lukin

Now you have to make stuff up Jack. You're making yourself to be a bigger fool with each post. :lol: :lol: Jack, remember, your screen saver is not your wife.

Also, jacky doesn't know the difference between there and their. he's a lightweight.

Waldo can't answer the simplest of questions. Waldo, what are you doing to save our planet? What's the matter..you can't find that answer in one of your scientific journals? Waldo.....too insecure to answer a question that might require an original thought.

Jack, do you realize how pathetic it is for someone like you, 40ish, I'm guessing, to have the avatar you have on your profile page? i know you think it's cool...but come now...it smacks of desperation and insecurity. Easy to talk tough at a computer, eh jack, the true sign of a complete loser, no wonder you're single. Jack I made a fool of you in the Fox News thread. Which dating sites are you trolling these days? Hopefully soon you'll land the big one. 3200 posts and counting, jacky. Chicks dig that.

Just ask waldo what he is doing on a personal level to save our planet. He'll be stumped. If he's honest, that is not an answer he can find on the internet; he'd actually have to write something in his own words. He'll post some garbage totally off topic claiming to be someone of great intelligence because he read a science journal. Just like wyly, who labels many people uneducated or unsophisticated, yet when talking about North Korea he mentions the generals of Miramar. An educated person would realize the country is called Myanmar. Ghosthacked, you can't debate with people like waldo and wyly because they have to rely on someone else's writing to try to prove a point. They write the way they do because they are very insecure people.

Actually jack, you are a lot like waldo, so it doesn't surprise me you come on here to kiss his ass. You were attacking Fox News, even though you said you never watched it. Remember that comment? It's funny how you can attack something without watching it. How can you state that if you never watch it? Are you just going by what someone else said? Pretty sad jackie ole boy, pretty sad. Months before this station even has its first broadcast, you compare it to Fox News, a station you never watch. Talk about jumping to conclusions. Sarcasm doesn't make you credible, Jacky. It makes you desperate. You should stick to internet dating Jack.....I'm sure it's working out great for you champ. What colour are YOUR boxing gloves jacky? Jacki, still waiting for you to explain yourself on your above quotes. Don't let your screen saver confuse you with reality.

Waldo, did you have popcorn for supper again?

Let me know when you find a scientific journal telling me what You are doing on a personal level to save the planet. Can't formulate your own opinion, can you. Pathetic. All you do is yelp denier, denier, denier, after posting someone else's writing....just like the obedient lap dog. Give the puter a rest. Get some exercise. It takes a tedious bore to know a tedious bore. You describe yourself to a tee.

I guess I hit the nail on the head with respect to your situation, eh. I'm not worried about the other posters here. You seem to think you are some kind of authority on this forum. Making friends on the computer really doesn't interest me. Your comment just proves my point. You're too easy to figure out You still can't answer a simple question that requires you to formulate an original response. I know you sit in your lonely existence and get a kick out of the fact that you think you are ridiculing me by posting on a message forum...............that actually makes me feel a little sympathy for you.....that's something only the loneliest of the pathetic would do. Why can't you tell me what you are doing to save the planet?

You can't converse with anyone who asks you to answer a simple question. A question that would be hard to copy and paste. You can't answer a simple question unless it is written by someone else, hence the excellent copy and paste skills. Why can't you tell me what you are doing to save the planet? Maybe you'll convince me. You sure post a lot on here; the sign of a lonely soul.

Buddy, are you lonely? I asked you a simple question months ago asking what you are doing on a personal level to combat this so-called climate change. You couldn't provide a response because it would have forced you to write something original...not copy and paste what someone else had written. You cannot be taken seriously. Please tell me where Mirimar is.

You mean I should copy and paste the comments of others like you? That 's too..........waldoish.

Another great piece of writing from Rex Murphy. http://fullcomment.nationalpost.com/2010/12/04/rex-murphy-cancun-sun-speeds-decay-of-global-warming-charade/

What makes this scientists the ultimate authority, truemetis? Why can't we see this hero of yours debate a scientists who doesn't beleive what he is saying? YOU know there are thousands of scientists who do not think humans are causing global warming, I mean climate change. Why is it that only the scientists who support AGW are considederd respected scientists by people like you, yet those who don't believe in the flavour of the day are labeled "deniers"? I person blind from birth would have a hard time believing there is this thing in the sky called the moon. Do yourself a favour truemetis, and stop being misled by the powerful green lobby.

Does anyone notice that waldo and wyly consistently rely on the argumentum ad ignorantium?

All this effort copying and pasting and multi-quoting...and yet...you're still wrong....the gulliblewaldoway Run for cover walnut...the sky is falling!!!! We will all soon vaporize...within the next 500 years if we keep up our current rate of consumption. It'll be too dry....it'll be too wet.....the polar bears will die.... throw another tire on the fire. Here's another article waldo you doompreacher.Have fun. http://www.co2science.org/articles/V12/N31/EDIT.php

There is so much evidence that GHG's are having very little effect on climate change. You are a fool waldo. Waldo, all of Canada was once under 2 miles of ice. How did all that ice disappear/ It wasn't ghgs that made it disappear. Why are polar icecaps on Mars shrinking? If look at science throughout history, you will realize that most scientists are in some way wrong. i can't help it that your a follower waldo...that's your problem.

It keeps getting worse for the Al Gore, David Suzuki, Liz May, waldo, wyly types. http://www.lewrockwell.com/orig11/ball-t5.1.1.html http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/30577

I'm still waiting for you to tell me where Miramar is, wyly. You often label people as "uneducated". What does "Miramar" make you? You remind me of the penguin who was laughing at the chicken because it couldn't fly. You have become a paradox of your own stupidity. I know you won't respond because, like all cowards, you choose to ignore those who ask you qauetions you can't answer. You have no credibility.

The doompreachers are grasping for straws. http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2010/nov/5/climate-change-no-longer-scares-europe/ http://www.drroyspencer.com/2010/11/climate-scientists-plan-campaign-against-global-warming-skeptics/ http://www.americanthinker.com/2010/11/the_green_bubble_is_about_to_b.html http://www.rationaloptimist.com/blog/best-shot http://www.climatechangedispatch.com/behind-the-science/7982-a-challenge-to-the-qwarmistsq

The generals of Miramar? Where the hell is Miramar? Or did you mean Myannmar?

The greenies continue to be exposed for the lies they peddle. Is Cancum about saving the world or redistributing wealth? You decide. http://www.thegwpf.org/ipcc-news/1877-ipcc-official-climate-policy-is-redistributing-the-worlds-wealth.html http://www.americanthinker.com/2010/11/the_green_bubble_is_about_to_b.html http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2010/nov/26/cancun-climate-summit-humantiy-hostage

This article from the Wall Street journal is very accurate. Bravo, Canada A U.N. snub is a badge of honor. The Wall Street Journal – Oct. 20, 2010 Life must be very good in Canada, or at least dull, judging by the domestic reaction to its failed bid last week for a temporary seat on the U.N. Security Council. Listen to the yowls in the papers north of the border: "A nation reeling," "humiliating defeat," "a rebuke from the global community," "tarnishes our reputation," "a slap in the face." We say: Way to go. Canada seems to have annoyed a sufficient number of Third World dictators and liberally pious Westerners to come up short in a secret General Assembly ballot. The sins committed by Stephen Harper's Conservative government include staunch support for Israel, skepticism about cap-and-trade global warming schemes, and long standing commitment to the Afghan war. Americans would be so lucky to get a leader as steadfast on those issues as the Canadian Prime Minister. The United Arab Emirates took credit for putting together a group of anti Canadian Arab and Islamic states to stop the bid for the two year rotating chair. The UAE also has a beef with Ottawa over landing rights for Emirates Airlines going into Canada. The U.S.. role here is also embarrassing—to the U.S. Richard Grenell, a former senior official at the U.S. Mission to the U.N., reported last week that America's U.N. ambassador, Susan Rice, refused to campaign on Canada's behalf. Mr. Harper's politics are not hers, and Liberal opposition leader and Obama political soul mate, Michael Ignatieff, declared last month that Canada under Mr. Harper didn't deserve to get one of the 10 temporary seats.. The farcical nature of all this was made clear when the Canadians lost to Portugal, which—with all due respect to the memory of Vasco DA Gama—is no global titan. This small and economically hobbled Iberian country will now hold one of two temporary spots reserved for Western bloc states. Germany was assured the other. Canada, on the other hand, is a serious country. Under Mr. Harper's leadership, Canada has avoided the worst of the global recession and emerged with a vibrant banking system and strong currency (now trading near parity to the U.S. dollar). The courage of its soldiers in Afghanistan, and in other missions, is testament to a nation that honors its commitments. Canadians should wear the U.N. snub as a badge of honor.

Nanos November 1 – 5, 2010 CPC: 37.1 LPC: 31.6 NDP: 15.5 GP: 5.2 BQ: 10.8

Waldo really doesn't understand how things work, other than copying and pasting.