........for you.

Do you think you have a good sense of humor ,Jacky? Do your fellow losers on your datelines eat that up? Wldo can do what wldo needs to do. This forum is to him what a child is to a normal adult. I can't argue with pathetic...which is something you know a lot about. How's your fake wife doing?

I'll be glad to open a whole new can of worms. You like worms, jack? I know it sucks to be lonely , jack. But you have to ask yourself why you are in that situation. Then and only then will you discover true happiness.

The above comment brought to you by Jack Weber, the lonely, desperate man who calls his screen saver his wife.

OH Please, please waldo...I'm begging...don't TELL on me! PLEASE don't TELL on me!

What did John Lennon stand for?

This forum really is your life.....isn't it?