whowhere

You are killing me, buddy you have no effing language. Get your own effing alphabet http://www.popamericana.com/!/Alphabet%20Evolution.gif These letters are of Latin and has origins in Rome. Show me the English alphabet? Until then eff off with your offensive rude actions.

http://www.cic.gc.ca/English/citizenship/cit-ceremony.asp People should learn to love their Queen. Dreaming and fantasizing her away is not going to Change the fact she is the sovereign of Canada.

To little to late. The Boomers and and their parents used the 1982 Constitution to sell Canada out to feather their own nests. Canada has increased its population from 20 million to 34 million through Immigration since 1982. The people in Canada today do not reflect Canadian Heritage and they are here in Canada for their economic gain. Canada's quality of life is not what the Boomer's parents enjoyed. The fact is the Canadian people were denied a voice before 1982. The Queen gave us a voice and the boomer trash and their parents took it away from us through their corruption and greed. 1867 Canada chose to use that constitution to unravel Canada where Canada is now a cultural wasteland. What you want is never going to happen and if anything Canada will likely face some political Invervention by the Queen's office and Britain to remedy Canada's political abuse and destruction of Canada. Britain Fought, defended, and populated Canada prior to 1982 with other Commonwealth countries people. Britain gave Canada the tools to makes it own decisions and to do right by Canada but the corrupt chose to use this to ruin Canada.

And who appoints the Governor General and who does the Governor General represent? Rhetorical of course.

Double post

What are you talking about? Do you even know the history? France supported American by providing money and military supplies all the while lying to the British as their involvement. France supported the Americans in Secrets. Napoleon was imagination? Hitler and the gassing of the Jews never happened either? What history are you reading. The only reason Britain was safe from Napoleon because they had a channel of water protecting them. Napoleon was a force to reckon with and he dominated Europe for 30 years. Had Napoleon used the Resources of France to Bitch slap the US for bankrupting France and throwing France into Revolution events today would be different. France has long history of Conquest. Hmmm, Fact Louis the XV or XVI not sure which but when the revolution went down in France in 1789 he was executed by the French revolutionaries. US achieves indepedence in 1778, 1789 France errupts into violent bloody revolution which would rock Europe to its core for 30 years. Why because King Lousi XV, XVI whatever raise taxes to unbearable level to pay for this support. Europe could not stand against the wrath of France's military power. It took an Act of God to bring napoleon down. Napoleon entered Russia with largest army ever amassed to then be defeated by the weather not combat. Napoleon retreated, yet he was able to remobilize a new army and go on the offense once again. He was formidable. If Europe could not against France's military machine there is no well in hell the United States of the day would stand snowballs chance in hell. Learn History buddy. You know nothing of History. What is Quebec and Ontario was 1604 Canada: a French Colony. 1604 Canada fell under British Ocupation in 1759. 1774 France provided the money and muscle to liberate the United States from Britain. France did this to regain Canada. There is plenty of supporting documentation to corroborate this. 1789 The cost of supporting the United States was be placed on the French and they in turn broke into a violent revolution which brought about the collapse of the Christian Kingdom of Europe where Kings and Queens were alluded to be ruling by devine right. The stakeholders of 1759 is the British, France and 1604 Canada (Quebec). Quebec's history is not 1867s Canada's History. 1867 Canada can eff off.

The inability to retake Canada was because France Bankrupted itself liberating the United States and King Louis XV subsequently lost his life because of it. There was no opportunity for France to remedy this. Napoleon had no connection to the monarchy, he rose to power through his vanity and egocentricity. All his decisions were based on what was in his interest. Really, manifest Destiny?? I don't think you understand the United States at all if the US was ruled by manifest destiny they had their chance to take Canada during the World Wars while Europe and the rest of the world was preoccupied fighting Germany. The US decided to take the high road and not seize that opportunity. Had the US not taken the High Road, Britain would have been saying along with France Hail Hitler While Canada would have been marching to the tune of Uncle Sam. So your argument of manifest destiny is BS. 1759 - 1800 represents a pocket of History Between North America and Europe that has to be looked at together. 1867 Canada was fought for, defended, and established by Britain. Nothing has altered that fact. At no point has Britain relinquished its claim on Canada. Because their claim has been passive, people are deluded into thinking that will not change. It is obvious Canada's politicians and bureacrats hate Canada. Any country that panders to world interests at the expense of the Canadian people and broadcasts itself as the world's bike where everyone gets a turn is reprehensible and a disgrace. The 1982 Constitution was meant to bond Canada together not to be used to drive the country into a cultural shithole that it is today. For that reason Canada's independence from Britain will be questioned. Canada's current political model is one of exploitation of the Canadian people and immigration policies for the benefit of Canada's bureacrats and politicians. Britain will catch on to what is going on and move to correct this rampant trough feeding corruption. Is this what Britain fought for? Is this the Canada the Queen had in mind in establishing the 1982 Constitution? I don't think so. Canada had an opportunity to use the 1982 constitution as a mechanism of Good but it chose corruption and abuse instead. Canada has lost its right to be independent. Do not the let the political trash use This politics of distraction in attacking Quebec to distract you from their corruption. Quebec has always been used a whipping posts to distract the people away from the real issues. Protest the Queens office and tell her what Canada's politicians and bureacrats are up to. Do not be distracted by their rants on quebec.

There is 1604 - 1759 Canada and 1867 - present Canada. The plains of Abraham is where 1604 Canada fell under British Occupation and in turn was renamed Quebec of 1867 Canada.

Canada/Quebec endured between 1604 to 1759 along side the American Colonies. That's 155 years. France held onto the colony that long in spite of Britains so called Navel Superiority. Quebec/Canada was a growing and evolving region it is unlikely they would have withered and died. Had the United States succeeded in Liberating Quebec from Britain I doubt an independent United States would have imposed itself on Quebec for fear of France retaliating against them. The newly established United States was to weak to be threatening anyone. The Americans had no interest in Quebec they had plenty of area to expand in the west. If what you are saying is True why didn't they American's take Lousianna instead waiting for Napoleon to sell it to them?? The Fact is Quebec/Canada was a populated and growing colony that fell under occupation. It was not some empty field. Since's 1759, Quebec's population has ever increased. For whatever reason you people have issue with that. I am not quite sure who you people are but Canada was fought for and defended by the British against the Americans. Canada belongs to them and nothing has changed that fact.

Yes, people should note that and stop living in their fantasy Canada.

British Naval superiority didn't stop France from delivering the battaleon that secured US independence. Maybe Britain was superior on the sea and France on land but it is doubtful Britain would have defended the Independent United States From France taking Canada from the US had they possessed Canada. It is also doubtful the US at the time could resist France from taking Canada from them had this been the course of History. Obviously, The United States today is a military super power and Britain and France together could not take them. Fighting over history has been to 1867 Canada's detriment. Had Canada embraced common ground instead of what divides Canada there is little doubt Canada could have been a world leader instead of a backward resource base country. The Politics of distraction utilized by Canada's politicians, bureacrats, and media has eroded this country. These people need to expunged from the public eye.

https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/th...ok/geos/ca.html Why don't you like the Queen? According to this US website she is the Head of state. Believe what you want but that will not change the reality of this situation. And then there is the http://www.cic.gc.ca/English/citizenship/c...remony.asp#oath Oath of citizenship You should stop with your delusions.

Ok so people are confused because there is two treaties of paris. The one in 1763 ceding Canada to Britain and the Treaty of Paris in 1783 establishing Independence for the United States. Not sure how this helps the argument against France helping the United States move for Independence to get Canada back. When you make claims had the US been successful they would not have returned Canada to France is doubtful. George Washington was a man of principles and character. Had he succeeded in their 4 years quest to gain Canada it would have been returned to France why? Because they needed France to recognize them as an Independent Country and to establish and continue trade. If they did succeed in Gaining Canada (Thanks to Benedict Arnold they didn't) There is little doubt Canada would have been returned to France. Had France and Spain not secured military victory to establish the United States the US would still be sipping tea and toasting the queen. The US was in no position to take on France as France would have decimated the US. Look at the Facts. Napoleon mobilized France's military resources and dominated Europe for 30 years to fuel his vanity. Had History Taken the turn where France Succeeded in Establishing the US, Canada was gained by the US, and France did not fall into Revolution that Led to King Louis XV demise Napoleon still would have rose the ranks and been there to be a force to contend with. Instead of Napoleon unleashing his wrath upon Europe he could have been unleashed upon a weak United States by King Louis XV to take Canada from the US. If Europe could not stand against France? How could the US? Had the US succeeded they would have certainly handed over Canada or they would have faced a crushing defeat at the hands of Napoleon. It's no secret. In the United States move for Independence they betrayed France in negotioting with England behind France's back. Because France fell into Revolution anything and everything got lost in the torrent of History. As they say hindsite is 20/20. You people are not interested in truth. All you people are interested is your propoganda to push your biased agenda.

What's your point? The deal was made between the British Monarch and Quebec. The British Monarch still exists and Quebec still exists. Britain didn't defeat anyone. They captured a poorly defended colony. France was blocked from sending its battleships. 20 years later France empowered and established an Independent United States. Part of the conscessions to establish an Independent United States was the ceding of canada to England. Wait a second??? Something is not adding up?? Why would France need to cede Canada to Britain in the Treaty of Paris when Canada was already under British Occupation since 1759?? wasn't Canada already in British Possession? Ceding an already possessed Canada (?????) in the Treaty of Paris goes to establish a fact that France indeed supported American Independence for the reason of getting Canada back. Really??? Think about that, if you people can think. Canada/Quebec was already a possession of Britian so why would France need to cede Canada in the Treaty of Paris unless it was clear to Britain as to why France supported American Independence: They wanted Canada and the US fought 4 years to gain Canada. The treaty was designed to establish an Independent United States. At least that was accomplished. France honored its agreement, the United States didn't. The Contintental Congress fought four years to gain Canada. Why not reenact that fight? Why does everyone dwell on 1759 and 1812. What about 1774 -1778 when the US why trying to gain Quebec? How about re-enacting that?

Buddy I am not the world's whore. 1867 Canada's politicians and bureacrats have driven Canada into cultural immolation. They hate Canada and those of Canada so much they have stripped Canada of the Quality of Life The boomer's parents enjoyed and took for granted but the younger generations can only dream about. The king of England made a deal with Quebec to manage its own affairs and culture. The plains of Abraham is Quebec's heritage not 1867 Canada's heritage. Until you people recognize 1759 and 1812 is British History there is nothing further to say. History is what it is and the plains of Abraham is not 1867 Canada history but History between France, Quebec and Britain.

Fact is Lafayette tried to regain Canada and it is documented. France Tried to defend Canada during the seven year war but was blocked from doing so. Maybe the Queen has taken on a ceremonial role but the reality is she has power via the British Parliament to move on Canada. https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/th...ok/geos/ca.html The Queen is the head of state. Quebec was divided into two after American Independence to make way for American Freedom Traitors. Upper Canada was mostly an empty field prior to American Independence. Are you for you real? Nova Scotia and New Brunswick were Acadia of New France and the residents were deported to Lousianna. Coming From Someone who is cofused as to Nova Scotia and New Brunswick being Acadia need I comment here. Canada was ceded to England not 1867 Canada. No event has changed that fact. I hate Jews?? You should re read my posts and you would see if there was hate it would be at Christians and muslims and not jews. I would hardly call it hate. I merely point out the obvious. Jesus was likely brainwashed by his family and was led to believe Angel Gabriel appeared unto Joseph who told Joseph to not go in unto Mary until God did his business on Mary. So you have the so called immaculate conception of God defiling himself by having sex with a woman to beget Jesus. Yeah right......to funny. In a furtherance you have mohammed who sees Angel Gabriel in the Desert and is Given the Koran. Hey whynot God himself? Fact Jesus dies at 33 (supposedly he resurrected but no one knows where he is at??). Mohammed at 40. If you want short lives you will be Christian and or Muslims. Noah built the ark at 500 years old and died when he 900 years old. Incoherence? I say alot of things, mostly not in line with the revisionist agenda.

Rather moronic statement coming from someone who trying to impose themselves on a history that is not theirs.

https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/th...ok/geos/ca.html Oh really, if Quebec did not manage its own affairs then how is it they have a civil law system based on French Law. Hmm, people elected in quebec and drafted laws reflecting that dynamic. Looks like Quebec democracy and management of its affairs at work. What part of 1776 do you not understand. What part of the treaty of paris do you not understand. What is it about the Statutues of Liberty in the US and France you don't get. The US is an independent Country thanks to France and Spain and they are governed by a constitution which was constructed and voted on by the people of the United States in a act of democracy. ROTFLOL.......Really?? So I guess the 1982 constitution by your admission is null and void. Sorry, bud the English Common Law is one of precedents. The 1982 constitution established that the British Parliament and the Queen Can establish Laws that impact Canada and that would also include repealing them. Canada did not meet the conditions of the Statue of westminister to become independent. Repealing the Statue of Westminister before Canada succeeds in meeting the requirements is valid and in Line with English Common Law. Your post is one of a defeated and emotional ranter. You are in denial of the facts. Perhaps but it will only be a matter of time before questions start surfacing as to how Britain fought to gain Canada in 1759, Fought to defend Canada in 1812, and populated Canada outside of Quebec in the 1800's but is somehow is not entitled to its property as outlined in the Treaty of Paris. Canada was ceded to England, Not ceded to 1867 Canada which in reality is still beholden to the British Monarch contrary to what trash politicians, bureacrats, and the media spin. https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/th...ok/geos/ca.html What do you make of that Canadien?? Coming from a church who insisted the world was flat and using a Roman Language of a people that could care less about Christians doesn't carry much weight. The Romans believed in the God of Jupiter not Jesus. And the God of Jupiter is more valid than Jesus. Jesus was a good man. He preached the keys of heaven but in fact delivered the mechanism and gateway to hell. The fact, Christians are responsible for the burning of countless books from the Roman Era in turn burying the truth of the day is contemptous. As God of Jacob says, eye for eye. If Christians wanted to destroy the God of Jupiter, it is only fair for the God of Jupiter to destroy Christians. Jupiter says get your own alphabet. Jupiter is about Law and Social Order, not christian lies and dementia.

When he was trying to regain Canada in 1778 without US support, who was he doing it for? If what you are saying is true why did Canada require the Queen to sign the 1982 Constitution which paved the way for the political - bureacractic abuse and immolation of Canada. Why is Queen still stated as the Sovereign of Canada. Why did the Governor General welcome Barack Obama if Canada is an independent as you allude to. How did the US constitution come into Force? How did the European Union Constitution come into force? People had to vote, not politicians, people had to vote for it to come into force. Like the 1982 Constitution, the Quebec people did not vote to join the Dominion of Canada. It was imposed on the Quebec people. We should recap the Salient points. The Canada we know did not exist until 1867. Prior to US declaration of Independence (1776), Canada was mostly populated by the French and Natives. After independence Canada was divided into what is Ontario and Quebec. To rival Quebec's population increases the British Monarch brought in Millions of people from other commonwealth Countries during the 1800's. So how is it that you people think you have any entitlment and right to what happened on the Plains of Abraham in 1759? The Canada we know did not exist. You people had no ancestoral connection other than perhaps you are descendents from the English. Point 1 All you have is your claim Quebec was abondoned by France and left to rot which is a lie and propoganda to elevate your vanity. However, the King of England made a deal with Quebec prior 1776 to allow Quebec to manage its own affairs. Logically that would also include how the plains of Abraham is be to celebrated today. Quebec existed then, you didn't. Point 2 You people claim Quebec was conquered and should be thankful it has what it has. To rub this fact in, you repeatedly dwell on the treaty of Paris where France ceded Canada to England. Let us pause on that fact, Canada was ceded to England not the Canada created in 1867 but England. Canada is still beholden to the Monarch. The Statue of Westminister had a specific mechanism required for Canada to become independent of the monarch. That mechanism includes 5 commonwealth Countries exacting parliamentary support to make Canada independent. This has not been done so Canada is still Beholden to the Monarch and the British parliament. The 1982 Constitution hasn't changed this fact. There is nothing stopping the British parliament and the Queen from repealing the Statue of Westminister and the Canada act to bring Canada back under the parliamentary Control of Britain. This can happen at any time and the only recourse Canada will have is to bring the Matter before the International Court of Justice. However, the Treaty of Paris is explicit. Canada was ceded to England, kind of like the deed to the house I would think. I see this as a probable reality given the fact Canada's political and bureacratic trash are bent on growing Canada's population and prosperity through it's immigration policies rather than build a strong and innovative Canada through its own power. If this is what it means to be a 1867 Canadian then to hell with you all and I am quite sure that is the fate of your individual future. On that I say you should read the King James, it's a Good book. It was brought about by the same King who established the United Kingdom - Britain. The book is a backdrop to North America and goes to all your looming fates of non existent obliteration out of the book of life. Enjoy your Heaven on the backs of immigrates and the immolation of the younger Generations. Eye of the Needle, Eye of the needle..........

That why he trying to Free Canada from British occupation. He wasn't doing it for the United States. And when did Canada become an independent Country from England? Sure you keep telling yourself that. Right......Quebec had no say in the matter. They were forced into confederation by the British Monarch. Just like the Chinese in Hong Kong were proud of their British Occupiers. Like India was proud of of British Occupation. You are rewriting History. Fact is, whatever Canada's population before 1774 (American Independence) is irrelevant because the rest of Canada was unpopulated. Quebec was permitted to carry on as it did under British Occupation after 1759. The fact is what is now Ontario wasn't much of a population, mostly an empty field and zero population. After the US gained Independence all the American traitors (British Loyalists) made their home in Ontario. Quebec's population was ever increasing and they were prospering. To Rival this Growth the British Crown brought in millions of people from other commonwealth Countries. In spite of this Quebec still continued to Grow in population in comparison to the rest of Canada. The United States is Lucky Napoleon never directed his Army at the US instead of Russia. Napoleon was vain and about himself and power. Me, I am about Truth and Power. I am both of english and french ancestory. I am both of protestant and catholic ancestory. Both these ancestory geneology roads lead back to the Roman Empire. The letters I use, is of Rome. They are not english nor french. It comes to the Character of those involved. The US is guilty of contributing to the Collapse of the Ancien Regime - "God's Christian Kingdom on Earth" by Bankrupting France. Out of this Bankruptcy Napoleon rose and crushed the Ancien Regime. He wreaked havoc on Europe for 30 years. This all ties to the helping the United States? Why and for what reason would France bankrupt itself? France wanted Canada back. They tried to defend Canada during the Seven Year War but was Blocked from doing so. France supported the American Independence through money, military resources, and the crucial military muscles of their ships which secured their independence. Lafayette made a final attempt to Capture Canada but failed. King Louis XV has documented diologue about Canada with another King on the subject of Canada which shows he wanted Canada. Bury the truth, because it is sustained and can be found in the Archives of Europe and the Founding documents of the United States. You want history it can't be in vain at Quebec's expense. Imposing and strong arming a region is no way to build a United Country but that is Canada incepted in 1867. Canada should have done more to bridge the gaps and created unity instead of trying to crush Quebec. The Fact is, you people have no Religion, no language, and not much of a culture.

Modern day US is the benefactor of the immense good will of those who fought for an independent United States and established the constitution. This constitution is what made the US into what it is today. There is no way such a constitution would have been created by the likes of those in the US today. The constitution was established to create a balance of individual liberties and the preservation of Government. The US has the most democratically elected government in the world extending to their judges. That is more that can be said for Canada. But then again Canada was not designed to be independent but beholden to the British Crown. At one point the British will wake up to that fact and do something to correct that.

LoL, that is so true Canadien. People see what they see and ignore the rest.

Perhaps you could then explain why the Marquis Lafayette of France spearheaded a final push to capture Canada around 1779. Perhaps you could explain why the United States tried to capture canada for 4 years. This pursuit was kaibashed because of Benedict Arnold's betrayal. Why would the continental congress waste its time and spend so many years trying to gain Canada? Spin your lies because there is ample evidence to show France supported American Independence to regain Canada. No one anticipates failure. This is how it played out. To quebec's dismay the US failed and they have paid the price with treasonous Freedom traitors phsycho abuse ever since. Interestly Canada was ceded to England and Not Canada. So how is it that Canada is a separate political body from Britain. Like Quebec Canada has been lost in the historical shuffle. If I were Britain I would start to question how it is that Canada is out of its political domain and start doing something about that. If I were Britain I would use this treaty of Paris, the fact king George Abdicted the throne to Britain during the second world war, and I would repeal the Canada Act and the Statue of Westminister eliminating Canada's indepence. In a further move if I were britain I would bring this before the international court and present the treaty and the abdictation as their entitlement to all the monarch's realms. It's only a matter of time before Britain starts questioning Canada's legitamacy.

France did not abondon Quebec. Fact France was blocked from Sending its battleships during the Seven Year War to protect Canada. Abodonment?? The Marquies Lafayette of France tried to get the Continental Congress to support a final push to capture Canada in 1778 to 1780. Abondonment Pal?? The continental Congress didn't have the backbone because they already Got what they wanted - an Independent United States at France's and Quebec's expense. There is documented dialogue of King Louis XV and another King (Germany??) of his aspirations to get Canada back. Abondonment buddy? You can be sure that these documents will become more mainstream as time comes out. There is alot of supporting historical documentation the proves that Quebec was not abondoned but lost in the shuffle of History. It could be argued the invasion of Canada during the war of 1812 by the United States was a move on their part to make good on this intention. The documented dialogue of the founders of the United States demonstrate this potential. Abondoned buddy?? You are definately a effing lying loser. I would systematically find the supporting documentation to support what I have stated but I will leave that as my future to do list. If anything I would have to question your Heritage. You are either a Queen Loving Freedom Traitor who ran from the United States fight for Independence or you are just some asshole who came here because your parents decided to settle in Canada from another common wealth Country, or you are just a lifeless loser peroid. If you are a decendent of one of those American Traitor Assholes, I suggest you leave because you are just a dick. Not only was Quebec not abondoned by France, it is on record the "original Canadians" fought with the Americans for four years to secure American Independence. What did your traitor to freedom Ancestors do? Fought against the United States but now like some beaten dog you are eager to kiss the United States Ass at every opportunity - Loser!! Keep projecting what you are on Quebec because the force of history states otherwise. The Problem is, the Real Canadian History is a contrast to the English Canada revisionist agenda. Continue to be vain you will get what you deserve.

Really? What do you make of "Emporer" Napoleon? He bitch slapped Europe into submission for 30 years. I guess that never happened. French is inferior in what way? All you have is your Arogance and your psyche abuse of Quebec. You can be sure when death is at your door you will be escorted to the Furnace along with the rest of your compatriots. Of course that will not happen until satan is finished with you. You should read the King James. Contructed/Assembled in 1604 by 50 English scholars commissioned by King James of the newly Established Great Britain. Yep, the very King James who established Great Britain by Bringing England, Scotland, Wales and Ireland into one Country. I like to think of the King James as a covenant between those of Great Britain after this date. Like it or Not you English scum will be held to account to every nuance in that book. Count on it. This is Good because this book casts a wide net and in fact envelopes alot of people in North America: The United States and Canada alike. I know one should not get so excited but I honestly feel and sense the looming doom in store for you all that I am beginning to feel more and more elated each every day I witness the shit coming out of you people. On that I shake my head knowing "life" is going to get even with you shit branches one way or another. You people should really understand the 40 year journey through the wilderness by Moses after the exodus from Eygypt. Many didn't make it and it is quite clear why. The book is allegory and not entirely literal. It is meant to convey an understanding. It's up to you to be grateful for this miracle of life you are in. For the inquiring minds out there, the King James was traslated from the Masoretic Text - the allepo Codex. If you are Catholic, the catholic bible is based on the septuagint. The septuagint was trascribed into Greek around 300 before christ. Out of this book is where the mushroom of shit known as Christians came to be what they are today. Protestant/Catholics who really gives a rats ass you are both equally offensive to the essence of God portrayed in the old testament. So really what makes English Superior to French? You are both using the Latin Alphabet. If you read about the septuagint they will tell it is not written in modern greek but a historical greek dialect. Hmmm, think about that. English and French are nothing more than Latin dialects. The Latin alphabet belongs to Rome. The Romans had their own Gods which is not Jesus or the God of Moses. That God is Jupiter. So people sing your tunes but when death does take you know what you have sown will be what you reap. You want to sow shit the you will reap your shit. You want to inflict emotional dominance on Quebec because you think you are better do it but you will just be contemptuous lot and nothing more. Live your vanity.