Ontario Loyalist

Well, does anyone think it will happen? While watching the Inauguration, some of the commentators were talking like it was going to happen today... but whatever the case, it almost seems inevitable what with the symbolism with Lincoln, Kennedy, and MLK and being a visionary, etc...

Funnily enough, from everything that I've read, had the government that you people hate so much not stepped in, the correct status of Six Nations would be "extinct". So maybe the correct term should "ingrates," and not "sovereign"...

well, starting a facebook group is about all that tin-hat neocon republicans can do about Obama now... well, that and...

I suppose the pic on your profile is of your grand-daughter, then...? You have a keen whit and a wonderful ability for conveying the irony and conflicting social vlaues of post-modernist, post-colonialist Alberta in the midst of an 'historic' economic crisis...

I didn't know that the "Indian Affairs Minister" was a federal police officer...

It's not a provincial issue.

That would be incorrect. Six Nations is a group of Indians that were compensated for their loss of land by being granted land by the Crown. This land was purchased and allotted to Six Nations at the discretion of the British, and Six Nations given ownership rights in accordance with English property law of the period. That means that they had the right to dispose of their property as could any other land owner, and that is what they largely chose to do with their Haldimand Tract. A sovereign nation is one that is capable of maintaining their independence in terms of government and economy, and that is the case with none of the so-called First Nations in Canada. Members of "sovereign nations" are not subject to the fiduciary care of other sovereign nations. However you want to twist it, Natives receive a disproportionate amount of assistance from CANADIAN taxpayers.

You're childishness is once again demonstrated. And I'm sure that you're quoting from Lovelace vs. Ontario, er, Frontenac is done without pang of remembrance about how much of an idiot you made yourself look like earlier in this thread.

There's no logic to this argument. Nobody can legally inflict damage and monetary loss to person and/or property on the pretext that they--the person(s) causing the damage/loss--feel that they have the right to do so because the current laws don't suit them. There is a legal system in the country that is about as fair and impartial as one can get on this planet, and if the SN or any Indian can't work they system like everybody else to seek restitution, then too bad. If enough people start to see that the legal system is being abused by certain parties, there is always the chance that the majority could elect governments that would alter the laws in such a manner as to restore the legal system to what it once was. Wouldn't that be a shame?

Yeah, and they also blame arson and acts of violence relating to their on internal disputes over illegal activities (eg., smoke shops) and blame it on "Canadians" in order to further their agenda.

Oh, that I'd be glad to do...

Show me exactly where it says that Indians have the right to inflict economic loss, destruction of public and private property, and the threat and use of violence in order to "protest".

So that's basically the intent of terrorism, to inflict not only psychological fear but to interfer with the economic workings of a given state. I'm not sure that causing that much economic problem is something to be proud of, given all of the money that is forked over to Indians has to be generated through (tax) revenues. Loss of revenue means loss of income and loss of income will in some ways affect the Indian's burgeoning illegal trade in alcohol, tobacco, and drugs. So all it does is reinforce the notion that Indians are a problem, one that may have to be dealt with by concerned citizens circumventing the protection afforded by CANADIAN human rights laws.

Yeah, I saw this twit on the tube today, something about a sign on a bus, and he's standing there telling his followers to no believe in God and to think for themselves. HILARIOUS.

Does this mean that Alberta will shift below the 49th?!?!?!?!

Of course, that's how CR works. Nothing is legitimate unless it supports his agenda. It's really getting to be old hat. To put it politely, you mean...

So if Israel has a right to self-defense, I guess anyone that feels threatened by them has the right pound them into submission if they could, right? This is why there will never be peace on Earth...

Oh, and just a few months ago the Sask economy was booming and they were recruiting out of province. Well, easy come, easy go...

Yeah, and coming from you, who looked like a complete fool over the whoe Lovelace v. Ontario thing... can't get your cases right, can't even cite them properly, yet you think your "historical research" or knowledge of the Canadian legal system has any merit... hardly...

Well, you obvious have a non-existant understanding of what Canadian society and culture used to be.

No, I've never been kicked out, so I don't know what you're talking about. Implying that I am someone else is against forum rules. You have been warned. Next time you do it, I WILL report you.

No, I think the issue is whether or not it's worth wasting my time to track down something one your insistance... Given what you are, and the typical manner in which you post, it simply isn't worth the effort. If you want to sit there and act as though you didn't make the claim and paint me as the guilty party here, then that just speaks again to what kind of person you are... To refresh your memory, it was during a discussion about fundraising efforts by the Jewish community in Canada and the HUGE signs that are posted in front of synagogues to raise money for a foereign country's military... you said something to the effect of not noticing them on your way to church... so, go find it yourself...

Wait, are you suggesting that I'm a previously banned member? I believe that's against forum rules... not to mention your flaming and trolling.

Honestly, they day I start caring whether something like you thinks I'm credible, I may as well go kill myself; but seeing that that will never happen...

Um.... when they tested the first A-Bomb, there was speculation that it might cause a chain reaction that wouldn't stop--but it was tested anyway because they wanted to drop it on Germany... Whatever the case, the Nazis weren't "exterminating" the Jews working on the bomb, so... Also, nuclear weapons are not justified, even for "self-defense"...